Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

HRM - 2017 > Employee Resourcing > Flashcards

Employee Resourcing Flashcards

1
Q

Employee resourcing definition

A

Staffing and mobilising workforce - right people doing the right jobs at the right time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What employee resourcing focuses on

A

Recruiting, selecting, inducting, retention, dismissal, and retirement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Good practice of recruitment and selection - Purpose

A

Hire best qualified and highest performing staff while being fair to job applicants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Good practice of recruitment and selection - 4 main stages

A
  1. Job analysis and design
  2. Recruitment
  3. Selection
  4. Induction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Job analysis and design - what does it use

A

Job description and person specifications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Selection of good practice

A

Using objective methods to accurately predict future performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Induction - use

A

Ensure newbies perform to high levels as quick as possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Competency meaning

A

Boyzatis (1982) - underlying characteristic of a person resulting in effective and superior performance in job

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Competency framework - what is it

A

List of personal attributes expressed as what ppl can do and how they prefer to conduct work (similar to person specs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Competency framework steps

A
  1. Identify best performers
  2. Find underlying characteristics that they share
  3. Formulate framework
  4. Compare candidate list to framework
  5. Hire those who have a higher number
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Competency framework vs person specifications

A

Competencies are not specific to jobs/job groups, as it covers wide range of divisions or whole organisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What can the competency framework be used for in HRM practices?

A

Performance mgmt, employee development, recruitment and selection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What tests can be conducted to find underlying characteristics?

A

Interview, personality tests, direct observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Milsom (2009)

A

Competency frameworks are more distinct than person specs as it focuses on organisational values: not just simple attributes to get job done, also language that reflects core values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Pros of competency frameworks

A
  • modern business context requires flexibility, not appropriate to define narrow jobs
  • globalisation, tech, unpredictable market conditions means that job description/person specs need continuous updating (costly and disruptive)
  • Effective performers are less about skills sets and more about attitudes/personal values (skills can be trained, attitudes are hard to influence)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cons of competency framework

A
  • Produce clones - reduced diversity (Kandola et al, 2000), same mindset and values, less creativity and innovation
  • International organisations: doesn’t consider cultural differences
  • Reflect characteristics that worked in the past, doesn’t reflect attributes needed to develop for the future
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the best approach for recruitment and selection?

A

Blend competency framework and job analysis, drawing best features:

  • incorporate competencies with role-specific points
  • likely future requirements
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Internal recruitment - define

A

Existing staff are given preference when new job opportunities arise in organisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Types of internal recruitment

A
  • Jobs first advertised internally, then externally if there are no candidates
  • Internal applicants compete with external
  • Jobs are only advertised internally, external candidates are not considered at all
20
Q

Informal recruitment - define

A

Jobs are not formally advertised (e.g. WOM), unsolicited applications that may turn out being suitable

21
Q

Criticisms of internal/informal recruitment

A
  • unfair because excludes possible candidates, operates against minorities and benefits powerful
  • potential external candidates may be better performers
22
Q

Pros of internal recruitment

A
  • low cost (no training/advertising)
  • Low risk (expectations are known, less disillusioned)
  • speed of adjustment (little induction/support)
  • incentive and motivation (developmental opportunities)
  • return on investment (waste of money invested in development of employees)
23
Q

Sparrow and Hilton (1994)

A

European companies show evidence that support the benefits of internal recruitment

24
Q

Cho et al (2006)

A

American hotels that promoted internally suffered higher levels of employee turnover among non-managerial jobs

25
Q

Problems with internal recruitment

A
  • ppl being promoted without training and support to carry new roles effectively
  • unsuccessful applications lead to demotivation
  • Senior mgmt need external recruits in order to avoid dull/non-innovative
26
Q

Pros of informal recruitment

A
  • less likely to be disillusioned as they know what to expect
  • Less expensive
  • less likely to leave early
  • Turn out stronger/more qualified than external recruits
  • fits with some cultural norms
27
Q

Employer branding

A

Building organisation reputation as employer, seen positive and distinct from competitors

28
Q

Employer of choice

A

Organisation recognised as most desirable in industry from candidate perspective (most target market would like to work for)

29
Q

Employee value proposition (EVP)

A

Terms and conditions and potential experiences that org tries to offer its recruits in order to attract/retain

30
Q

Employer branding - focus

A
  • develop and communicate compelling EVP to achieve employer-of-choice status
31
Q

Caveat of Employer branding

A
  • EVP must be lived in experience of employees, misleading leads to loss of trust
32
Q

Employer branding - steps

A
  1. Find out what employees perceive as best things from employment experience, how is it distinct from competition
  2. Formulation of compelling EVP
  3. Develop short, snappy slogan summing up main points of EVP to use in advertisement
33
Q

Tools to achieve first stage of employer branding

A
  • employ specialist consultants to advise and carry research, focus groups, wider employee surveys
34
Q

Concerns of employer branding

A

Multi-national employers - using single EVP to employ ppl in different cultural contexts
- EVP will have to be tailored to meet local preferences

35
Q

Problems with Headhunting

A
  • Companies that source recruits, seen as incompatible with ‘good practice’
  • Industry is unregulated, guilty of misleading recruiters and recruits
  • expensive, tendency for agency to exaggerate qualities of candidates, very narrow field of candidates
  • attracts negative media comments
  • agents contact candidates already on their books, as they’re reluctant to make major research
  • don’t commit with genuine equal opportunities for selecting new recruits from widest possible field of talent
36
Q

Why headhunting

A
  • need to fill highly specialised role, placing advertisement in press/website is unlikely to be successful
  • Company is expanding operations into new regions and lacks expertise to recruit locally. headhunters have required contacts and understanding of labour market
  • Company doesn’t want existing staff to know recruitment activity
  • headhunters provide contact to professional groups, highest calibre recruits, Jobs that are well-paid and T&C are negotiable before appointment
  • subcontract headhunters to communicate confidentially with candidates working for competitors and present excellent shortlist
  • develop strong links with headhunters and work with them over a long period
  • exclusivity, employer ensures consultant works for them and refrain from exaggerating abilities or attracting successful candidates away to further jobs elsewhere after commission has been paid
37
Q

Selection interviews

A

Most common method for selection process: Formal face-to-face encounter

38
Q

Traditional/unstructured interviews

A
  • one/two interviewers
  • no specific questions
  • decisions of selection made by interviewer, who fills existing skill gaps and who they personally like the most?
39
Q

Criticisms of traditional interviews

A
  • Unfair bias risk, interviewers favour ppl like themselves, first impressions/prejudicial judgements (disfavours minority groups)
  • Poor predictor of job performance or those who stay in organisation for a good length of time
  • People with good interview skills are appointed irrespective of skills, abilities or attributes that contributes to the job
  • candidates are given opportunities to shine as they get asked helpful questions or manage to steer conversations to suit their strengths
40
Q

Method to predicting good performance

A

Relative predictive validity: score on scale 0-1

  • 1 = future job performance predicted perfectly
  • 0 = no capacity to predict future work performance
41
Q

Schmitt and Fandre (2008)

A
  • Traditional/unstructured interviews scored poorly (0.1-0.2)
  • predictive validity of structured interviews - 0.4 to 0.6
42
Q

Cook (2004)

A

Traditional interviews gives candidates opportunity to manage impressions through force of personality, personal charm or presenting themselves professionally

43
Q

Rigorous and structured interviews

A

Candidates have same questions, enabling comparisons. questions asked derive from person specification or competency framework ensuring that candidates meet specific requirements for a job
- requires involvement of panel of interviewers who score candidates against some selection criteria. after all interviews, panel discusses and reaches consensus

44
Q

Situational questioning

A

candidates are asked about how they’d act in hypothetical situations directly relevant to job. Establish preferred approach in scenarios they’d face

45
Q

Behavioural questions

A

Focused on past experiences, past occasions were effective/relevant skills or attributes were used. what did they do? Why did they choose that approach? What might they do differently?

46
Q

Pros of structured interviews

A

Approaches fairer, less unjustified bias, much better to predict future performance accurately (fits requirements of ‘good practice’)

47
Q

Pros of traditional interviews

A

Problem lies this with format and more with poor interviewers. unfair bias and prejudice is allowed by interviewer

  • unwise to judge effectiveness purely against prediction of future performance. conversational nature provides information about the job and organisation to see whether they’d take the job offer
  • inexpensive and flexible, structured involve preparation and participation of a group of managers. cheaper when compared to other selection methods (personality testing, assessment centres)
  • most candidates prefer traditional, feel comfortable and see it as fair

HRM - 2017 (5 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions