Entanglement Flashcards

1
Q

Composite system

A

|q1>=a0|0>+a1|1>
|q2>=b0|0>+b1|1>
|phi>=a0b0|00>+a0b1|01>+a1b0|10>+a1b1|11>
This is a superposition. The sum of the amplitudes squared is 1.
|01> tensor of |0>|1>=[1 0]’[0 1]’=[0 1 0 0]’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Can we derive the qbits of a composite system ?

A

Take the general form:
|q1>=a0|0>+a1|1>
|q2>=b0|0>+b1|1>
|phi>=a0b0|00>+a0b1|01>+a1b0|10>+a1b1|11>
Then replace the amplitudes of the composite system and see what a1,a2,b1,b2 should equal to.
If there is a contradiction: the 2 states are entangled and they cannot be extracted !
if a0b0.a1b1/=a0b1.a1b0 then entangled ! if equal, unentangled
if unentangled:
put common factor of 1stqbit and amplitudes (do length parenthesis).
x0|0>(y0|0>+y1|1>)+x1|1>(y0|0>+y1|1>)
the 2 parenthesis should be the same, otherwise would mean entangled.
then we have (x0|0>+x1|1>)(y0|0>+y1|1>)
The 2 qbits are unentangled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Entangled

A

State where qbits cannot be described individually
If we measure the 1st qbit, it collapse and we know what the second qbit will be.
This does not imply an exchange of information !

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Bell’s State

A

Entangled states
1/sqrt(2)|00> + 1/sqrt(2)|11>
Changing base will always give the same !
(rewrite +/- in terms of 0/1 : |+> = 1/sqrt(2) |0> + 1/sqrt(2) |1> and |-> = 1/sqrt(2) |0> - 1/sqrt(2) |1> then 1/sqrt(2)|++> + 1/sqrt(2)|- -> with this new notation and cancel out terms until finding 1/sqrt(2)|00> + 1/sqrt(2)|11>)
1/sqrt(2)|00> + 1/sqrt(2)|11>=1/sqrt(2)|++> + 1/sqrt(2)|–>
state will collapse accordingly no matter which base we measure in
This equality is the base of the EPR paradox

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

EPR paradox

A

measuring 1 entangled qbit means that the other collapse: info exchange ?
This would break the uncertainty principle: closer you are to a base the more uncertain you are to the other.
This paradox is rejected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

CNOT operator

A

Unitary matrix
[1 0 0 0; 0 1 0 0; 0 0 0 1; 0 0 1 0]
Second qbit flips if 1st qbit is 1
This output an entangled state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Flip operator

A

Unitary matrix
[0 0 0 1; 0 0 1 0; 0 1 0 0; 1 0 0 0]
both qbits flip

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Partial measurement rule

A

if have
|phi>=a0b0|00>+a0b1|01>+a1b0|10>+a1b1|11>
and we measure 1st qbit, eg |0>
then second qbit is narrowed to: b0|00>+ b1|01>
the superposition is |0>(x)(b0|0>+ b1|1>)/(sqrt(b0^2+b1^2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

NOT operator

A

NOT is [0 1;1 0]

flips the qbit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Operations on Qbit

A

tensor product of the matrices
if no transformation : I
if transformation: U
eg: no transformation on 1st qbit and transformation on 2nd
-> I (x) U
This allows to use tensor product to build larger unitary matrices
does not work for CNOT !

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly