EP2 Flashcards
Permeability to water when there is no osmotic gradient?
Diffusional water permeability (Pd).
Continuous movement into/out of the cell.
Influx=efflux. No volume change.
Permeability to water when there is an osmotic gradient?
Osmotic water permeability (Pf) e.g. cell in hypertonic solution.
Pf/Pd ratio?
Directional water movement/ bidirectional water movement.
If ratio greater than one: There is a water pore present in cell membrane (as directional movement).
e.g. NA/glu cotransporter has water pore properties.
Study on Pd/pf in cells? Vague method and results?
1953 mesured Pd/pf in a variety of cells using the cartesian diver balance method.
Greater than 1 (water pore) in all cells tested bar the trout eggs.
How to measure Pd?
Cartesian Diver Balance.
Diver balances at a varaible equilibirum in a heavy water (D2O) chamber according to cell weight and pressure of chamber.
As cells exchange D2O for H2O they will pull the diver down in the chamber as they get heavier. The amount of pressure needed to be added into the chamber to keep the diver at a given height is measured. (Add vaccum diver rises).
suction needed proportional to the water diffusion.
1953 cell study Pd results?
All cells (bar trout) had to keep having suction put into the chamber but less and less over time as the diver gradually equilibriates where the same amount of D2O and H2O is transferred. On log graph there is a gradual plateau. Rapid exchange of cell water in all cases with the t½ of exchange < 4.5 minutes bar In trout eggs no evidence of water diffusion even after 5 hours
How to measure Pf?
Meaure the change in volume of a cell overtime when exposed to hypertonic/hypotonic solutions.
Pf= AV/ SA x t x AC
Change in vol (diameter)= Pf x Surface area x time x concentration change (gradient)
1953 cell study Pf?
All cells swelled when added hypotonic solution in the bath (low solutes outside- water rushes in the cell) and shrinks when hypertonic (increased solutes outside- water leaves).
All cells bar the trout egg.
Explaination for trout eggs very low (no) water permeability ability?
They are layed into freshwater (not saltwater), so likely evolved to lose this ability else water will just rush in and the egg will swell and burst.
Red blood cell water permeability is very..? Therefore..
High.
Pf/Pd ration =2.5.
This predicts a water pore in. (was very hard to isolate)
How was the RBC water pore eventually found? (part 1- until AB to)
Agre group found 1991:
Was studying the Rheus protein in RBCs but kept getting a 28kD proein co-precipitating. (1988)
Isolating this protein was hard but producted an antibody to the 28kD protein.
This AB also recognised a higher MW band (but not the 32KD rheus protein) and 2/3 times the size (exists as tetromers- cryoEM confirmed).
If treated with a deglycosylation enzyme- drop back to 28kD.
AB stained PT and thin decending limb (high water permeability)
How was the RBC water pore eventually found? (part 2- until calcualtions)
Agre group 1991:
The N terminus of the 28kD protein was sequenced (from human faetal liver) so PCR and library screening could be used to identify CHIP28 (AQP1).
Sequence analysis predicted 6TMD and 42% homology to waterchannel in the eye (AQP0- makes up 60% of lens is).
Both had tandem NPA repeats (suggested critical form
water pore formation).
Biophysical Calculations of water channels needed and number of CHIP28 in RBCs added up. And both resistant to enymatic digestion.
How was CHIP28 (AQP1) proven to be a water chanel?
1992:
CHIP-28 was expressed in xenopus oocytes and then the oocytes exposed to a hypertonic shock
In control oocytes the volume change is very slow.
In oocytes expressing CHIP-28 the volume change is rapid and the oocytes explode with in a few minutes. Renamed AQP1.
AQP1 is inhibited by? Ecidence?
Mercury sensitive.
1993 study.
Measured the volume of xenopus oocytes expressing AQP1 when exposed to hypertonic shock (water inflow) . Volume increase of 35%.
If add Hg- volume increase decreased to 15%.
If add ME (beta Mercatoethanol reducing agent which binds to cysteins so mercury cant) back to 35%.
Xenopus without AQP1 expression vol increase of 5%.
How does mercury inhbit AQP1? Evidence (2)? (not specific number)
Mercury binds to exposed cysteine residues of AQP1.
Know because treatment of B Mercatoethanol binds to cysteins so HgCl2 cant stopping the Mg inhibition (volume returns to 35% increase after 15% with Mg).
Also, If mutate 4 cysteins in the AQP1 and replace any with serine the water permeability increases after Hg treatment compared to when cysteins (cant bind and inhibit) But no impact on water permeability without Hg.
WHich aquaporin is mercury insensitive?
AQP4.
Exposed cystein that Mercury binds to? Evidence? (x2)
Cystein 189.
1993 Preston: If mutated cystein residues individually and see impact on mercury on the water permeability.
Results:
Normal function of AQP1 without HgCl2.
HgCl2 still reduced AQP1 function with mutated 3 of the cysteins, but not C189.
Savage 2007 study: Also.. If take bacterial AQ1 (HgCl2 insensitive) and engineer a C189 to it- forms crystals with Hg and now mercury sensitive.
AQP1 stucture?
6TMDs, with the B and E (between 2-3 and 5-6) loops not crossing the membrane but dipping into. These have the NPA motifs.
These two dipping loops cross over each other and make the pore between. This creates an hourglass like model.
4 subunits come together to give the tetromer- each making a pore through.
AQP1 have 4 pores or one central? Experiment method?
Made of 4 subunits coming together (6TMDs and have a pore in each).
Jung 1994. Made tandem dimers of either AQP1 subunits or C189s mutants.
mRNA injected therefore will be mix, could be all WT, all mutant or mix etc.
If mix would it give an intermediate phenotype ie 3/4 mutant- have 3/4 pores working etc, or if central pore will be all or nothing function.
AQP1 have 4 pores or one central? Experiment results?
Yung 1994-
Without mercury all channels gave functional water channels.
WT- mercury brings back to baseline levels.
Gave intermediate (25%, 50%, 75%) mercury sensitivities when mixed WT and mutant C189S subunits.
Concluded: Must be individual functional channels
WHat is surprising about how water moves through aquaporins?
There is no piggybacking of protons through, which would be expected, however there is a single file movement of water through the pore.
How is water transported in single file through aquaporins? Model for?
Predicted that watermolecules H+ bonds are broken and they bind to the NPA motifs through new H+ bonds which ensures selective water movement through which inhibits protons piggybacking.
Experiment of single file water movement through AQP1? Method:
NSF motifs in B (Asn-Pro–Ala) and E and a hydrophobic lining of the pathway for the water through.
Stochastic boundary molecular-dynamics (SBMD) method was used to probe the dynamics of particles ad the H2O moved through.
Experiment of single file water movement through AQP1? Results:
It was seen that the distribution of water density near the NPA motifs is significantly thinner, confirming that the narrower space around that region imposes a constriction to the flow of water.
Also hydrogen bonds with the polar (hydrophillic) side chains of NPA could be seen on the stereochemistry diagrams and were found to be essential. When in B loop the Asn and Asn were replaced with near-identical hydrophobic residues in the simulation, the aqueous pathways were broken completely.