Epi/Biostats Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

Cross-sectional Study

A

observational
assesses frequency of disease at a particular point in time
measures disease prevalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Case-control Study

A

observational
compares group with disease to a group without disease to look for exposure
measures odds ratio

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Cohort Study

A

observational
compares group with exposure that without
measures relative risk
prospective OR historical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Twin Concordance Study

A

compares frequency of disease in MZ or DZ twins

nature vs nurture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Adoption Study

A

compares siblings with bio vs adoptive parents

nature vs nurture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Phase I clinical trial

A

small # healthy volunteers

safety, tox, PK, PD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Phase II clinical trial

A

small # of pts with disease

efficacy, dosing, AE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Phase III clinical trial

A

Large # of pts, random assignment

compare to standard therapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Phase IV clinical trial

A

post-marketing surveillance

AE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Sensitivity

A

True Positive Rate=TP/(TP+FN)
probability of a positive test when the disease is present
high = low FN rate
SN-N-OUT (highly SeNsitive test, when Negative, rules OUT disease)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Specificity

A

True Negative Rate=TN/(TN+FP)
probability of a negative test when the disease is absent
high=low FP rate
SP-P-IN (highly SPecific test, when Positive, rules IN disease)
confirm after + screening test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Positive predictive value

A

PPV=TP/(TP+FP)
probability that a person with a + test actually has the disease
varies directly with disease prevalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Negative predictive value

A

NPV=TN/(TN+FN)
probability that a person with a - test actually does not have the disease
varies indirectly with disease prevalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Incidence

A
# of new cases/# at risk
during a specified time period
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Prevalence

A
# of existing cases/total#
at a point in time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Odds ratio

A

odds that the group with the disease was exposed to a RF divided by the odds that the group without the disease was exposed

17
Q

Relative Risk

A

Risk of developing disease in the exposed group divided by risk in the unexposed group
equals OR at low prevalence

18
Q

Attributable Risk

A

Difference in risk between exposed and unexposed groups

the proportion of disease occurrences that are attributable to the exposure

19
Q

Relative Risk Reduction

A

the proportion of risk reduction attributable to the intervention as compared to a control
RRR=1-RR

20
Q

Absolute Risk Reduction

A

difference in risk attributable to the intervention as compared to a control

21
Q

Number Needed to Treat

A
NNT=1/ARR
# of patients who need to be treated for 1 pt to benefit
22
Q

Number Needed to Harm

A
NNH=1/AR
# of patients who need to be exposed to a RF for 1 pt to be harmed
23
Q

Precision

A

consistency, reproducibility, reliability
absence of random variation (SD)
increases power

24
Q

Accuracy

A

trueness, validity

absence of systematic error or bias

25
Selection Bias
error in recruiting and assigning subjects | may correct with randomization
26
Recall Bias
awareness alters recall by subjects | common in retrospective studies
27
Measurement Bias
distorted info gathering | correct with standardized testing
28
Procedure Bias
subjects in different groups are not treated the same | can correct with blinding and placebo use
29
Observer-expectancy bias
when the researcher believes the treatment is efficacious | use blinding and placebo
30
Confounding bias
when a factor is related to both exposure and outcome but not in same causal path can match or randomize
31
Lead-time bias
early detection is confused with increased survival
32
Normal distribution
68% between 1 SD either side of mean 95% between 2 SD 99.7% between 3 SD
33
Type I error (alpha)
stating that there is a difference when none exists incorrectly reject the null hypothesis False-positive error alpha level
34
Type II error (beta)
the null hypothesis is not rejected when it is false stating that there is not a difference when one exists false-negative error
35
Power
1-beta probability of rejecting the null when it is false increases with sample size, expected effect size, and precision
36
Confidence Interval
range of values within which the true mean falls CI=mean+/-Z(SEM) 95% CI for p=0.05
37
t-test
difference between means of 2 groups
38
ANOVA
differences between means of 3 or more groups
39
Chi-square
differences between 2 or more proportions of CATEGORICAL outcomes