Epi Class 9 Flashcards

1
Q

Confounding

A

distorts or hides a relationship

When two exposures are related and that makes it look like exposure A causes the disease when really it is exposure B that causes the disease.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Effect modification

A

real effect is different in different populations

When different subpopulations with different biological responses are incorrectly grouped (means the RR or OR does not reflect the impact of effect modification)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

No 3rd Variable Effect

A

OR1 = OR2 = ORcrude (all equal)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Types of Bias

A

Selection bias

Misclassification bias

Information bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Selection bias

A

error due to systematic differences between those selected for study and those not selected for study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Misclassification bias

A

inaccuracies in methods of data acquisition may misclassify subjects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Information bias

A

bias in the way that information is collected from study participants (recall bias, interviewer bias, non-response bias)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Interaction

A

When the presence of two risk factors at the same time causes different outcomes than the presence of either one.

Can make both risk factors appear more risky or less risky than either really is.

Interaction can be additive or multiplicative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Confounding test steps

A
  1. Confirm that the potential confounder is associated with the exposure
  2. Confirm that the potential confounder is associated with the outcome
  3. Calculate crude OR between exposure and outcome
  4. Stratify by the potential confounder and calculate OR (or RR) for each stratum
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Mantel-Haenszel (MH) analysis

A

creates a summary measure that is somewhere between OR1 and OR2 and adjusts for the sample size in each stratum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Effect Modification test steps

A
  1. Confirm that the potential effect modifier is associated with the exposure
  2. Confirm that the potential effect modifier is associated with the outcome
  3. Calculate crude OR between exposure and outcome
  4. Stratify by the potential effect modifier and calculate OR (or RR) for each stratum
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The 3rd variable is an effect modifier if:

A

OR1 ≠ OR2 ≠ crude OR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The 3rd variable is a confounder if:

A
  1. Stratified ORs are equal: OR1 = OR2
    AND
  2. Stratified ORs ≠ crude OR
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Confounding Summary

A

Third variable effect:
distorts or hides a relationship

Evidence:
OR1 = OR2 ≠ ORcrude

Results of Breslow-Day test for homogeneity:
p > 0.05
- the strata (OR1 and OR2) are not different

Reporting: ORadjusted = ORmh
- use stratified analysis or multiple regression to find ORmh

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Effect Modification Summary

A

Third variable effect:
Real effect is different in different populations

Evidence:
OR1 ≠ OR2 ≠ ORcrude (none equal)

Results of Breslow-Day test for homogeneity:
p < 0.05
- the strata (ORz and OR2) are different

Reporting:
Stratum-specific ORs: OR1 and OR2 listed separately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

No Third Variable Effect Summary

A

Evidence:
OR1 = OR2 = ORcrude (all equal)

Results of Breslow-Day test for homogeneity:
p ≥ 0.05
- the strata (OR1 and OR2) are the same

Reporting:
ORcrude

17
Q

4 Causal Relationships

A
  1. Necessary and sufficient
  2. Necessary but not sufficient
  3. Sufficient but not necessary
  4. Neither sufficient nor necessary
18
Q

Necessary and Sufficient Causation

A

Rarely found

Example: exposure to an infectious agent causes disease in everyone with the exposure

19
Q

Necessary but Not Sufficient Causation

A

Example: infectious agent must be contracted to get disease, but not everyone who is infected will become ill

Example: stages of carcinogenesis- each step is part of the causal pathway, but no one step is sufficient to cause cancer

20
Q

Sufficient but Not Necessary Causation

A

Individual exposures are rarely sufficient, but multiple exposures could lead to disease

Example; radiation and benzene both can cause leukemia but are not necessary exposures

21
Q

Neither Sufficient Nor Necessary Causation

A

Complex factors that contribute to chronic disease

22
Q

Temporal relationship

A

exposure before disease.

temporal = time

23
Q

Strength of association

A

OR, RR far from 1

24
Q

Dose-response relationship

A

more exposure = higher risk of disease

25
Q

Cessation of exposure

A

removing exposure reduces risk of disease

26
Q

Specificity of the association

A

one exposure = one disease

27
Q

How to reduce chance of bias

A

use large sample size to reduce chance of bias

28
Q

Biologic plausibility

A

makes biological sense.

shark/ice cream

29
Q

Replication of findings

A

other studies show the same thing

30
Q

Consistency with other knowledge

A

Corresponds to other information published by the field