Equal protection Flashcards

1
Q

Level of scrutiny for race

A

As of Loving v. VA racial terms now trigger strict scrutiny

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Is de jure or re facto discrimination required for strct scrutiny?

A

Strict scrutiny is triggered only by a showing of de jure (by law)discrimination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When is De Jure discrimination shown?

A
  1. Term: race is used as a term in the statute
  2. Administration: there is evidence that the policy is not applied evenly
  3. Purpose: When there is a showing of intent to discriminate by race.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Washington v. Davise

Adoption of Test 21 for police hiring

A

Knowledge of disparate impact is not purpose to discriminate.

intention by knowledge, like in torts, is not applied here

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When will the court consider statistics in finding De Jure discrimination by admiration

A

Basically needs to have facts like Yick Wo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

degrees of underrepresentation as de jure discrimination

A

If a discrepancy is sufficently large, then it is unlikely that it is due soley to chance or accident, & w/o evidence to the contrary, once must conclude that race is a factor

De Jure as to purpose

This is inconsistant though. A panel of 11 white people and 2 blacks in Philly wasn’t enough.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Parents involved

A

Statutes can not use racial catagories to remedy de facto segregation, only remedial use is permitted.

“If the schools segregate de jure then you can desegregate de jure” -L.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Under incusion

A

claim that a statute is underinclusive means that not all members of the class causing the harm at which the statute is aimed are regulated.

Why aren’t you regulating them? They’re as bad as I am.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Over inclusion

A

Overinclusion means that a party that is regulated is not part of the class causing the harm.

Why are you regulating me? I’m not the problem.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When is a staute allowed to be over or under inclusive

A

rational basis but unconstitutional in all levels of scrutiny

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How may the gov’t fail rational basis

A
  • The government’s interest may be deemed not to be legitimate
  • the means pursued may be irrational
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Review for sex based discrimination

A

At least intermediate scrutiny. Must be Substantially related to achievement of important state objective. Closer to strict scrutiny than to rational basis review.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Real differences

A

For purposes of legal analysis race does not exist, but physical differences between sexes does but must be biological. There can also be discrimination to remedy prior discrimination against woman.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly