Equal protection (what class are they in) Flashcards
(45 cards)
age
not a suspect or quasi suspect class.
regulations that you need to retire at a certain age.
wealth
not a suspect or quasi suspect class.
A state statute says that low income housing can be in any community if a majority of voters pass the bill in your town…you challenge because you want the low income housing, this is rational basis/ based on wealth.
mental condition
not a suspect or quasi suspect class.
based on mental illness or an intellectual disability.
sexual orientation
not a suspect or quasi suspect class.
note that anti gay legislation will likely trigger rational basis with a bite.
Race, Origin and alienage
there are all suspect classes
child custody or child adoption law
look for racial purity issues that may motivate state officials.
forms that require race
if you are running for congress and the ballot requires your race.
segregation
two main areas are education and housing.
housing
a town puts the low income housing in the largely Black part of town. there was an example of segregation in prison to keep prisoners safe…this needs to be looked ath though strict scrutiny .
affirmative action (schools and other govt entities)
- many times schools for other govt facilities can get around affirmative action if they have had issues in their department in the past that they are trying to remedy.
- you need clear evidence that the discrimination actually occurred.
- redress by actions created by society as a whole is not enough.
affirmative action for college admissions
(preference to college admission)
can use race as a plus factor if applicants are tied, but cannot give them 20 extra point (university of michigan)
affirmative action by quota
inflexible quotas, dollar amounts or set asides are likely to be shot down.
race preference for High Schools
not allowed.
minority set-asides for govt contracts
generally struck down, whether if contract is state or federal.
layoffs
cannot have racial preference when laying off people
promotions (raced based promotions)
will be hard to pass strict scrutiny
gerrymandering by race
was race the predominant factor? is so this is not allowed to achieve a compelling govt interest.
creating a maximum number of Black voting districts
this is not allowed
police and operations issues
lets say that you need a lot of spanish speakers on the southern border. you enact a race conscious policy. this is not good.
stereotypes
intermediate scrutiny: a womans place is in the kitchen, men should pay alimony because they are the bread winner, children are rambunctious.
racial isolation
this is a tricky one: justice kennedy acknowledged that this could be a protected right.
affirmative action govt hiring
all laws that purposely discriminate are on the basis of race need to pass strict scrutiny: (plus factor as a goal to remedy past discrimination or to promote diversity) all are suspect. if using past discrimination it needs to be discrimination caused by the local govt entity that is trying to remedy for past abuse.
Affirmative action and benign purposes (do not confuse with other benign purposes)
Strict scrutiny: in croson the could look to see if the benign classification are not “in fact motivated by illegitimate notions of racial inferiority or simple racial politics” and to assure that they do not inflict stigmatig harm on those they are intended to benefit. this was contract set-asides for the city of richmond virginia.
Affirmative action and the Atterant case
all racial classifications, imposed by state, federal or local actors will meet strict scrutiny.