Equitable Remedies Flashcards

(26 cards)

1
Q

Shalson v Rossi

A

Two years for breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sports direct v rangers international F.C.

A

S abuse of process

If court not enforce breaches whole system weakened

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Coventry v Lawrence

A

Damages awarded in lieu of injunction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dering v Earl of winchelsea

A

Clean hands

Does not mean general depravity, must have immediate and necessary relation to the equity shed for, legal and moral sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Argyll v Argyll

A

Clean hands

A person coming to equity for relief must come with clean hands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Attorney general v observer

A

Remedy in vain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Lester v wood gate

A

Leches, undue delay

General equitable defence bars the grant of equitable relief when undue delay in assertin rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

AB v CD

A

Justice preferred injunction to prohibit breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Red land bricks ltd v Morris

A
  1. Strong possibility grave damage accrue

2. Damages not sufficient/adequate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Red land bricks ltd v Morris— negative injunction

A

A negative injunction is granted to prevent the continuance or recurrence of a wrongful act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Redland bricks ltd v Morris— quia timer

A

No harm but threatening and intending

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Venables v News group

A

Against whom? Identified party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Bloomsbury publishing v news group newspaper

A

Against whom?

Contra minding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Middleton v person unknown

A

Against whom?

Those fitting description

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

American cyanamid test

A

Serious issue
Prima facie case
Not frivolous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cayne v Global nature resource

A

What can the court do in its best endeavour to avoid injustice?

17
Q

Smith v inner London education authority

A

Special factors?

Public

18
Q

Mareva compania naviera sa v international bulk carries

A

No payment, freezing injunction granted

19
Q

BCS corporate acceptances v terry

A

A freezing order is not proprietary relief and obtaining security is not its purpose

20
Q

Anton piller KG

A

Search for computer pieces

21
Q

Entick v Carrington

A

Search order

Permission of defenders

22
Q

Patel v Ali

A

Specific performance would be refused as hardship amounting to injustice if granted

23
Q

Torquay hotel

A

Picket

Quia timet granted

Status qui

24
Q

Hubbard v Pitt

A

Balance convenience

25
American cyanamid—freezing order
Arguable case Disclosure Grounds believe asset in jurisdiction Grounds believing assets will be removed
26
Anton piller conditions
Prima facie Damage serious nature Clear evidence if incriminating documents Real possibility of destruction