Equity and the informal acquisition of title to property Flashcards

(25 cards)

1
Q

What does the equitable maxim “Equity looks on that as done which ought to be done” mean in relation to informal title transfers?

A

It allows equity to recognize rights where formal legal requirements have not been completed, provided the intent to transfer was clear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the four steps to assess property transfer in a problem question?

A

(1) Identify the property type, (2) identify the mode of transfer, (3) assess legal formalities, (4) determine whether equitable title has transferred.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the “every effort” rule established in Re Rose?

A

: If the transferor has done everything in their power to transfer the property, equitable title passes even if legal formalities are incomplete.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What equitable maxim prevents equity from helping where no consideration was given?

A

“Equity will not assist a volunteer.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is overreaching in equity?

A

A mechanism allowing a purchaser to take land free of certain equitable interests if the purchase money is paid to two trustees.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the difference between legal and equitable title?

A

Legal title involves compliance with statutory formalities; equitable title is based on intention and fairness, recognized by equity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is required to transfer legal title to land under s.52(1) LPA 1925?

A

A deed, unless exempted (e.g. by s.52(2)).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happens if a legal interest in land is created but not registered (s.27 LRA 2002)?

A

It takes effect only as an equitable interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does the case Walsh v Lonsdale establish?

A

A valid contract for a lease can give rise to an equitable lease even if not made by deed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the rule in Strong v Bird?

A

If a donor intended an immediate gift and appointed the donee as executor, equity may perfect the gift posthumously.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What’s the equitable principle in Re Ralli’s Will Trusts?

A

A trust may be constituted if the trustee later receives the property via another legal route.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How is equity applied to imperfect gifts?

A

Only under specific exceptions, such as Re Rose, detrimental reliance, or constructive trusts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is meant by “constructive trust”?

A

An equitable remedy imposed to prevent unjust enrichment, binding the conscience of the legal title holder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Under s.2 LP(MP)A 1989, what is required for an estate contract to be valid?

A

A written document, signed by both parties, containing all agreed terms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the requirements for an equitable freehold covenant to bind successors (Tulk v Moxhay)?

A

Must be restrictive, benefit dominant land, intent to bind, and purchaser has notice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Can positive covenants run with freehold land in equity?

A

No, only restrictive covenants can bind successors at equity.

17
Q

How can equitable interests be protected on the Land Register?

A

By entering a Notice under ss. 30–33 LRA 2002.

18
Q

What issue does the “registration gap” create?

A

It leaves a time window where legal title hasn’t been registered, potentially jeopardizing priorities.

19
Q

What statutory section determines priority of interests in land when a disposition is registered?

A

s.29 LRA 2002 (priority goes to interests protected by notice).

20
Q

What doctrine allows courts to prevent donors from revoking intended transfers if doing so would be unconscionable?

A

The doctrine of unconscionability (e.g., Choithram, Pennington v Waine).

21
Q

What did Re Fry [1946] decide regarding incomplete share transfers?

A

No equitable title passed because Treasury consent hadn’t been obtained before death.

22
Q

What principle did Mascall v Mascall [1984] reinforce from Re Rose?

A

Once the transferor has done all required acts, equitable title transfers—even if registration is pending.

23
Q

In Pennington v Waine [2002], why was the gift of shares held valid despite formal incompletion?

A

It would have been unconscionable for the donor to withdraw the gift due to reliance and context.

24
Q

What did Curtis v Pulbrook [2011] clarify about exceptions to the “no perfecting imperfect gifts” rule?

A

Identified three exceptions: Re Rose rule, detrimental reliance, and interpretation as trust declaration.

25
What issue arose in Baker v Craggs [2018] regarding the registration gap?
The court prioritized equitable rights of those in actual occupation over later-registered interests.