Equity & Trusts - Charitable Trusts Flashcards
This flashcard deck was created using Flashcardlet's card creator (34 cards)
s2 PAA 2009
Rule against inalienability does not apply to charitable trusts
Morice v Bishop of Durham
Trusts need to have identifiable Bs. Charitable trusts are enforced by the A-G.
Christ’s Hospital v Grainger
Gift-overs from one charity to another may fall outside the PP
s3 CA 2011(previously s2(2) CA 2006)
13 heads of charity
Pemsel’s Case
Original 4 heads of charity:
- Poverty
- Education
- Religion
- Benefit to the community
Re Coulthurst
Poverty need not mean deprivation; going short will suffice
Re Hopkins
Education must be of benefit to researcher/wider community of knowledge
Thornton v Howe
Religion does not require beliefs to be valid
Church of Scientology v Kaufmann
Beliefs must not amount to ‘pernicious nonsense’
s4 CA 2011
Purpose must serve public benefit
s4(1) CA 2006
Charities Commission must issue guidance on what constitutes public benefit:
- Benefits must be obvious
- benefits must be related to the aims
Re Smith
Limitation to a geographic area will be of sufficient public benefit
Re Girls’ Public Day School Trust
Public benefit excludes any organisation making a private profit
Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities
Class may not be connected by a ‘personal nexus’
Re Compton
Trusts for named beneficiaries will probably not be of public benefit
Re Koettgen
Preferential treatment may be given to one class, but not at the exclusion of others (75% max)
s11 CA 2011
Purpose must be exclusively charitable
Baldry v Feintuck
Trusts that seek to change government policy are not exclusively charitable
McGovern v A-G
Trust will succeed if political motives are only ancillary to aims
Chichester Diocesan Fund v Simpson
Imprecise wording will cause charitable gift to fail ‘charitable OR benevolent’
Guild v IRC
Courts may construe wording to allow purpose ‘or some similar [charitable] purpose’
Re Coxon
Courts may sever charitable/non-charitable purposes to preserve validity
Salisbury v Denton
Presumed equitable severance of 50:50 (equity is equality) unless trust expressly provides otherwise
Re Gillingham Bus Disaster
Uncharitable purpose gives rise to RT in favour of donors