Equity & Trusts - Charitable Trusts Flashcards

This flashcard deck was created using Flashcardlet's card creator (34 cards)

0
Q

s2 PAA 2009

A

Rule against inalienability does not apply to charitable trusts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Morice v Bishop of Durham

A

Trusts need to have identifiable Bs. Charitable trusts are enforced by the A-G.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Christ’s Hospital v Grainger

A

Gift-overs from one charity to another may fall outside the PP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

s3 CA 2011(previously s2(2) CA 2006)

A

13 heads of charity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Pemsel’s Case

A

Original 4 heads of charity:

  • Poverty
  • Education
  • Religion
  • Benefit to the community
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Re Coulthurst

A

Poverty need not mean deprivation; going short will suffice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Re Hopkins

A

Education must be of benefit to researcher/wider community of knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Thornton v Howe

A

Religion does not require beliefs to be valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Church of Scientology v Kaufmann

A

Beliefs must not amount to ‘pernicious nonsense’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

s4 CA 2011

A

Purpose must serve public benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

s4(1) CA 2006

A

Charities Commission must issue guidance on what constitutes public benefit:

  • Benefits must be obvious
  • benefits must be related to the aims
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Re Smith

A

Limitation to a geographic area will be of sufficient public benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Re Girls’ Public Day School Trust

A

Public benefit excludes any organisation making a private profit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities

A

Class may not be connected by a ‘personal nexus’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Re Compton

A

Trusts for named beneficiaries will probably not be of public benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Re Koettgen

A

Preferential treatment may be given to one class, but not at the exclusion of others (75% max)

16
Q

s11 CA 2011

A

Purpose must be exclusively charitable

17
Q

Baldry v Feintuck

A

Trusts that seek to change government policy are not exclusively charitable

18
Q

McGovern v A-G

A

Trust will succeed if political motives are only ancillary to aims

19
Q

Chichester Diocesan Fund v Simpson

A

Imprecise wording will cause charitable gift to fail ‘charitable OR benevolent’

20
Q

Guild v IRC

A

Courts may construe wording to allow purpose ‘or some similar [charitable] purpose’

21
Q

Re Coxon

A

Courts may sever charitable/non-charitable purposes to preserve validity

22
Q

Salisbury v Denton

A

Presumed equitable severance of 50:50 (equity is equality) unless trust expressly provides otherwise

23
Q

Re Gillingham Bus Disaster

A

Uncharitable purpose gives rise to RT in favour of donors

24
Re West Sussex Constabulary Fund
Automatic RT will not apply if impractical to return gift to donor, e.g. anonymous. Instead, it passes as bona vacantia to Crown
25
Re Rymer
Donor must show general charitable intention for cy-pres to apply
26
Re Spence
Naming charity specifically will defeat general intention
27
Re Harwood
Presumption of general charitable intention if donee never really existed
28
Re Faraker
Presumption of general charitable intention if donee has merged with another to carry on it's work
29
Re Finger's WT
Presumption of general charitable intention if UA no longer exists, but gift can be construed as for a purpose
30
Re Abbott
Surplus funds will be held on RT for donor
31
Re Osoba
Surplus funds will pass to B if it can be shown that donor intended to part with gift absolutely
32
Re Wright
If a purpose ceases to be charitable, the gift will always be applied cy-pres. It never returns to donor's residuary legatees
33
Re Slevin
Gift will be applied cy-pres if UA ceases to exist before gift can be made