Esophageal Carcinoma (EC) 🥡 Flashcards

(49 cards)

1
Q

Classification of Esophageal Tumour

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Differences between Adenocarcino and SCC of Esophageal Ca.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Incidence of Esophageal Carcinoma

A

80% aged > 60yrs old

Poor prognosis: Only 1/3 resectable. 5 year survival 19%.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Presentation of Esophageal Carcinoma

A

Asymptomatic : Early cancer usually detected on surveillance OGDS

Symptomatic (generally locally advanced)

Dysphagia (most common)
- Progressive dysphagia
- Frank dysphagia indicate locally advanced disease with circumferential involvement (>60% circumference)

  • Odynophagia (painful swallowing, often noticed initially with dry foods)
  • Iron-deficiency anemia - Lethargy, ↓ effort tolerance. Rarely present with UGIH
  • Hoarseness of voice - Vocal cord paralysis dt RLN involvement
  • Horner’s Syndrome - Damage to sympathetic chain of face. Miosis, ptosis, anhidrosis.
  • Constitutional symptoms - unintentional weight loss (10% or more in the preceding three to six months), LOA is significant.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

complication of esophageal carcinoma ( symptoms)

A

Complications

  • TOF (late complication) usually present with intractable coughing with recurrent pneumonia.
  • Stenosis – recurrent aspiration pneumonia.
  • Massive UGIH due to aorto-esophageal fistula. Invariably fatal.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Metastatic symptoms (advance disease) for esophageal carcinoma

A
  • Lung : SOB due to effusion or lung mets.
  • Liver : Jaundice, RHC pain, ascites
  • LN : Virchow nodes for COJ tumor
  • Bone : Bone pain.
  • Uncommon (< 10%) - cervical adenopathy, hematemesis, hemoptysis, or hoarseness from recurrent nerve involvement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Principle of management in Esophageal Ca ( or any other cases)

A

classify into: ( DNRK 2024)
1) Tumour (Resectability): staging of cancer, neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy, adjuvant therapy , definite Surgery ( subdivided into operation, Lymph Node (1,2 or 3 field lymphadenopathy - paraaortic, subcarinal etc), recontruction (conduit: Gastric -> Colon -> Jejunum)

2) Nutrition + functional (operability + Prehabilitation): SGA, establish feeding ( ENET, jejunostomy) , 6MWT, CPET , etc

3) Co morbidity ( Operability + Prehabilitation): CVS ( ECG, ECHO , HTN control), Respiratory (Lung function test - prep for opt as single lung ventilation needed), etc

Can start using :
“ given this patient showing sign of malnutrition and breathing rapidly - i would like to get lung function test, build up his nutrition ……”

🔥Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET):
Normal VO2max and AT Thresholds for Surgical Patients
VO2max:

Threshold: VO2max below 15 ml/kg/min indicates increased surgical risk, particularly in older patients or those undergoing major surgery.
Ideal for surgery: Higher VO2max (>20 ml/kg/min) is associated with better outcomes and lower risk.

Anaerobic Threshold (AT):
Threshold: An AT below 11 ml/kg/min suggests a higher risk for postoperative complications, including cardiopulmonary complications and longer recovery.
Ideal for surgery: Higher AT (>11 ml/kg/min) is linked to better outcomes and greater tolerance of surgical stress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Principle of esophageal investigation

A

1) Diagnose
2) Stage
3) Operability
4) Resectability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(1) Diagnositic investigation for Esophageal carcinoma

A

OGDS
- Determine location, circumferential spread, tumor length, COJ involvement
- Chromoendoscopy - application of stains during endoscopy to enhance tissue characterization.
- Lugol’s iodine, Methylene blue, Gentian violet.
- Lugol’s iodine reacts with glycogen components of normal squamous epithelium to stain greenish brown. Tumor cells have no glycogen → unstained.

  • Narrow band Image (NBI)
    • Light of blue (440-460nm - absorbed by capillaries on mucosal surface) and green (540-560nm - absorbed by capillaries in submucosa) wavelengths used to enhance detail of certain aspects of surface mucosa with the capillaries appearing darker brown or cyan.
    • Used to identify Barrett’s Esophagus.

Biopsy to confirm diagnosis.

  • ↑ accuracy with more biopsy, if result negative but suspicious lesion, to repeat biopsy
  • First biopsy – 93 percent
  • Four biopsies – 95 percent
  • Seven biopsies – 98 percent
  • Immunohistochemical staining is recommended in poorly and undifferentiated cancers (grade 3 or 4) according to the WHO to differentiate between SCC and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Morphological classification of Esophageal carcinoma

Sub Classification of Type 0 - Superficial Lesions

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Morphological classification of Esophageal carcinoma

Classification Type 1 - 4 - Advanced Esophageal Cancer

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

(2) Staging Investigation for esophageal carcinoma

A

1) EUS
2) CT TAP
3) MRI (optional)
4) PET-CT
5) Staging laparoscopy/ Thoracoscopy ( optional)
6) Bronchoscopy ( optional)
7) CTA Mesentry ( Optional)
8) Barium Esophagography

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

EUS ( EC)

A
  • High frequency ultrasound transducer (7.5 – 12 Mhz) to provide detailed images of esophageal masses and their relationship with the 5 layered structure of the esophageal wall.
  • Most accurate loco-regional staging
  • EUS to evaluate T and N status in patient who is candidate for esophagectomy (Sen 80-90%, Spe 90-95%)
  • Layers on EUS
    • First - hyperechoic and represents interface between balloon and superficial mucosa.
    • Second - hypoechoic and represents LP and MM.
    • Third - hyperechoic and represents SM.
    • Fourth - hypoechoic and represents MP.
    • Fifth - hyperechoic and represents interface between serosa and surrounding tissues.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

CECT TAP

A

Staging should include a complete clinical examination and a CT scan of neck, chest and abdomen.

  • CT cannot reliably delineate individual layers of esophageal wall and therefore cannot distinguish between T1 and T2 lesions i.e. depth.
  • N staging - overall accuracy 50 and 70%, Nodes > 1 cm in short axis dimension are considered suspect for metastatic disease.
  • Limited sensitivity for small metastases.

Findings:

  • Normal esophageal wall is usually < 3 mm thick at CT when esophagus is distended; any wall thickness > 5 mm is considered abnormal. Asymmetric thickening of esophageal wall is a primary but nonspecific CT finding.
  • Peri-esophageal soft tissue and fat stranding
  • Dilated, fluid and debris-filled esophageal lumen proximal to an obstructing lesion
  • Tracheobronchial invasion - displacement of airway (usually trachea or left mainstem bronchus) as a result of mass effect by esophageal tumor.
  • Aortic invasion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

PET- CT for EC

A
  • More sensitive (71% Sensitivity, 93% Specificity) than CT alone in small metastasis.
  • Avoid unnecessary surgery in 20% patients.
  • Can be used for restaging after initial induction therapy – restage, prognosticate.
  • Most common sites for distant metastasis - liver, lung, bones, and adrenal glands.
  • Less common sites - brain, subcutaneous tissues, thyroid gland, skeletal muscles, and pancreas.

PET-CT can be an option TRO distant metastasis in patients planned for esophagectomy

30% FN for Lymph node mapping ( PSS 2024)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Staging laparoscopy/ Thoracoscopy for EC

A

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommend staging laparoscopy as optional staging if non M1 and tumor at COJ

  • Main drawback is invasive staging requiring GA.
  • Advantage: Accurate TNM staging. Better than EUS.

Laparoscopic staging in locally advanced AC OGJ tumor. 15% of OGJ tumor has peritoneal metastasis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Bronchoscopy for EC

A

NCCN indication: Locally advanced non-metastatic tumors at or above the tracheal bifurcation to exclude tracheal invasion (10% patient with normal trachea on CT).

Tracheobronchoscopy indicated in proximal SCC (location at or above tracheal bifurcation) to rule out airway involvement or synchronous aerodigestive tumor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

CTA mesentery ( for EC)

A

Indicated in patient planning for colonic conduit for neo-esophagus (COJ tumors)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Barium Esophagography (benign appearance)

A

Benign strictures - typically have symmetric areas of narrowing with smooth contour and tapered proximal and distal margins.

A double contrast esophagram (also called a double contrast barium swallow) is called that because it uses two types of contrast agents to better visualize the esophagus:

🧪 1. Positive Contrast: Barium Sulfate
Barium is a radio-opaque substance — it appears white on X-rays.
It coats the lining of the esophagus and outlines mucosal surfaces.

💨 2. Negative Contrast: Air or Gas
Air or a gas-producing agent (like effervescent granules) is used.
This distends the esophagus and acts as a radiolucent contrast — appears black on X-ray.

🎯 Why use both?
The combination enhances contrast between:
The barium-coated mucosa (white)
And the air-filled lumen (black)

This provides high-resolution detail of:
- Mucosal patterns
- Ulcers
- Strictures
- Subtle lesions (like early cancer or Barrett’s esophagus)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Barium Esophagography ( Malignant appearance)

A

Malignant strictures - malignant strictures usually have more asymmetric irregular and nodular contours and more abrupt or “shouldered” proximal and distal margins with ulcerated mucosal surface.

21
Q

(3) Operability for EC

A
  • ECOG & ASA status
  • Cardiorespiratory function : ECHO, Stress test, Lung function test, ABG
  • Nutritional status (Subjective Global Assessment)

Prehabilitation
🍎Stress response- Hypertension, tachycardia, urinary retention, edema
🍎6 min walking test
🍎Hand strength grip test
🍎CPET

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) is a comprehensive, non-invasive diagnostic test that evaluates how well your heart, lungs, and muscles work together during physical exertion.
* Gold standard for assessment of individual exercise capacity
* Patient exercise on bicycle ergometer & physiological variables measured.

CPET assesses:
1) Oxygen uptake (VO₂): How efficiently your body uses oxygen.
2) Carbon dioxide production (VCO₂): How well your lungs expel CO₂.
3) Heart rate and blood pressure: Cardiovascular response to exercise.
4) Electrocardiogram (ECG): Detects heart rhythm abnormalities.
5) Ventilatory patterns: Breathing efficiency and lung capacity ( Lung Function: Flow volume loops)
6) Anaerobic threshold: The point at which muscles switch to oxygen-independent energy production.

  • Outcome is anaerobic threshold (AT)– when anaerobic metabolism occur & CO2 increase
  • AT > 11 ml/kg/min : low risk
  • AT 8 – 11 ml/kg/min : Need HDU or ICU care postop.
  • AT < 8 ml/kg/min : Very high risk. Preop optimization

If you have a MET score of 7 and above, fit for surgery
If you have a** VE/VCO2 score of > 42, fit for surgery ( CPET)**

Key Metrics in Upper GI Applications
CPET Parameter Clinical Relevance in Upper GI
1) VO₂ maxPredicts surgical risk and long-term survival post-cancer surgery.
2) Anaerobic ThresholdGuides prehabilitation intensity (e.g., target AT +10% for training).
3)VE/VCO₂ Slope Detects occult pulmonary hypertension or heart failure.
4) Heart Rate Reserve Indicates autonomic dysfunction (common in chronic GI diseases).

22
Q

Staging for EC ( TNM)

23
Q

TNM for EC

24
Q

Definition of Cardio Esophageal (COJ) / Gastroesophageal Junction (GOJ) Tumours

A

Physiologically - the distal border of the LES, as determined by manometry.

Endoscopically - the most proximal extent of the longitudinal gastric folds. Not the same as the Squamocolumnar Junction (Z- Line), located approximately 3 to 10 mm proximal to the anatomically defined EGJ.

Anatomically - at level of angle of His, point at which esophagus joins cardia of stomach.

Pathologically – on an opened esophago-gastrectomy specimen as the most proximal aspect of the gastric folds.

25
Important of Siewert classification for COJ Tumour
26
Classfication of COJ Tumour
27
Management of Esophageal cancer
🚨**Nutritional optimization before intervention!!** Divided into: - Superficial - Advanced for N:NPC - take 72g divide by 6.25g ( 1g N = to 6.25g of protein) - then divide by the NPC calculated 1g carbohydrate: 4 kcal 1g protein : 4 kcal 1g fat: 9kcal
28
Management of superficial esophageal cancer
Divided into: - Endoscopic Therapy - Esophagectomy with LN dissection **Invasion no deeper than submucosa (Tis or T1, N0).** - Incidence of early esophageal cancer in Asia is ↑ due to screening program. - Most important criteria for management - accurate assessment of disease extent & risk of nodal involvement. **T1a** - Risk of LN spread - 5% **T1b** - Risk of LN spread - 16.5% **Management Strategy** - **M1** & **M2** lesion or **M3** (T1a) with no LVI - **Endoscopic resection** - **M3** (T1a) with LVI or **SM** lesions (T1b) - **Esophagectomy** - Minimally invasive esophagectomy - Radiation +/- chemotherapy
29
Endoscopic Therapy for Superficial EC
Aim - preserve integrity of esophagus, providing potential curative options for superficial cancers. **M1** & **M2** lesion or **M3** (**T1a**) with **no LVI** **EMR / ESD** Best result achieved with: - Type : “low-risk” disease, including macroscopic types I, IIa, IIB, and IIc mucosal lesion. - Size : ≤ 2cm (EMR), ≥ 2 cm (ESD) - Grade : histological grades G1 and G2, and/or HGD ESD may have a lower local recurrence rate. Post EMR / ESD residual dysplastic lesion can be treated with repeat procedure or procedures below. Post endoscopic treatment stenosis prophylaxis - balloon dilatation, local steroid injection, or oral steroid administration.
30
Overview of Endoscopic Therapy for Superficial EC
31
Esophagectomy with LN Dissection in Superficial EC
Indicated for : M3 (T1a) with LVI or SM lesions (T1b) Surgery is the mainstay treatment! Advantage: - Precise pathological staging, Permanent removal of all Barrett’s mucosa at risk - Definitive treatment without need for post-operative surveillance or salvage therapy Disadvantage - Morbidity: 30%, Mortality: 5% **Radiation +/- Chemotherapy** • No role of Neoadjuvant CRT • Neoadjuvant CRT does not improve R0 resection or survival • CRT reserve for patient unwilling or unfit for surgery. CRT > RT alone. • Combination of Platinum and Fluoropyrimidines with RT; Standard 4 cycle Cisplatin/5FU +RT. Option 6 cycles FOLFOX + RT - Considered in patient with superficial cancer with liver cirrhosis & varices in which ER or Esophagectomy are contraindicated. - Muscle invasive cancer : CCRT is standard of care
32
Management of Advanced Resectable esophageal carcinoma
**T1 - T4a, N ± (**Celiac, mediastinal & supraclavicular LN - regional LN**), M0** **Stage II - III** - 30 – 40% potentially resectable at presentation. - 5-year survival 15 – 20% with surgery alone - Current guideline favors multimodal approach. • Surgery alone NOT standard; Incomplete resection observed in T3 (30%), T4 (50%) • Survival with surgery alone <20% even after R0 resection • Pre-operative CRT- more R0 resection and increase survival (Level 1A) • Combination of Platinum and Fluoropyrimidines + RT **Management** MDT & specialized unit (High Volume Centre - mortality 5%, morbidity 30%). Curative Intent – surgical resection Aim: R0 resection with **5 cm distal margin, 5 cm proximal margin** & **> 15 LN** dissected **Role of pyloroplasty** - LN dissection will sacrifice vagus nerve which ↑ risk of GOO. - Pyloroplasty ↓ risk of GOO but POMR & complication rate are similar to without pyloroplasty. **Feeding Jejunostomy** - Indicated for nutritional support pre CCRT & all patient undergoing esophagectomy. - Placement is 40cm distal to ligament of Treitz.
33
Role of Neoadjuvant/ Perioperative CCRT in Advanced Resectable EC
- Downstage : Improve DFS, OS - Downsize : Improve resectability ( increase pCR and R0 resection) - Neoadjuvant RT allow better tumor ischemia, contrary to post-operatively where field is hypoxic thus tumor radio resistant. - Early treatment of micro-metastasis( PSS 2024) - In cervical esophageal carcinoma, simultaneous laryngectomy is often required; therefore, preoperative chemoradiotherapy or definitive chemoradiotherapy is often undertaken in an attempt to conserve the larynx for vocal function. - Larynx-preserving surgery is indicated for patients in whom tumor has not invaded pharynx, larynx, or trachea. - For SCC, non-operative management with CCRT improve long term survival in 27% patients which is similar to patients treated with neoadjuvant CCRT & surgery. Adenocarcinoma • Meta-analysis (1A), advocate perioperative CRT with Platinum+ Fluoropyrimidines (8-9 weeks pre and post Op) • CRT > RT in histological response, R0 resection, lower LN Metastasis but not Overall Survival • Cisplatin/5FU considered standard (ACCORD 07) but recent evidence favor biweekly Oxaliplatin/5FU or Carboplatin/Paclitaxel (CROSS) due to lower toxicity (2 RCTs) • Surgery indicated even in complete response as evidence is limited on watchful waiting
34
Important Trials for EC
1) **Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy (MAGIC) Trial** [ISRCTN93793971, DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa055531] Resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach, esophagogastric junction, or lower esophagus Operable and Fit T2, T3 N ± Neoadjuvant ECF (Epirubicin, cisplatin, 5FU) x 3 → Restage (EUS + PETCT) + surgery (after 6 - 8 weeks) → (Epirubicin, cisplatin, 5FU) x 3 VS Surgery alone. - Significant Down staging and Downsizing of tumor - ↑ PFS & OS 2) Dutch- **ChemoRadiotherapy for Oesophageal cancer followed by Surgery Study (CROSS)** [Netherlands Trial Register, number NTR487, DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6] 75% Adenocarcinoma, 25% SCC. Operable and Fit T2, T3 N ± Neoadjuvant CCRT (Paclitaxel + carboplatin + RT 41 Gy) x 6 + Restaging (EUS + PETCT) on 3rd cycle & after completion + surgery after 6 – 8 weeks VS Surgery alone. 🍊Radiotherapy A total radiation dose of 41.4 Gy was given in 23 fractions of 1.8 Gy each, with 5 fractions administered per week, starting on the first day of the first chemotherapy cycle. (41/23 mneumonic) 🍎Chemotherapy Carboplatin - AUC 2 mg /ml/min - Paclitaxel - 50 mg /m * On days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29 - R0 resection higher in CCRT (92%) vs. Surgery (69%). - POMR similar. - pCR 29% CCRT - ↑ OS (50% vs 24% at 5 yrs) - ♦ Therefore CCRT + surgery is recommended for resectable T2/T3 N+/- disease. ♦ Generally preferred for esophageal Ca (SCC/AdenoCa) 3) **FLOT 4 Trial** - Trial compared neoadjuvant fluourouracil plus leucovorin, oxliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT) to ECF/ECX in patients with locally advanced junctional or gastric adenocarcinoma - 1/3 Siewert Type 1 GOJ - 1/3 Siewert Type 2/3 GOJ - 1/3 Gastric cancer *There was a significant improvement in overall survival in the FLOT cohort ( median OS: FLOT 50months, ECF/ECX 35 months) Median PFS: FLOT: 30months. ECF: 18 Months - as the result, FLOT has become the gold standard for neoadjuvant chemotherapy regime for EC and gastric ca. 4) **NEO-AEGIS Trial** - Compared perioperative chemotherapy ( n=184, 157 MAGIC, FLOT 27) with CROSS (n=178) - no significant differences in OS - improved pathological response in the radiotherapy arm did not translate into improved OS 5) 🥇LATEST Trial 2024 Prospective randomized multicenter phase III trial comparing perioperative che- motherapy (FLOT protocol) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CROSS protocol) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus **(ESOPEC trial)** - Patients with cT1 cN+ cM0 or cT2-4a cN any cM0 resectable EAC were eligible - Between Feb 2016 and Apr 2020, 438 patients from 25 sites in Germany were randomly assigned to two treatment groups (221 FLOT; 217 CROSS). - Median OS was 66 (95% CI 36 – not estimable) months in the FLOT arm, and 37 (95% CI 28 – 43) months in the CROSS arm. - In 359 patients with available tumor regression status, pathological complete response was achieved in 35 (19.3%, 95%-CI 13.9 – 25.9%) in FLOT and in 24 (13.5%, 95%-CI 8.8 – 19.4%) in CROSS. **- Conclusions: Perioperative FLOT improves survival in resectable EAC compared to neoadjuvant CROSS.** * RULE OF THUMB – JUST REMEMBER 5FU & CISPLATIN → SURGERY. PACLITAXEL ONLY IF PATIENT FIT.
35
Esophagectomy in operable advanced EC
Surgery depends on location of tumor: **Cervical Esophageal Carcinoma (SCC)** CCRT 1st line treatment. If pCR, surgery may not be needed. Treated as per head and neck SCC. - Surgery if failed CCRT - Resection of portions of pharynx, larynx, thyroid, prox esophagus & bilateral neck dissection - 1 stage & 3 phase op : Cervical, thoracic, abdominal incision with permanent trachy. **Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma** **Total** esophagectomy indication: - For all Squamous Cell Carcinoma - Tumors located in upper & middle third esophagus regardless of histology due to risk of submucosal skip lesions. **Subtotal** esophagectomy indication: - Lower third esophageal carcinoma - COJ tumors.
36
Types of Esophagectomy
1) **Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy** **2 stage** **subtotal** esophagectomy for **middle and lower third of esophagus**. 2) **Modified Ivor Lewis:** **Left thoracoabdominal** incision with intrathoracic anastomosis. 3) **McKeown’s (tri-incisional) esophagectomy** **3 stage** **total esophagectomy** for patients with tumors **located above the gastroesophageal junction up to level of clavicles**. 4) **Trans hiatal Esophagectomy** For tumors involving **lower third of esophagus and gastric cardia**. - **Orringer Technique** **2 stage** Trans hiatal **total esophagectomy** without thoracotomy
37
Ivor- Lewis Esophagectomy
**2 stage** **subtotal** esophagectomy for **middle and lower third of esophagus**. Disadvantage : intrathoracic anastomosis, 3- 20% bile reflux. Combined laparotomy followed by Right thoracotomy with intrathoracic anastomosis. - **Laparotomy** - mobilization of stomach, mobilization of esophagus within hiatus, gastric tube created, upper abdominal lymphadenectomy with resection of the lymph nodes along celiac trunk and splenic and common hepatic arteries. Either pyloroplasty, pylorotomy, pyloromyomectomy, or botulinum toxin injected into pyloric muscle to prevent postvagotomy gastric outlet obstruction due to stasis. - **Right thoracotomy** - azygos vein divided, esophagus and its adjacent mediastinal lymphatic tissue resected en bloc (periesophageal, aortopulmonary, subcarinal, left recurrent laryngeal nerve nodal groups). Gastric tube or whole-stomach conduit is then pulled up into the chest, stomach is divided at the cardia an intrathoracic end-to-end anastomosis is created between residual esophagus and gastric conduit. This is followed by a feeding jejunostomy. Esophagogastric anastomosis is placed as high as possible in the chest, above the level of azygos vein, to achieve the best surgical margin and decrease reflux.
38
Modified Ivor Lewis
**Left thoracoabdominal** incision with intrathoracic anastomosis. - Primarily for **distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction tumors** and provides exposure of superior abdominal and posterior mediastinal compartments through a single incision. - Extensive lymphadenectomy can be performed in abdomen and posterior mediastinum with this technique.
39
McKeown’s (tri-incisional) esophagectomy
**3 stage** **total esophagectomy** for patients with tumors **located above the gastroesophageal junction up to level of clavicles**. Abd-thoracic-neck dissection with cervical anastomosis with complete upper abdomen and mediastinal lymphadenectomy (2 field) or cervical LN (3 field) dissection. Most curative, higher risk, but with better ICU care & epidural analgesia, morbidity & mortality almost the same mortality 2.5 – 10%, morbidity 24-75%, recurrence rate 1-12%. - **Right thoracotomy** - patient in left lateral decubitus position incision in fifth ICS, esophagus and all of the adjacent nodal and, as necessary, mediastinal tissues are mobilized en bloc from uninvolved healthy mediastinal structures, leaving the esophagus in continuity. After surgical drains are placed, the chest is closed. - **Midline laparotomy** - patient in supine position, stomach and adjacent lymphatic tissue are mobilized in the same manner as with Ivor Lewis technique. A gastric conduit is created by using either a whole-stomach or a gastric tube, with or without a pyloric drainage procedure. Gastric conduit with the right gastroepiploic blood supply is brought to the neck through the left cervical incision. After removal of the esophagus through either the left neck incision or the upper midline incision (depending on the size of the lesion), the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is created followed by a feeding jejunostomy.
40
Trans Hiatal Esophagectomy
For tumors involving **lower third of esophagus and gastric cardia**. Major advantage - the potential to diminish respiratory complications by avoiding a thoracotomy and an intrathoracic anastomosis with a possible intrathoracic anastomotic leak. Disadvantages - increased rate of anastomotic leak for a cervical anastomosis, increased risk for subsequent stricture formation, and higher risk for recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Unable to do thoracic LN dissection & blind thoracic dissection. **Orringer** **2 stage** Trans hiatal **total esophagectomy** without thoracotomy - Supraumbilical incision - allows distal esophageal dissection. - Cervical phase - incision parallel to left sternocleidomastoid muscle for dissection of proximal esophagus. - Blunt dissection of esophagus in mediastinum transhiatally by insertion of surgeon’s hand through abdominal incision. Once the entire esophagus is mobilized, cervical esophagus is transected. Next, a partial gastrectomy is performed, and the esophagus is removed via the abdominal incision. Gastric conduit is then brought up to the neck through the posterior mediastinum to create a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis.
41
Principles of Operative Management for esophagectomy
**Open vs. Minimally invasive** - Benefit of MIE: Smaller incision, less blood loss, less postoperative complications, overall hospital stay, better pulmonary function - Uncertainty : - Controversy in adequacy of surgical margin and LN dissection. Long term outcome not established. **Margin** - Proximal & Distal : **SCC – total esophagectomy**, **Adenocarcinoma 5 cm margin**. - **CRM** : **Positive** margin if **cancer within 1mm of CRM**. - Positive margin has significantly higher 5-year mortality rates. **Hand sewn vs. Stapled Anastomosis** - Hand sewn (single/ double layer) vs. Stapled (circular or side to side linear) - similar anastomotic leak but **stapled has higher anastomotic stricture rate**. **Cervical vs. Thoracic Anastomosis** **Cervical** - higher leak rate (13%), but limited sepsis due to anastomosis leak and difficult to stent - ↑ RLN injury - ↓ reflux, more extensive proximal resection, - location outside RT field. **Thoracic** - Lower leak rate (7%) but leak associated with significant sepsis. - Higher risk of stricture. - leaks are more easily managed with stents - Increased pulmonary complications - Increased pain - Longer recovery
42
Conduit choices for esophagectomy
**Conduit choice** - Gastric > Colon > Jejunum **Reconstruction post Total Esophagectomy** **Stomach** - First choice: Ease of preparation, good blood supply, and adequate length single anastomosis. - Blood supply: Preserved right gastric and gastroepiploic blood supply. - Disadvantage: Regurgitation, reflux.
43
Role of Lymph nodes dissection in EC
- **Except for T1a tumor, all should undergo LN dissection**. - **Most important prognostic factor** - 60-70% patients have LN involvement at presentation. **Lymphadenectomy Extent** - **1 field** - **mediastinal** - **2 field - mediastinal**, **upper abdominal (peri gastric)** – 15 - 20 LN Western countries - en bloc resection of the mediastinal and upper abdominal lymph nodes is considered a standard for transthoracic esophagectomy. - **3 field - mediastinal, upper abdominal (peri gastric), cervical** - 30 LN Japan/Asian 3 field Lymph node dissection is done. - Recommended LN dissection for maximum 5-year survival (Japan) - T1 : 10 LN - T2 : 20 LN - T3T4 : 30 LN
44
Complication post esophagectomy
Non Surgical and Surgical causes: **NON SURGICAL :** **Pulmonary complications** – commonest, 20-30% - Tracheoesophageal fistula. - Lung injury - even without thoracotomy, due to elevation of inflammatory mediators in this major surgery, worsened during one lung ventilation, episodes of hypoxemia. Hypotension, increased fluid/blood replacement, inotropic support may lead to ARDS - Some studies showed reduced lung complications in non-thoracotomy approach - Atelectasis, pneumonia, postop pain control essential - Pulmonary edema - Early aspiration, might be due to damage of Vagus nerve, recurrent laryngeal, loss of cough reflex, airway protection **CVS complications** - Arrhythmias in post op day 2-4 might be a sign of leak - MI in old age **Pneumothorax or Haemothorax** **DVT** **SURGICAL :** **Chylothorax** - Clinical : Septic, whitish fluid from drain - Diagnosis : Pleural fluid analysis. - Serum CBC shows lymphocyte depletion - If only minimal fluid, can give full cream milk through NG as this will increase chyle. - Management: Conservative (50% success). Drain & NBM. - Once < 100ml/day allow feed with medium chain TG, low fat diet. - Failed (>500ml/day for 5 days or persistent leak for 2 weeks) → surgery. **RLN injuries** **Anastomotic leak** - **Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group – classification of anastomotic leak** - Proximal, stappler line, distal - **Type I:** Local defect requiring no therapy or treated medically/with dietary modification - **Type II:** Local defect requiring interventional but not surgical therapy (e.g. interventional radiology drain, stent or bedside opening of wound) - **Type III:** Local defect requiring surgical therapy **Conduit necrosis - Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group – classification of gastric conduit necrosis** - **Type I:** Focal conduit necrosis identified at endoscopy. - Treatment – additional monitoring or non-surgical therapy - **Type II:** Focal conduit necrosis identified at endoscopy and not associated with free leakage. - Treatment – surgical therapy not involving esophageal diversion - **Type III:** Extensive conduit necrosis. - Treatment— conduit resection with diversion **Bleeding** **Tracheal injuries & tracheoesophageal fistula** **Gastric Outlet Obstruction** **Benign Anastomotic Stricture**
45
Management of Unresectable Metastatic Esophageal Carcinoma
**T4a** : Potentially resectable **T4b** : Unresectable **M1** : Peritoneal, lung, liver, bone metastasis. **Patient unfit for surgery or refuse surgery** **Aim** Symptom control : Maintain swallowing ability, pain relief, bleeding prevention Disease control : To improve PFS MDT **Disease Control** Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment in palliative tumor - 1st line : Platinum based regime - 2nd line : Taxane - 3rd line : Gemcitabine - CCRT is the treatment of choice in potentially resectable tumour. * SCC follow RTOG 85-01 protocol **RTOG 85-01 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group)** ♦ Landmark study ♦ RT alone vs. CCRT (5-FU + cisplatin + RT 50Gy) ♦ CCRT ↓ LR, ↑ 5 years survival ♦ CCRT is the standard of care for patient with inoperable disease based on this study Adenocarcinoma follow CROSS protocol **CROSS trial** ♦ Neoadjuvant CCRT (Paclitaxel + carboplatin + RT 41 Gy) + surgery vs. Surgery alone ♦ Outcome R0 resection higher in CCRT vs. Surgery (92% vs. 69%). POMR similar. pCR rate 29%. CCRT ↑ OS ♦ Therefore CCRT + surgery is recommended for resectable T2/T3 N+/- disease. **♦ Paclitaxel act as radiation sensitizer. Has high response rate in metastatic disease.** -Contraindication for treatment : Size > 9cm, present of TOF.* **Trastuzumab is the 1st line therapy if HER-2 positive Adenocarcinoma (10-20%)** * Ramucirumab (2nd line) usage based on trial on gastric Adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW) * Pembrolizumab A.K.A Keytruda (3rd line agent) in Programmed Cell Death (pdl-1) positive patients with deficient MMR gene (KEYNOTE)
46
Symptoms control for Unresectable Metastatic EC
Consist of : - Relieve Dysphagia - Pain relief - Bleeding control - Tracheo-esophageal fistula Tx **Relieve Dysphagia** 1) **Endoscopic Therapy** a) **Stent** - preferred treatment for stenotic carcinoma or TOF. - Types: - SEMS (Self expandable metal stents) –nitinol (alloy of nickel & titanium). - SEPS (Self expandable plastic stents) – polyflex, Less trauma, ↓ risk of fistula. - SEBS (Self expandable biodegradable stents) – polydiaxanone. - Stent with valve : reduce reflux in COJ tumors. - Coverings - Covered – resist tumor ingrowth, ↑ migration rate. Help close TOF, leaks - Uncovered - ↑ tumor ingrowth, ↓ migration rate. - Risk : Perforation, aspiration, bleeding, tracheal compression, respiratory failure. b) **Dilatation** - Done by through the scope **balloon** or **Savory Gillard bougies**. - For temporary relieve and require repeated dilatation monthly. - Risk of perforation. c) **Tumor ablation** - **Laser** (Nd: YAG) - Laser induced fulguration of malignant tissue to restore luminal patency. - **PDT** (Photodynamic Therapy) - Photosensitizing agent with endoscopic low power laser exposure. - Easier & better tolerated than Nd: YAG - **APC** (Argon Plasma Coagulation) - Monopolar, non-contact, high frequency electrocautery using ionized electrically charged argon gas to induce tissue coagulation & tumor destruction. - Use alone or in combination with PDT 2) **Surgery** a) **Salvage Esophagectomy** - Only if R0 resection is feasible with good response to CCRT - No role in metastatic or locally advance disease in view OS < 6 months b) **Bypass procedures** - Gastro-esophagostomy proximal to tumor with colonic or jejunal bypass c) **Feeding procedures** - Feeding gastrostomy / feeding jejunostomy. Only if failed, stent. **Pain relief** - Multimodal analgesia according to **WHO step ladder** approach - **CCRT** can reduce symptoms **Bleeding** - **Endoscopy** (APC, chemical hemostasis) - **Hemostatic RT** - **Transhiatal esophagectomy** **Tracheo-esophageal fistula** - **Stenting** – covered stent.
47
Prognosis of EC
- Overall prognosis is poor. Overall all SEER stages combined 20%. - 5 yrs survival - Stage 1 : > 47% - Stage 2 - 3: 25% - Stage 4: 5%
48
Role of Immunotherapy in EC
- Recently **CheckMate 577 Trial** demonstrated improved survival with the use of the anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibody , **Nivolumab (Opdivo), a human monoclonal IgG4 antibody** in the adjuvant setting - Nivolumab is now recommended by NICE for completely resected oesophageal carcinoma in adults with residual disease in the resection specimen.
49
Basic of Chemotherapy