Ethical Principals found in The Nuremburg Code, Belmont Report & Declaration of Helsinki Flashcards
(39 cards)
10 ethical principals for human experimentation
Voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely necessary
The experiment should yield useful results for the good of society
The experiment should be designed and based on results of animal experimentation and/or knowledge of the natural history of the disease
The experiment should avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and/or injury
No experiment shall occur if death or disability is likely
The degree of risk should never exceed humanity
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the subject from injury, disability or death
The experiment should be conducted by qualified persons using the highest degree of skill and care throughout all stages
The human subject should be at liberty to end their participation in the experiment if they reach a physical or mental state where continuation seems impossible to them
The scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment if believed it is likely to result in injury, disability or death to the subject
Informed Consent: Participants must give voluntary, informed consent without coercion
Beneficence and Non-Maleficence: Research should benefit society and avoid harm
Scientific Basis: Experiments should be based on sound scientific knowledge
Avoidance of Unnecessary Suffering: Researchers must minimize suffering and risk
No Experiment Without Prior Animal Testing: Human experiments should follow animal testing
Avoidance of Random of Unnecessary Harm: Risks should be justified by potential benefits
Qualified Researchers: Only qualified scientists should conduct experiments
Freedom to Withdraw: Participants can withdraw at any time
Researcher Responsibility: Researchers are accountable for ethical conduct
Human Rights Supersede State Interests: Individual rights take precedence over state rights
Nuremberg Code Summarized
Developed in 1964 by the World Medical Association (WMA)
Set of ethical principals for medical research involving human subjects
Addressed primarily to physicians
Amended multiple times since its creation
Declaration of Helsinki
Respect for the Individual
Participant Welfare
Ethical Consideration Over Laws
Special Vigilance
a. Vulnerable individuals and groups require special protection
Thorough Scientific Knowledge
Ethical Oversight
Declaration of Helsinki Summarized
Created in 1979 to assure that research involving human subjects would be carried out in an ethical manner
Ethical principals and guidelines to protect human subjects
Created by the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research
The Belmont Report
Basic Ethical Principals
Respect for persons
Beneficence
Justice
Basic Ethical Principals of the Belmont Report
Practice
Refers to interventions that are designed solely to enhance the well-being of an individual patient or client and that have a reasonable expectation of success
Research
Designates an activity designed to test a hypothesis, permit conclusions to be drawn, and thereby to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. This is usually described in a formal protocol that sets forth an objective and a set of procedures designed to reach an objective
Ensure the study is approved by an IRB
Obtain informed consent from the patient
Ensure the patient understands the full extent of the experiment
Ensure the patient wasn’t coerced into doing the experiment via threatening or bullying
Be careful of other effects of the clinical trial that were not mentioned, and report it to the proper study coordinator if discovered
Support the privacy of the patient’s identity, and their motivation to join/decline the experiment
Ensure that all patients at least get the minimal care needed for their condition
Brief summary of the Belmont Report:
Belmont Report Question 2: Which of the following is an example of how the Principle of Beneficence can be applied to a study employing human subjects?
A) Ensuring that confidentiality is maintained
B) Determining that the study has maximized benefits and minimized risks
C) Ensuring that the selection of subjects includes people from all segments of the population
D) Providing detailed information about the study and obtaining the subject’s consent to participate
b) Determining that the study has maximized benefits and minimized risks
Which of the following best describes the principle of informed consent as described in the Belmont Report?
A) Comprehension, conflicts of interest, risk/benefit ratio
B) Voluntariness, risk/benefit assessment, selection of subjects
C) Risk/benefit assessment, justification of research, comprehension
D) Information, comprehension, voluntariness
d) Information, comprehension, voluntariness
The statement “In research on man, the interest of science and society should never take precedence over considerations related to the well-being of the subject” can be found in:
The Belmont Report
The Tuskegee Report
The Nuremburg Code
The Declaration of Helsinki
None
The Declaration of Helsinki
Study Declaration of Helsinki, Section III (4)
III. Non-Therapeutic Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects (Non-Clinical Biomedical Research)
4. In research on man, the interest of science and society should never take precedence over considerations related.
The Belmont Report’s definition “an activity designed to test hypothesis, permit a conclusion to be drawn, and thereby develop or contribute to generalized knowledge” refers to:
Practice
Research
Clinical Trial
Procedure
Experiment
Research
Study The Belmont Report:
Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research
(2) By contrast, the term “research” designates an activity designed to test an hypothesis, permit conclusions to be drawn, and thereby to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge (expressed, for example, in theories, principles, and statements of relationships). Research is usually described in a formal protocol that sets forth an objective and a set of procedures designed to reach that objective.
FDA Regulations on Human Subject Research Part 50 is for what? and what subparts?
Protection of human subjects
Subpart A – Definitions
Subpart B – Informed Consent
Subpart D – Protecting Children in Research
FDA Regulations on Human Subject Research Part 56
Institutional Review Board
FDA Regulations on Human Subject Research Part 312
Investigational New Drug App.
FDA Regulations on Human Subject Research Part 812
Investigational Device Exempt
FDA Regulations on Human Subject Research Part 11
Part 11 – Electronic Records, signatures
21 CFR Part 50, Protection of human subjects Subpart A
Subpart A: General Provisions (FDA and Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act)
21 CFR Part 50, Protection of human subjects Subpart B
Subpart B: Informed Consent of Human Subjects
21 CFR Part 50, Protection of human subjects Subpart C
Reserved
21 CFR Part 50, Protection of human subjects Subpart D
Additional Safeguards for Children in Clinical Investigations
A Short Form Informed consent is a statement not to exceed one page agreeing to participate in a clinical trial.
True
False
21CFR50 does not indicate length of the short form
Identify the manner in which the informed consent form (ICF) can be presented to the subject.
ICF can be read to the subject or the subjects LAR
ICF is handed to the subject to read and sign on their own in private
ICF is delivered via mail
ICF must be delivered electronically to the subject or LAR
a) ICF can be read to the subject or the subjects LAR
Study 21CFR 50.27(1).
(a) Except as provided in 56.109(c), informed consent shall be documented by the use of a written consent form approved by the IRB and signed and dated by the subject or the subject’s legally authorized representative at the time of consent. A copy shall be given to the person signing the form.
(b) Except as provided in 56.109(c), the consent form may be either of the following:
(1) A written consent document that embodies the elements of informed consent required by 50.25. This form may be read to the subject or the subject’s legally authorized representative, but, in any event, the investigator shall give either the subject or the representative adequate opportunity to read it before it is signed.