Eval, Assessment and Management of Brain Injury Flashcards
Model of Clinical Practice
-Exam: measuring
-Eval: taking the exam and implications (ICF)
-Diagnosis
-Prognosis: ICF, co-morbidities, environment
-Intervention: treat, education
-Outcomes
Internal Classification of Function
Health Condition: Stoke
Body Function and Structure: weakness, sensory, pain, location, tone, apraxia, executive function, BS issues
Activity: walking, sitting, speech, ADLs, IADLs
Participation: job, hobbies, ADLs, social
Environmental: home, stairs, bathroom, kitchen access
Personal Factors: insurance, support, money, depression
ANPT Neuro Core Measures
-Berg Balance
-Functional Gait Assessment
-Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale
- 6MWT
-10 Metter Walk Test
-5STS
-not always great for non-ambulatory
-should observe score and quality/compensations
-score on the lowest
ANTP Stroke Outcome Measure Recs
-StrokEDGE Recs: FIM, Fugl-Meyer, Postural Ass Scale for Stroke, Stoke Impact Scale, Trunk Impairment Scale
-Traumatic Brain Injury EDGE Recs
Stroke Impact Scale
-SIS
-subjective experience of stroke impact on life
-quality of life, impairments, activity limitation
-strength, memory, mood, communication, ADLS. mobility, hobbies, work
Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients
-PASS
-maintaining and changing posture
Functional Independence/Assessment Measure
-FIM/FAM
-general rehabilitation
-not specifically post stoke
-Activities Supine to transfers to locomotion
-Assistance or not
7:Complete Independence
6: Modified Independence
5: Supervision or Set up No hands on
4: Min Assist= >75%
3: Moderate Assist= 50-74%
2: Max Assist= 25-49%
1:Total Assist=0-24%
Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement
-STREAM
-progressive
-voluntary mmt of limb
-measure the quality of movement
-measures impairment and activity level
Fugl-Meyer Test
-sensory and motor function, function and limitations
-synergies, reflexes
Glasgow Coma Scale
-GCS
-3-15, Eyes, Motor, Verbal
-used at scene of accident, ER, acute care
-predictor of future outcomes
3-8: severe injury, 44%, coma
9-12: moderate injury, 15%
13-15: mild injury, 41%
Limitations:
-language barriers
-prexisting conditions
-alcohol
Eyes: 1-4, none, pain, speech, spontaneous
Verbal: 1-5, None, incomprehensible, inappropriate, confused, oriented
Motor: 1-6, None, extension, flexion, withdraws, localizes, obeys
Rancho Los Amigos Level of Cognitive Functioning Scale
1-3
- No response (no sleep/wake cycles)
- Generalized Response
-limited, inconsistent responses
-general reflexes to pain - Localized Response
-purposeful responses, follow simple commands
-lots of tubes
-asleep or awake
-high risk for skin breakdown and seizures
-NPO
-unstable vitals
-extreme hypertonicity
-GCS 3-8
-disordered consiousness
Rancho Los Amigos Level of Cognitive Functioning Scale
4
- Confused, Agitated
-heightened state of activity, confusion, disorientation, agressive behavior
-internal confusion
-violence
Rancho Los Amigos Level of Cognitive Functioning Scale
5-6
- Confused, Inappropriate, non-agitated
-alet, distractable, verbally or sexually inappropriate
-doesnt learn new info - Confused, appropriate
-good directed behavior**
- needs cueing but can relearn**
-memory problems
Rancho Los Amigos Level of Cognitive Functioning Scale
7
- Automatic, Appropriate
-out of PTA
-robot like
-minimal confusion
-shallow recall
-needa structure
-problem solving
Rancho Los Amigos Level of Cognitive Functioning Scale
8
- Purposeful, Appropriate
-alert, oriented
-cognitively independent
-function at reduced levels in society
-integrates past events
Rancho Los Amigos Level of Cognitive Functioning Scale
9-10
- Purposeful and Appropriate- Stand by Assistance on Request
- Purposeful and Appropriate- Modified Independent
Trunk Impairment Scale
-Static Sitting Balance
-Dynamic Sitting Balance
-Co-Ordination
Function in Sitting Test
-reactive and anticipatory balance
-Nudge, EO/EC, picking up behind, lat, forward, scooting
Movement System Diagnoses
- Movement Pattern Coordination Deficit
- Force Production Deficit
- Fractionated Movement Deficit
- Postural Vertical Deficit
- Sensory Selection & Weighting Deficit
- Sensory
Prognostic Measures
-Orpington Prognostic Scale
-Clinical Signs of Poor Prognosis post Stroke
CPG for Locomotion for Chronic Stroke, TBI, InSCI
-to improve WALKING
- Walking mod to high intensity (post stroke and SCI)
- VR Walking Training following acute onset (post stroke and SCI)
- Strength train >70% 1RM
- Stepping/circuit/cycling 75-85% HRmax
- NO static/sitting balance
- NO robot ass gait training
- Can use static of dynamic balance with VRf
CPG for Use of AFOs and FES (E-Stim) Post Stroke
FES and AFO: Quality of life, chronic walking endurance, other mobility, Dynamic Balance, Gait speed, Chronic Muscle Strength/Activation (may provide AFO)
May Provide FES and AFO: Acute walking endurance
Should Not provide FES and AFO: Tone/Spasticity
Types of Activities
Functional Activities: work directly toward functional goals
Contrived Activities: work towards functional activities but not directly to goals
Education
Predictors of Poor Rehab Outcome
Dementia
Global Aphasia
Previous Stroke
Older Age
Incontinence
Severe Visuospatial deficits
Persistent Sensory Defifits