Evaluation of Initial Therapy Flashcards

(27 cards)

1
Q

An Evaluation of Initial Therapy (EIT) Done to?

A

Determine patient’s response to periodontal treatment

Determine effectiveness of home care

Confirm tooth by tooth prognosis

Confirm decisions regarding further treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the EIT Parameters?

A

Gingival color, consistency, and contour

Plaque score

Probing depths

Attachment level

Furcation invasion

Suppuration

Tooth mobility

Bleeding on probing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why is 4-8 weeks the optimal time frame for evaluation of the periodontium post initial therapy?

A

Reestablishment of junctional epithelium

Repair of connective tissue

Microbial repopulation of sulcus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What changes in probing depth and attachment level are expected as a result of initial periodontal therapy?

A

Probing depth reduction: 1-2 mm

Attachment level gain: 0.5 mm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the significance of bleeding on probing (BOP) / Gingival Index (GI)?

A

Correlation with histological findings

Predictor of future attachment loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Anderson et al. (1991) find a significant correlation between?

A

Bleeding on probing (BOP) and histological inflammation at the base of the pocket

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Anderson et al. (1991) find no significant correlation between?

A

Visual signs of inflamed marginal gingiva and histological inflammation at the base of the pocket

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the purpose of the Lang et al. (1986 & 1989) studies on BOP?

A

To determine if there is a correlation between BOP and attachment loss > 2 mm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the outcomes of the Lang et al. (1986 & 1989) studies on BOP?

A

No BOP - 1.5% chance of progression

One out of four - 3% chance of progression

Two out of four - 6% chance of progression

Three out of four - 14% chance of progression

Four out of four - 30% chance of progression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the clinical significance of BOP in predicting attachment loss?

A

There is a correlation between BOP and eventual attachment loss; the absence of BOP is a good indicator for maintaining healthy periodontal tissue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does the presence of BOP likely indicate?

A

Subgingival plaque and calculus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the clinical risk when BOP is present?

A

Greater chance of future attachment loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What actions should be considered when BOP is present?

A

Reinforcing oral hygiene instructions

Scaling and root planing

Local delivery agents

Surgical access

Periodontal maintenance every 3 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does the absence of BOP indicate?

A

Healthy gingiva

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the clinical significance of absent BOP?

A

Little chance of future attachment loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the EIT Expected Response Decrease in?

A

Plaque score

Probing depth

Tooth mobility Improvement in gingival health:

Tissue color, contour, and consistency

Bleeding on probing

Decrease in percentage of sites with BOP

Decrease in gingival index

Suppuration

17
Q

What are some Clinical Scenarios at EIT?

A

No further ODCT periodontal treatment is indicated; periodontal maintenance phase is recommended

Further ODCT periodontal treatment (non-surgical or surgical) is indicated; patient proceeds with recommended treatment

Further ODCT periodontal treatment (surgical) is indicated; patient does not proceed with recommended treatment

18
Q

When does the maintenance phase begin?

A

At the end of ODCT treatment and is performed simultaneously with reconstructive phase treatment

19
Q

What are the goals of the maintenance phase?

A

Maintenance of probing depths

Elimination of gingival inflammation

Control and/or modification of etiology

20
Q

What may non-surgical periodontal therapy consist of?

A

Local drug delivery

Treatment of isolated residual pocket

21
Q

What are clinical indicators for non-surgical therapy?

A

Pocket free of plaque and calculus

Pocket depth (~5 mm) moderately manageable

Absence of a vertical bony defect

Occlusion therapy needed

22
Q

What are clinical indicators for surgical periodontal therapy?

A

Generalized residual probing depths

Need for access to subgingival calculus

Deep pockets

23
Q

What anatomical issues support the need for surgical therapy?

A

Vertical or furcation defects

Subgingival margins

Inadequate crown length

23
Q

What clinical findings indicate a patient is not ready for further ODCT periodontal treatment?

A

Only slight change or no change in gingival inflammation (BOP/GI)

Plaque score not improved

Less than 80% of surfaces plaque-free

24
What patient considerations may affect readiness for further treatment?
Desires Finances Systemic factors
25
What does palliative/compromised maintenance include?
Scaling and root planing Oral hygiene instruction Smoking cessation Local and/or systemic antibiotic therapy Host modulation
26
When is reconstructive phase treatment typically done?
Not until periodontal surgical therapy is completed