Eve Final Flashcards
(128 cards)
Codon bias influenced by
-mutational bias and genetic drift
Natural selection
Gene expression
Translational efficiency
Codon bias
No random usage of synonymous codons to encode a given amino acid
(Different codons that correspond to the same amino acid appear at different frequencies in the genome)
Codon bias example
Mutations from G to A and from C to T are TWICE AS COMMON
(Tends to favor accumulation of codons with A and T bases)
Natural selection as a cause of mutation bias
translation of highly expressed genes is most efficient when their codons correspond to transfer RNA that are common; so selection favors these codons
Can also favor codons that produce messages that are less prone to translation errors
Codon bias driven by selection
tends to be stronger in genes that are highly expressed and in species with very large population sizes such as free living microbes
Codon bias and population size
Species with smaller population sizes drift, overwhelms, whatever selection actions anonymous mutations, and codon bias is very weak or absent
STRONGER IN LARGE POP
Synonymous mutations weakly selected, in LARGER POP…
Selection MORE IMPORTANT; Ns»>1
SMALLER POP MORE INFLUENCED BY DRIFT
Male driven evolution
male germ line mutation rate is higher than the female germ line mutation rate, the Y chromosome is exposed to a more hostile mutation environment so its going to incur more mutations per generation
Y chromosome evolves very very fast
mutation rate. Is 3 x greater
Nonsynonymous sites are more
Clock-like than synonymous sites
dN
Non synonymous site
Expected dN/dS for a “typical” gene
<1
Expected dN/dS for a gene coding for an unconstrained protein
=1
Recurrent directional selection
dN/dS >1
What requires dN/dS»1
Very conservative test for adaptive evolution, as large numbers of selective fixations
Directional selection and evolution rate
Very rapid evolution
What does a smaller dN/dS ratio suggest
rates of protein evolution are slowed down by functional constraint
Recurrent directional selection ratio; dN/dS»_space;1
Very RARE
have to have a lot of amino acid changes going through under selection
Very frequent adaptive evolution has been acting on it
BIG dN/dS tells…
evolving adaptively - potentially its biology is changing
Examples of genes dN/dS >1
- Vertebrate immune system
- Viral coat proteins, other pathogens
- Reproduction related genes
More powerful way of detecting adaptive protein divergence (compared to dN/dS) ?
McDonald-Kreitman (MK) test
McDonald Kreitman test
Under the null hypothesis (neutral evolution), polymorphism and divergence result from genetic drift
Rapidly evolving proteins should also show high levels of protein polymorphism within species
Polymorphic and fixed a.a variants are compared to polymorphic and fixed synonymous variants
Can only detect recurrent adaptive fixations and can only reject if there are sufficient numbers of variants in a gene
A protein under very LOW FUNCTIONAL CONSTRAINT should show a lot of
Protein polymorphism
diverging very quickly between species
Gene under STRONG CONSTRAINT
should show very little polymorphism at amino acid level and show be evolving very slowly at the protein level between species
polymorphism is
positively correlated with recombination