Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE

A

TOPICS:

Witnesses
Judge & Jury
Objections & Offers of Proof
Burden of Persuasion & Production
Impeachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lay Witnesses

(1) Who can be a lay witness
(2) What can/cannot lay witnesses testify about?

A
  1. Anyone, including children, can be a lay witness (except judge or jury)
  2. Can testify as to knowledge/perception, but not expert opinions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Expert Witnesses

(1) What must the lawyer do?
(2) Is outside evidence permissible?
(3) What can/cannot expert witnesses testify about?

A

1) Must lay foundation/qualify expert
2) Expert can use outside evidence
3) Expert can give opinion on conclusions; Expert cannot give opinion on mental state of defendant if element of crmie

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Control of Witnesses

A

The Court can take steps to keep “reasonable control”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Leading Questions

(1) When are they not allowed?
(2) When are they allowed

A

(1) Not allowed on Direct
(2) Allowed:
- Cross Exam
- Hostile witness
- Adverse party,
- Shy witness/child
- Jog memory
- Lay foundation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Refreshing Memory/Recollection

(1) What can you show?
(2) Can it be read into evidence?

A

(1) May show anything to a witness
(2) Cannot be read into evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Judge & Jury

(1) What does the Judge handle?
(2) What does the jury handle

A

(1) Judge: rules of law + admissibility
vs
(2) Jury: questions of fact + weight of evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Objections and Offers of Proof

(1) What is an Objection to Admission?
(2) What is an Offer of Proof?

A

(1) Objection to admission: must be timely and lawyer states grounds for objection
(2) Offer of proof: evidence was actually excluded and lawyer preserves for appeal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Burden of Persuasion & Production

(1) What is the Burden of Production?
(2) What is the Burden of Persuasion?

A

(1) Burden of Persuasion: P must prove each element

vs

(2) Burden of Production:
- Civil: Preponderance
- Criminal: BaRD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Presumptions

(1) What is a presumption?
(2) What is a rebuttable presumption?
(3) What is a conclusive presumption?

A

(1) Presumption: A conclusion a judge must come to once a party meets its burden

(2) Rebuttable Presumption:
* If prsmpt WAS rebutted - Jury MAY conclude

  • If prsmpt NOT rebutted - Jury MUST conclude

(3) Conclusive Presumption: Jury MUST conclude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Character vs Impeachment

Character Evidence:

1) WHO is Character Evidence about?
2) WHAT is Character Evidence
3) Is Character Evidence generally admissible?

Impeachment:

4) WHO is Impeachment about?
5) WHAT is Impeachment about?
6) Is Impeachment generally admissible?

A

Character Evidence:

1) Character evidence is about the DEFENDANT.
2) Character evidence is about bad things D did in the past.
3) Character evidence is generally NOT ADMISSIBLE.

Impeachment:

1) Impeachment is about WITNESS ON THE STAND (including the Defendant, if he takes the stand).
2) Impeachment is about attacking W’s CREDIBILITY.
3) Impeachment evidence is GENERALLY ADMISSIBLE.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Impeachment

When may you impeach by:

(1) Prior Felony Convictions?

(2) Prior F or M Convictions regarding Honesty/Truthfulness?

(3) Prior NON-Convictions (Bad Acts)?

A

(1) You may impeach by Prior Felony CONVICTION if it occurred within 10 years and passes balancing test.

(2) You may ALWAYS impeach by Prior F or M CONVICTION regarding honesty/truthfulness, and it may be proved by rep/op/acts.

(3) You may ONLY impeach by prior NON-Conviction (Bad Acts) if it relates to honesty/truthfulness, and you may NOT use extrinsic evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When may a statement be used as Impeachment AND Substantive Evidence?

A

ONLY if (1) admissible impeachment AND (2) not hearsay.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

RELEVANCY & EXCLUDING RELEVANT EVIDENCE

A

TOPICS:

Relevant Evidence
Authentication
Character Evidence
Habit Evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Relevant Evidence

(1) What makes evidence relevant?
(2) When may relevant evidence nonetheless be excluded?

A

(1) Any tendency to make a fact more or less probable. Generally admissible.
(2) Unfairly prejudicial, misleading or confusing, causes delay.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Authentication

(1) What must be shown?
(2) How do you authenticate?
(3) What evidence is self-authenticating?

A

(1) Must show “the evidence is what it purports to be”

(2) By direct testimony, by special markings, by testimony with PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE

(3) Official/Notarized Documents, NEWSPAPERS, Seals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Character Evidence

What is Character Evidence?

A

Character evidence: bad things DEFENDANT did in the past. Generally NOT admissible, too prejudicial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Character Evidence

Character ADMISSIBLE in CIVIL CASES When?

(1) _______________; (1), (2), (3), (4)
(2)

If ADMISSIBLE, how may it be proved?

A

(1) When at issue; (1) Defamation, (2) Child Custody, (3) Negligent Entrustment, (4) Misrep/Fraud

(2) To show MIMIC (not propensity)

Motive
Intent
Mistake (absence of)
Identification
Common Plan or Scheme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Character Evidence

When is Character Evidence NEVER admissible:

(1) in CIVIL cases?

(2) in CRIMINAL cases?

A

(1) Civil: When character evidence is NOT at issue AND it is not used to show MIMIC

(2) Criminal: before Defendant OPENS THE DOOR

20
Q

Character Evidence

(1) Self-Defense Claim

(2) Prior Sexual Acts

A

(1) D can show P was INITIAL AGGRESSOR
(2) P can bring in OTHER INSTANCES of these acts

21
Q

Habit Evidence

(1) What is Habit Evidence?

(2) How can you prove habit?

A

(1) AKA “Routine Practice”
Must be done ALL the time

(2) ONLY though opinion/acts. Habit CANNOT be proved through REPUTATION.

22
Q

Attorney/Client Privilege

A

1) There must be a RELATIONSHIP
2) Applies to ANYONE who works for the attorney
3) Lasts FOREVER
4) Communication must be CONFIDENTIAL

5) Privilege is held by the CLIENT

23
Q

Work Product

A

Generally protected by Attorney/Client Privilege

24
Q

EXCEPTIONS to Attorney/Client Privilege

A

Getting advice on how to commit a crime

Dispute between Attorney & Client

25
Q

Doctor/Patient Privilege

A

Statements ABOUT treatment or diagnosis

Others can be present to assist doctor (nurse) or patient (mom)

26
Q

EXCEPTIONS to Doctor/Patient Privilege

A

1) Patient puts his condition at issue
2) Dispute between Doctor & Patient

27
Q

Spousal COMMUNICATION Privilege

A

Protects confidential information disclosed during marriage. Have to have been married.

Survives divorce.

Applies to all cases.

EITHER Spouse may exert it.

BOTH Spouses must waive.

28
Q

Spousal TESTIMONY Privilege

A

Prevents a spouse from testifying.

Applies ONLY to CRIMINAL cases.

Must be married a trial for it to apply.

ENDS upon divorce.

Witness-Spouse holds the privilege (their choice).

29
Q

EXCEPTIONS to BOTH Spousal Privileges

A

Statements about FUTURE crimes
Statements about child/spouse abuse

30
Q

Judicial Notice

(1) What is judicial notice?
(2) When MUST a judge take judicial notice?
(3) When MAY a judge take judicial notice?

A

1) Stuff that is not subjected to dispute

2) if a party request him to do so

3) At any time

31
Q

Judicial Notice of Law

(1) What law MUST the judge take judicial notice of?

(2) What law MAY the judge take judicial notice of

A

1) Federal or state law
2) Foreign law or municipal ordinance

32
Q

Judicial Notice of Jury Instructions

1) Civil
2) Criminal

A

1) Jury MUST accept as conclusive
2) Jury MAY accept as conclusive

33
Q

PRIVILEGES AND OOTHER POLICY EXCLUSIONS

A
34
Q

Public Policy Exclusions

Subsequent Remedial Measures

A

Evidence that something was fixed after an accident.

NOT ADMISSIBLE to show negligence.

35
Q

Public Policy Exclusions

EXCEPTION to Subsequent Remedial Measures

A

Admissible to show OWNERSHIP or CONTROL

36
Q

Public Policy Exclusions

Liability Insurance

A

NOT admissible to show negligence.
MAY be admissible to show bias.

37
Q

Public Policy Exclusions

Compromise/Settlement Offer

A

NOT admissible. But there must be a LEGAL DISPUTE for the privilege to exist (not an offer to pay $10k after a car accident).

38
Q

Public Policy Exclusions

Compromise/Settlement Offer COUPLED WITH an ADMISSION

A

It does not matter. The WHOLE statement is inadmissible.

39
Q

Public Policy Exclusions

Offer to Pay Medical Expenses

A

NOT admissible.

40
Q

Public Policy Exclusions

Offer to Pay Medical Expenses COUPLED WITH an ADMISSION

A

Severed –> the ADMISSION is ADMISSIBLE.

41
Q

Public Policy Exclusions

Plea Negotiation Statements

A

Almost always NOT admissible.

Only admissible if COUPLED WITH an admissible statement and FAIR

42
Q

Public Policy Exclusions

Past Sexual Conduct of Victmi

A

Not admissible, unless

Criminal Case + consent, protects constitutional rights, or the source of any physical evidence

Civil Case + ONLY if probative>prej

43
Q

WRITINGS, RECORDINGS, AND PHOTOGRAPHS

A
44
Q

Best Evidence Rule

What is it?

What is the exception?

A

The Best Evidence is the original.

The Best Evidence Rule does not apply to objects.

Exception to BER –> original item is lost or destroyed, you may use a copy if it AUTHENTICATED (no evidence of tampering)

45
Q

Best Evidence Rule

When does it apply?

A

(1) To prove the contents of a document

(2) To prove the testimony being given

46
Q

Rule of Completeness

What is it?

A

When admitting a portion, the whole document may be admitted for fairness (so long as it is relevant).