Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Bar Exam > Evidence > Flashcards

Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

Admissible

A

allowed to be presented at trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Evidence is relevant if (2)

A
  1. it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without it AND 2. the fact is of consequence in determining the action
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The court may exclude relevant evidence if its

A

probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of unfair prejudice, misleading the jury, confusing the issues, undue delay, wasting time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Evidence of subsequent remedial measures is not admissible to prove (4)

A
  1. negligence
    b) culpable conduct
    c) a defect n a product or design
    d) a need for a warning or instruction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evidence of subsequent remedial measures is admissible to prove (4)

A
  1. impeachment
  2. control
  3. ownership4.
  4. feasibility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Statements and offers made during settlement negotiations are NOT admissible to (2)

A
  1. prove or disprove the validity or amount of a disputed claim OR
  2. impeach by a prior inconsistent statement or contradiction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Statements and offers made during settlement negotiations are admissible to prove (3)

A
  1. witness bias/prejudice
  2. negating a contention of undue delay
  3. proving obstruction of justice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Plea Negotiations: The following are NOT admissible against a D in a subsequent civil or criminal case (4)

A
  1. statements made during plea discussions
  2. a nolo contendere plea (D doesn’t admit to a dispute or charge)
  3. later withdrawn guilty plea
  4. statements made during an above 2 or 3 proceeding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Paying/offering to pay medical expenses are not admissible to prove liability for injury, but…..are admissible

A

related statements or factual admissions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evidence of insurance or lack thereof is not admissible to prove culpability but it is admissible for other purposes (5)

A

witness bias/prejudice, agency, ownership, control, motive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How may physical evidence be authenticated (2)

A

through witness testimony or by evidenced that shows it has been held in a substantially unbroken chain of custody

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Voice recordings may be authenticated by (2)

A

anyone who has heard the person speak and identified the recorded person as the speaker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Exceptions to the best evidence rule: the original writing, recording, or photograph is required to prove its content UNLESS (5)

A
  1. its a reliable duplicate (a photocopy)
  2. all the originals are lost or destroyed and not by the offering party acting in bad faith
  3. an original cannot be obtained by judicial process
  4. it was not produced after proper notice was given to the party in control and against whom it would be offered against, OR
  5. it’s not closely related to a controlling issue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Character evidence is generally not admissible to prove

A

propensity (that a person acted in conformity with a character trait on a particular occasion)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

BUT, character evidence is generally allowed for (2)

A
  1. non-propensity purposes or when character is in issue— it’s an essential element or ultimate issue of a charge, claim, or defense (e.g. defamation, negligent entrustment)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In criminal cases, if a D’s character may offer evidence of their own character trait, the prosecution cannot offer character evidence of D unless D

A

first offers admissible evidence for that character trait (D “opens the door”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Prosecution may introduce D’s prior acts of _______ or ______ when D is accused of such conduct

A

sexual assault/child molestation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

In a non sex-offense case, a D may offer evidence of victim’s character (to establish a defense or show D’s innocence). If D presents such evidence, prosecution may offer evidence of (2)

A

victim’s good character (for the same trait) or D’s bad character (for the same trait)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

In a homicide case, the prosecution may offer evidence of victim’s peacefulness only if

A

D claims victim was the first aggressor (self-defense)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Evidence is not admissible to prove a victim’s sexual behavior or predisposition except when (3)

A
  1. evidence of victim’s sexual behavior if offered to prove D was not involved in the sex crime (not the source of semen)
  2. evidence of sexual relations between D and victim either to prove consent (if offered by D) or for any reason (if offered by prosecution) OR
  3. if its exclusion violates D’s constitutional rights
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

In civil cases, character evidence to prove propensity is not/admissible

A

not admissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

In civil sex-offense cases, evidence of a victim’s sexual behavior or predisposition is admissible only if its probative value substantially outweighs the danger of (2)

A

harm to any victim AND unfair prejudice to any party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Specific acts or instances are only allowed (2)

A
  1. on cross of a character witness 2. if character in issue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Prior bad acts are admissible for non-propensity purposes (7)

A

motive, identity, absence of mistake/accident, intent, common plan or scheme, opportunity, or preparation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

To offer such evidence of prior bad acts, the proponent must show that (3)

A
  1. the prior act was committed (by preponderance of evidence)
  2. the probative value substantially outweighs the danger of unfair prejudice AND
  3. proper notice in criminal cases (at least 15 days notice unless good cause shown)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Habit/routine practice

A

behavior that’s specific, repeated, and reflexive, that is admissible to show that a person (or organization) acted in accordance with their habit or routine practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Impeachment

A

attack witness’s credibility at trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Prior inconsistent statements are admissible to impeach a witness. Need not ____ contacts of the statement to witness during examination, but must _____ to adverse party’s attorney upon request

A

show

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Extrinsic evidence is admissible only if 2

A

relevant to material issue at trial (one other than witness’s credibility) AND proper foundation is shown (witness is first given an opportunity to explain or deny the statement and an adverse party is given an opportunity to examine a witness about it )

*****Does not apply when extrinsic evidence offered against party opponent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Evidence of a prior felony or misdemeanor involving dishonest are always admissible to

A

impeach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Other misdemeanors are not/admissible to impeach

A

not admissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

In civil and criminal cases, felonies that do not involve dishonesty are admissible if

A

witness is not a criminal defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

In criminal cases, felonies that do not involve dishonesty are admissible if D is the witness but only if

A

probative value outweighs any prejudicial effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

10 year exception

A

If ten years have passed (from conviction or release from jail, whichever is later), the conviction is not admissible unless its probative value outweighs its prejudicial effect and the proponent provides reasonable written notice to the adverse party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

A felony is a crime punishable by (2)

A

death or imprisonment over a year

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

A witness’s credibility may be attacked on cross with specific instances of conduct (Prior bad acts) ONLY IF the

A

conduct is probative of the witness’s character for truthfulness or untruthfulness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

_____ evidence is never admissible to attack or support the instances of a witness’s credibility

A

extrinsic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

a witness’s credibility may be attacked or supported by (2)

A
  1. reputation testimony about the witness’s character for truthfulness/untruthfulness OR opinion testimony
39
Q

Evidence of the witness’s truthful character is only admissible

A

after attacked

40
Q

A witness’s ability to observe, remember, or relate facts accurately may be attacked on impeachment. Is extrinsic evidence admissible for this purpose?

A

Yes

41
Q

A witness’s _____, ____, _______, or _______ are ALWAYS admissible for impeachment

A

bias, motive, partiality, or corruption

42
Q

Evidence (including hearsay) is admissible to impeach regardless of when/whether declarant had an opportunity to

A

explain or deny it

43
Q

Refreshing a witness’s recollection using a document is permitted when the witness

A
  1. once had personal knowledge of the matter but
  2. is unable to recall it while testifying
44
Q

Only the _____ _____ may offer into evidence the item used to refresh (unless it’s admissible on other grounds )

A

opposing party

45
Q

A court may take judicial notice of indisputable facts (2)

A
  1. commonly known in the community OR
  2. readily capable of verification and that cannot be reasonably questioned
46
Q

In civil cases, a court must instruct the jury to accept the judicially noticed fact as _______

A

conclusive

47
Q

In criminal cases, the court must instruct the jury that it——-the noticed fact as conclusive

A

may or may not accept

48
Q

Lay witness testimony is admissible if the witness is (2)

A
  1. competent to testify AND
  2. has personal knowledge of the matter
49
Q

Lay witness may offer opinion only if it’s (3)

A
  1. rationally based on perception
  2. helpful to clearly understand the testimony or determine a fact (not a legal conclusion) AND
  3. not based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge
50
Q

Expert testimony is permitted when

A
  1. witness is qualified as an expert
  2. testimony is helpful to the trier of fact
  3. testimony is based on sufficient facts and data
  4. testimony is based on reliable principles and methods AND
  5. witness has reasonably applied the principles/methods to the facts of the case
51
Q

Hearsay is

A

an out of court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted

52
Q

Statement

A

A person’s oral or written assertion. Can include nonverbal acts if they are intended as assertions

53
Q

Multiple hearsay

A

each level of hearsay must fall within an exception or exclusion to be admissible

54
Q

Non-hearsay

A

If a statement is offered to prove something other than the truth of the statement, it’s not hearsay and is admissible

55
Q

Hearsay exceptions: Statements by a party opponent

A

Any statement offered against an opposing party AND the is made by the party, adopted or believed to be true by the party (silence may be sufficient), made by an authorized person, made by an agent/employee of the party acting within their scope, OR made by a co-conspirator

56
Q

A prior statement by a declarant-witness is deemed non-hearsay if

A
  1. declarant testified
  2. declarant is subject to cross examination about the prior statement AND
  3. prior statement was inconsistent with prior testimony and given under oath in prior court proceeding/declarant identifies a person as someone they perceived earlier OR is consistent with prior testimony and is offered either to rebut that the declarant is lying or to rehabilitate declarant’s credibility
57
Q

Hearsay exceptions: Co-Conspirator admission. Admissible when offered against another co-conspirator if (4)

A
  1. conspiracy existed between the declarant and defendant
  2. statement was made during the conspiracy
  3. statement was made in furtherance of the conspiracy AND
  4. the conspiracy is proven by independent evidence (outside of the statements themselves)
58
Q

Hearsay exceptions: Present sense impression. A statement describing an event made by the declarant (2)

A
  1. while observing the event OR 2. immediately thereafter
59
Q

Hearsay exceptions: excited utterance. A statement related to (2)

A
  1. a startling event or condition
  2. made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement that the event/condition occurred
60
Q

Hearsay exceptions: Business records. (6)

A
  1. record of events, conditions, opinions, diagnoses
  2. kept in the regular course of business
  3. made at or near the time of the matter described
  4. made by a person with knowledge
  5. is the regular practice of the business AND
  6. the opponent party does not show a lack of trustworthiness
61
Q

Hearsay exceptions: Statements made for medical diagnosis/treatment. Not excluded by the hearsay rule when the statement (2)

A
  1. is made for (and reasonably pertinent to) medical diagnosis or treatment AND 2. describes medical history or symptoms (past or presence)
62
Q

Hearsay exceptions: Statements of mental, emotional, or physical condition. Admissible when the statements of declarant’s (2)

A

a) then-existing state of mind (motive, intent, or plan) OR
b) emotional, sensory, or physical condition

63
Q

Hearsay exception: Dying declaration. Elements to be admissible

A

declarant is unavailable, statement made under a sense of impending death, and statement was about the circumstances of cause that put the declarant in the position of impending death

64
Q

Dying declarations are only allowed in what two types of cases

A

civil cases and criminal homicide

65
Q

Declarant is deemed unavailable if witness (5)

A
  1. is exempt due to privilege
  2. refuses to testify despite a court order
  3. does not remember
  4. cannot be present due to death or illness OR
  5. is beyond the reach of a court’s subpoena and cannot be procured by reasonable means
66
Q

Hearsay exception: statement against interest

A

admissible if:
1. it’s a statement against the declarant’s penal, proprietary, or pecuniary interest when made;
2. declarant has firsthand knowledge
3. a reasonable person in the declarant’s position would have made the statement only if they believed it to be true AND
4. declarant is unavailable

67
Q

Hearsay exception: public records (3)

A
  1. a record describing policies and practices of a public office
  2. observations made by someone in accordance with his duties of law (but excludes police reports in criminal case) OR
  3. factual findings from a legally authorized investigation (but only in civil cases or against the gov in a criminal case)
68
Q

Public records will NOT be admitted if the opponent party shows a lack of _______

A

trustworthiness

69
Q

Hearsay Exceptions: Past Recollection recorded

A

A record made on a matter the witness once knew about and now cannot recall well enough to testify fully and accurately

70
Q

Past recollection recorded is admissible if (5)

A
  1. witness had personal knowledge at the time
  2. writing was made or adopted by the witness
  3. it was made while the event was still fresh in the witness’s mind
  4. is accurate
  5. AND witness can no longer remember the event
71
Q

A past recollection recorded may be read into evidence BUT it can only be received as an exhibit if

A

offered by an adverse party

72
Q

The 6th A confrontation clause gives a criminal D the right to

A

confront witnesses against him

73
Q

The use of an out-of-court statement, even if within a hearsay exception, violates the 6th A when:

A
  1. the statement is testimonial
  2. declarant is unavailable to be cross-examined at trial and
  3. D did not have an opportunity to cross declarant before trial
74
Q

Testimonial = statements made to: (3)

A
  1. grand juries
  2. affidavit or certified report with forensic lab results
  3. the police whose primary purpose was to collect testimony to be used at a later trial
75
Q

T/F A statement to assist police in an ongoing emergency is not testimonial

A

true

76
Q

Spousal immunity

A

a witness-spouse in a valid marriage may refuse to testify against their spouse in a criminal case

77
Q

Spousal immunity…..apply in civil cases

A

does not

78
Q

Spousal immunity ends

A

after divorce

79
Q

Confidential marriage communications

A

Communications between spouses are privileged if made during the course of a valid marriage and were intended to be confidential

80
Q

Confidential marital communications privilege applies in which type of cases

A

criminal and civil

81
Q

Spousal privileges DO NOT apply (2)

A
  1. in cases between the spouses or
  2. when a spouse commits a crime against the other spouse or their children
82
Q

Attorney client privilege protects confidential communications between the attorney and client if (2)

A

intended to be confidential and made to facilitate legal services

83
Q

Attorney-client privilege DOES NOT apply when (3)

A
  1. legal services are sought to further a crime or fraud
  2. a litigation is related to a breach of duty between the attorney and client OR
  3. joint clients are later involved in civil litigation against each other
84
Q

Attorney work product doctrine

A

protects from disclosure all materials prepared by an attorney (or his agents) in anticipation of or during litigation

85
Q

Exception to attorney work product doctrine

A

if a party shows a substantial need exists and a substantial equivalent cannot be obtained without undue hardhsip

86
Q

Physician-patient privilege

A

Most states recognize the privilege if its a confidential patient communication, made to a physician, for the purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment

87
Q

The patient holds the physician-patient privilege, but it may be waived when

A

a medical condition is placed at issue (i.e. personal injury lawsuit)

88
Q

Do federal courts recognize the physician-patient privilege?

A

No

89
Q

State law governs privilege for _____ cases in federal court on a claim/defense when state law supplies the rule of decision (i.e. a ______ action)

A

state; diversity

90
Q

Psychotherapist-patient privilege

A

all states recognize this privilege, which protects:
1. confidential patient communications
2. made to a psychotherapist
3. for the purpose of psychological treatment

91
Q

Exceptions to psychotherapist privilege (4)

A
  1. court-ordered examinations
  2. civil commitment proceedings to determine if hospitalization is required
  3. when the condition is placed in issue by the patient
  4. the dangerous patient exception–the therapist has a duty to warn when he knows or should know that the patient poses a serious threat of violence to foreseeable victims
92
Q

Statements in a publication (eg a learned treatise) may be read into evidence if they are 1) called to the attention of, or relied upon, by an expert witness during examination and 2) the publication is established as a reliable authority by any other party’s expert or by judicial notice. However, the publication itself may not be

A

offered as an exhibit

93
Q

Interrogatories may only be served on

A

nonparties

94
Q

All attorney-expert communications are privileged unless they

A
  1. relate to the expert’s compensation or 2. identify facts, date, or assumptions provided by the attorney that the expert considered or relied on in forming his/her opinions

Bar Exam (10 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions