evidence Flashcards

(32 cards)

1
Q

Criminal Burdens of Proof for Prosecution & Defendant

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How to think about “burden of proof” conceptually

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Denial v. affirmative defense

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How to shift burden of proof

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Types of facts judicially noticed

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Must jury accept noticed fact as true (civil & criminal)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Character evidence for substantive use flowchart

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Character evidence admissibility flowchart

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Rules relating to content of writings, recordings, and photographs

A
  1. Best evidence rule
  2. admissibility of other evidence of content (original not required when CLOTS applies–collateral issue, lost, opponent possession / refused delivery, testimony/admission by opponent, subpoena cannot obtain original)
  3. Summaries of voluminous writings, recordings, photos
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Requirements for opinion testimony by lay witnesses

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Proper scope of lay, non-expert opinion (i.e., actual topics)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Are legal conclusions by lay witnesses admissible?

A

NO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Bases of opinion testimony by experts

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Expert opinions on ultimate issue

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

attorney client privilege

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Declarant unavailable hearsay exceptions

A

I Don’t Have The Witness:

Interest, against
Dying Declaration
History, personal/family
Former testimony
Wrongdoing/forfeiture (made unavail)

17
Q

Hearsay exceptions, availability immaterial

A

My Big TRICEPS

Medical diagnosis/treatment
Business records

Treatise
Recollection recorded
Impression, present sense (present sense Impression)
Conviction
Excited utterance
Public records
State of mind

18
Q

Items for which extrinsic evidence of authenticity is not required

19
Q

Authentication principle (evidence) (what is authentication in relation to admissibility)

A

condition precedent to admissibility

20
Q

What does authentication require (i.e., what’s the standard)

A

sufficient evidence to support finding that matter in question is what its proponent claims it to be

21
Q

“sufficient evidence” for authentication purposes

A

that which a reasonable person could find “genuine” by a preponderance of the evidence

22
Q

who determines admissibility / weight

A

admissibility: judge
weight: jury

23
Q

What evidence needs to be authenticated

A

generally, only tangible evidence

24
Q

What kind of witness is required for extrinsic authentication

A

sponsoring witness

25
Direct physical evidence authentication method
someone with personal knowledge of, or familiarity with the item, or a “custodian of records” testifies to authenticate
26
Circumstantial physical evidence authentication methods
may be authenticated by chain of custody, ancient documents rule, or other distinctive characteristics
27
Rule of completeness
- one party introduces part of writing/recording/oral statements - adverse party may immediately introduce any other part which, in fairness, out to be considered in conjunction
28
general competency rule, evidence Implications for age, for example
generally, everyone is competent to testify (no age limit, goes to weight for jury to determine)
29
personal knowledge requirements for lay and expert witnesses
lay witness: must have personal knowledge expert witness: need not
30
competency of judge as witness
The presiding judge may not testify in a trial (the objection is automatic and need not be made)
31
competency of juror as witness
32
Impeachment by prior crime flow chart