Evidence Essentials Flashcards

(12 cards)

1
Q

Oral evidence -
Real Evidence -
Documentary evidence -

A
  • evidence given by witnesses orally in court
  • an item or thing
  • documents lodged to the court
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Facta probanda
Facta probationis

A

Facts to be proven
Facts of the proof/circumstantial evidence, multiple pieces satisfy the facta probanda

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Circumstantial evidence

A

Evidence that relies on other pieces of evidence to confirm facts of the case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Burdens of proof
Persuasive-

A

beyond reasonable doubt, lies on prosecution, defence only has this for some defences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Burdens of proof
Evidential -

A

Requires a party to identify sufficient evidence for a court to justify a legal issue as a live one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Burdens of proof
Incidental burden

A

Where parties leading persuasive argument have a full case, incidental burden arises on the other party to disprove this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

No case to answer?

A

Where prosecutions case is too weak, judge will acquit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Moorov v HM advocate 1930

A

Moorov doctrine of corroboration
Where conduct of accused is similar in time character and circumstance, from multiple individuals, evidence can be considered corroborated
Moorov had been accused of sexually assaulting female employees when they were alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Lord advocates Reference (no 1 of 2023)

A

Corroborating statements acting as supporting evidence
Court determined that in this case, complainers distress at the time and statements given shortly after rape constituted corroboration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hm Advocate v PG and JM 2024

A

Corroboration of perpetrators identification
Statements from soon after the events could not corroborate id of perpetrator
Babysitter accused of touching boys in 1990
Charges unsubstantiated, insufficient corroboration of id

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Witnesses are competent when

A

Until proved otherwise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Gubinas v HM advocate

A

Jury can make up its own mind about video evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly