Evidence for population health I & II Flashcards
(27 cards)
What are descriptive studies and what is their purpose?
Those that describe cases or a population. The purpose is to know how much disease a region or group has.
What are the various ways in which descriptive/observational studies may be conducted?
- Anecdote/case series
- Cross-sectional survey
- Measuring incidence
- Ecological studies
- Case-control study
- Cohort study
What are the pros of an anecdote/case series?
- Quick
- Easy to perform in a clinic
- Provides new previously unobserved conditions
- Provides new potential risk factors
What are the cons of an anecdote/case series?
- Not scientific - not able to test a hypothesis
- Seriously affected by observer bias
- Difficult to make inference about disease cause
What is a cross-sectional survey?
Count number of people with disease in short time period (hence cross-sectional) in a pre-defined population.
What are the pros of cross-sectional surveys?
- Quick
- Good at estimating prevalence or burden
What are the cons of cross-sectional surveys?
- Only represents that point in time.
- Cannot estimate incidence
- Sampling frame may lead to bias (e.g. missing workers)
What does measuring incidence involve?
Recording new cases in a pre-specified population. Cases are registered via GP systems, death certificates, newspaper adverts etc…
What is the counterfactual method?
Would the disease have happened at the same time in the same person if the factor of interest was not present?
What are ‘ecological’ studies?
Studies where the unit of observation is a group for at least one variable.
What are the pros of ecological studies?
- Less expensive
- Less prone to bias due to participation
- Easy to perform using routinely collected data
- Provides new hypotheses about the causes of a disease or condition
- Provides new potential risk factors
What are the cons of ecological studies?
- Ecological fallacy - do population level measures hold for the individual?
- Assume average value of the risk factor applies to all individuals
- Assume average incidence applies to all the individuals in a population
- Data collection may vary e.g. coding systems
What is a case-control study?
Compare two populations (exposed and non exposed) and look for differences in disease incidence.
What are the pros of a case-control study?
- Good for rare disease and/or rare exposure.
- Fairly quick (no need for follow up)
What are the cons of a case-control study?
- Prone to selection bias
- Especially prone to participation bias
- Finding a suitable control group can be difficult
- Difference in recall, leading to bias
What is a cohort study?
Follow two cohorts (exposed and non-exposed) over a period of time and observe outcome. Exposed cohort must be at risk of but free from outcome at the start.
What are the pros of a cohort study?
- Good for rare exposures
- Can look at multiple outcomes
- Reduces information bias, survivor bias
- Direct measurement of incidence
What are the cons of cohort studies?
- Inefficient for rare diseases
- Expensive
- Retrospective is much quicker
- Loss to follow-up
What is the counterfactual theory of causation?
The basic idea of counterfactual theories of causation is that the meaning of causal claims can be explained in terms of counterfactual conditionals of the form “If A had not occurred, C would not have occurred”
What is a randomised controlled trial?
Randomise study population into treatment group and control group.
What is the difference between a preventive RCT and a therapeutic RCT?
Use currently healthy people for preventive trial, currently sick people for therapeutic trial.
What are the important features of an RCT?
Randomisation - to eliminate bias
Blinding - patient cannot be influenced by self, or clinician
Placebo-controlled - compare the drug you are testing against a placebo
What are the pros of RCTs?
- Strongest evidence for causality
- If randomised, selection bias and confounding removed
- If blinded, less observer bias
What are the cons of RCTs?
- Not real life
- High cost
- Inappropriate/unethical for many research questions