Evil And Suffering Flashcards

1
Q

Evil

A
  • The absence of good
  • An abstract concept
  • Natural evil vs moral evil
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Suffering

A
  • Can be caused by evil
  • Pain or harm to an individual no matter species
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The concept of God

A

An omnipotent, omnibenevolent, omniscient and transcendent being of God of classic theism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Theism

A

The belief in God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Moral evil

A

Evil caused by human agency (e.g., murder, rape)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Natural evil

A

Evil caused naturally (e.g., Tsunamis, droughts)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The evidential problem of evil

A
  • There are known facts about evil that are evidence against the existence of God.
  • The evidential problem of God is made worse by God’s omniscience.
    There are two types of evil which supply such evidence:
    1. Evil that is overwhelming in quantity and quality.
    2. Evil that is pointless because it serves no useful purpose
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Theodicy

A

The word theodicy derives from Greek words, theos and dike. It translates to justifying God or a defence of God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Augustinian theodicy

A

God exists and evil exists. Both are necessary. God is right to allow evil and suffering as they play an important part in our nature and development as humans.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Quote on creation

A

“God saw all that he had made and it was good.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Quote on the fall

A

“For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Key criticisms

A

Moral: How can an all-loving God allow suffering to occur. It isn’t fair.
Logical: Schleiermacher- it is a logical contradiction to say that a perfect world (Genesis 1) could go wrong.
Scientific: Genesis creation story is challenged by evolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Apologist

A

A person who offers an argument in defence if something controversial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Summary of Irenaean theodicy

A

Irenaeus offers a different theory to St Augustine. In Against Heresies, he claimed that God deliberately created an imperfect world so that humans could, through trial and adversity, develop into perfect beings. In a sense, evil and suffering are part of God’s plan for humanity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Free will

A

The idea that God has given us the opportunity to make our own choices in order to give us independence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Soul-making

A

Suffering ultimately makes people develop into better beings.

17
Q

Irenaeus theodicy as a upwards theodicy

A

It offers the opportunity for humanity to improve themselves and work up to perfection.

18
Q

Irenaeus theodicy as a soul-making theodicy

A

Humanity is on a learning curve, striving towards perfection. Suffering has the benefit of creating an environment where desireable characteristics can be developed by mankind.

19
Q

Quote on Irenaeus theodicy

A

“A world without problems, difficulties, perils, and hardships would be morally static, for moral and spiritual growth comes through responses to challenges; and in paradise there would be no challanges.”

20
Q

Similarities between Irenaean theodicy and Augustine theodicy

A

Both credit free will

21
Q

Differences between Irenaean theodicy and Augustine theodicy

A

Augustine blames suffering on humanity, whereas Irenaeus “blames” God.

22
Q

Why is evil a problem?

A
  • Only a problem for theists.
  • Conflict between the ‘omni’ qualities of God and the existence of evil that lead to suffering
  • Theodicy = justifying God
23
Q

Purpose on John Hick’s justification

A

To show that there is a plausible explanation for the existence of evil that is probably true.

24
Q

John Hick: 1. Augustine theodicy is no longer credible

A

-Hick finds this ‘utterly acceptable’ that Augustine places the origin of evil and suffering in the fall of Adam and Eve.
-Scientifically Genesis is a mythological account, disease was a part of the world as well as natural disasters before humans which contradicts Augustine’s belief that these things were brought to punish Adam and Eve.

25
Q

John Hick: 2. Children of God

A

-Humans did not fall from creation but were created as imperfect human beings with the potential to become ‘children of God’
-God is constantly described as a father figure of humans
-No human father can force his children to love him; children learn to love their parents through a response to their parent’s care, this is the same as God.

26
Q

John Hick: 3. A ‘two-step process’ of creation and development

A

-Hick extends the ‘two-step’ process of how humans create and develop their children to God’s creation and development of the human race.
-“Let us make mankind in our own image.”
-Human parents create their children biologically then nurture their development
-We are capable relationship with God, eventually humans can become more Christ-like
-“The fulfilment of God’s purpose for humanity, the bringing of many sons to glory, the creating the children of God.

27
Q

John Hick: 4. Everyone becomes a ‘child of God’

A

-Some children never learn to response to their parents.
-Eventually all of the human race will respond freely to God, be saved and go to heaven.

28
Q

John Hick: 5. The world is a place of soul-making

A

-For Hick is the world is a place of soul-making
-For Hick, the idea of hell is unthinkable for a God of love
-God’s salvation is for all humanity

29
Q

John Hick: 6. Epistemic distance from God

A

-If humans knew God existed, then freedom would be lost because they would just do whatever God wanted them to do.
- The world is full of natural and moral evils so humans can develop and become good.
-Hick agrees with the free-will defence
The counterfactual hypothesis: the benefits of this world, with all its challenges are in contrast to the experience if living in a world without any incentives to do anything. Life currently gives us stimulus for development.

30
Q

John Hick: 7. We must be free to choose the Good.

A

Hick rejects Mackie’s argument that God could have created us so people always freely choose good.