Evolution Across the Human Life Course Flashcards
(53 cards)
Life history
- predicts how natural selection shapes an organism’s ability to convert energy into making babies
- energy trade-off between somatic maintenance, growth and reproduction
Extrinsic mortality
- high EM = more energy into reproduction
- earlier age at weaning, earlier age at sexual maturation, shorter pregnancies, small litters and small offspring
Primate slow life history
grade shift to another life history course with longer lifespan and reduced fertility
why?
- brain size?
- slow growth? beneficial if resources are low
- unpredictable juvenile survival?
- unpredictable environment? if have longer lifespan, can wait till better conditions to reproduce
Human life history
- slightly longer gestation though within variation across great apes
- significantly larger babies
- significantly larger newborn brain size
Human - slow life history traits
- long gestation
- large babies
- reduced mortality rates so don’t need to rush fertility
- long lifespan
- long period of parental investment
Human - fast life history traits
- earlier weaning = allows birthstacking and helping at the nest
- shorter interbirth intervals = increased fertility
- high fertility = increased incidence of twins and greater interest in sexual behaviours (long-term partnerships)
grade-shift in primates and then again in great apes to reduce offspring but humans are in the primate range
Variation in human life history courses
- more deprived neighbourhoods = mothers younger at 1st birth, reduced birthweights, earlier weaning and grandmothering less likely
- switch to fast life history course due to increased extrinsic mortality
- reduced paternal investment as seeks other partners to increase reproductive success
- reduced parental investment negatively impacts child development e.g. literacy tests
Primate brain size
- large variation
- grade shift from primates to great apes
- most variation is allometric = due to variation in body size
- larger brain size represents a functional difference
- EC = observed/predicted brain size
- EC>1 = encephalised, human EC ~7.5
- not all brains of the same size are the same e.g. different proportions of neocortex
Theories of primate brain size
- social brain hypothesis
- visual specialisation hypothesis
- social innovation hypothesis
Social brain hypothesis of primate brain size
- cognitive demands of living in complex social groups selects for increased neocortex
- doesn’t deny existence of ecological issues but suggests that these are solved socially
- social interactions determine foraging patterns
- predation solved in groups
- neocortex limits number of relationships that can be formed = determines group size
Visual specialisation hypothesis of primate brain size
- transition to eating fruit
- visual areas larger in frugivorous species
- larger visual areas for processes such as colour acuity and fine detail
- allows perception of fruit
Social innovation hypothesis of human brain size
- brain size and intelligence linked
- behavioural innovation, social learning and tool use correlate with relative size of the neocortex
Why are Hominins further encephalised?
same selection pressures as on primates but intensified?
- greater focus on cognitive-demanding foods
- food sharing requires social cognition
novel selection pressures?
- dietary niche with technology
release of constraints on brain size?
- shift to food which is difficult to acquire but energy-rich
- cooking and expensive tissue hypothesis
Expensive tissue hypothesis
gut versus brain energy trade off
high quality diet = faster meat digestion = shorter gut = quicker energy assimilation = increased brain size
AND higher quality diet = more complex feeding strategy = increased brain size
- meat made us human hypothesis
- evidence of cooking (flint tools, bones and controlled fire use)
ETH - cats
- gut increased in length to consume starchy foods from humans
- altered microbiota alters neuronal connectivity in the brain
- reduced energy consumption of the brain
- reduced brain, increased gut
- opposite of encephalisation
Trade-offs other than the ETH
- mammals trade fat storage for brain
- maybe we have both due to efficient bipedalism
- reproductive function = high level athletes pause menstrual cycle
- reduced inflammation (bad if extreme)
- reduced sperm count
Why are humans fat?
- starvation = reduction in adipose to save other organs like brain
- surviving famine and food shortages = cycles of feast and famine
- surviving infection
- funding reproduction
- thermal insulation
- funding growth (brain)
- sexual selection
Determinants of height
- height more variable in West where environmental conditions less likely to limit
- greater stature associated with increased income, IQ, reproductive success, reduced CV disease, cancer etc
- associations do not equal causation
- associations with mate preference, life history strategy, subsistence strategy and climate?
Determinants of size
- adaptation = long term selection on size e.g body size, brain size, lifespan etc
- plasticity to environmental experience e.g. nutrition, disease load, activity and stress
Why are the Dutch so tall?
- hidden genetic variants? may have been masked by poor environmental conditions but now improved
- natural selection?
- sexual selection?
- milk consumption? Dutch drink a lot of milk which affects IGF1 levels
Gestation
- primates have longer gestation, highly altricial offspring, single litters, reduced daily energy cost of fetal growth
- human babies much larger relative to adult body size
- deep placentation required to provide nutrients for e.g. larger brain
Energy costs of gestation
late gestation, BMR is constrained
capital gains:
- increased tissue mass
- fetus and associated tissues
- maternal tissue hyperplasia
- maternal fat gain
running costs
- increased BMR
- increased cost of activity due to increased body mass
Obstetric dilemma
- obstructed labour is major cause of maternal mortality
- bipedalism selects for narrow pelvis as increased hip width = increased cost of locomotion
- costs of locomotion similar between sexes, suggests selection has been successful
- increased pelvic width = increased pelvic floor disorders (could be fatal in past and low income countries)
- inflexible pubic symphyses as flexibility would increase PFDs further (only flexible in small mammals with reduced PFDs)
- large brain and small birth canal = tight fetopelvic fit
- secondary altriciality as solution to the dilemma = head size determines timing of parturition
Disputes of the obstetric dilemma
- some debate about whether bipedalism actually selects for a narrow pelvis
- timing of parturition due to overwhelming maternal BMR (energetics of gestation and growth) not fetal head size