Evolutionism and Historical Particularism Flashcards
(27 cards)
Development of anthropology
- “Proto-Anthropology”: Missionaries who described the people they encountered in their journals
-Austro-German: historical diffusion of cultural traits, primarly objects (till WW II); seperated from Volkskunde/Europäische Ethnologie which concerns the inventorastion of the various European cultures
-French (from early 20th C onwards): Durkheim, Mauss, van Gennep, Lévy-Bruhl, Lévi-Strauss, Foucault, Bourdieu - sociology and philosophy
Development of anthropology UK vs. US
UK: imperialism, foreign colinization, indirect rule: political organization, social structures
US: occupation of ‘Wild West’, internal colonialzation, separation in reservations, difference in culture: language, material culture
The three main approaches in anthropology
-social anthropology
-cultural anthropology
-physical anthropology
two important orientations in early history of anthropology (1880s)
evolutionism
historical particularism
Charles Darwin
All species have descended from common ancestors. best adjusted spiece - survives and reproduces which explains how traits can change over time.
evolutionism
cultures and societies evolve from simple to complex that is: from ‘primitive’ to ‘highly developed’; ‘low’ to ‘high’; ‘uncivilized’ to ‘civilized’
difference between evolution and evolutionism
evolution is the process by which organisms change and develop new traits over succeeding generations, while evoultionsm refers to the theories that try to explain the process of evolution
People that believed in evolutionism
Lewis Henry Morgan and Edward B. Tylor
consequenses of evolutionism
1) Scientific thinking into races - skin color, cranial sizes, etc leading to
2) the idea of racial phenotypes, and eugenetics claiming that race is a biological thing
3) (legacy of) Racism
positive and negative factors of evolutionism
+every society has the possibility to develop/evolve
+focus on change, transformation, development
-history is not one-way, not teleological
-(almost always) ethnocentric
criticasters of evolutionism in history
Franz Boas, critized scientific racism: races as sharply delineated entites do not exist - decoupling ‘race’, culture, language
historical particularism
Franz Boas (founding figure of American anthropology). Each culture needs to be understood as the (temporary) result of its own, specific historical context and development. first theory with cultural relativism as core.
three traits to explain cultural customs (historical particularism)
- environmental conditions
- psychological factors
- historical connections, history being most important, hence the name
positive factors historical particularism
+strong emphasis on systematic collecting of empirical material and detailed description
+holistic
+anti-ethnocenrism, both morally and methodologically
negative factors historical particularism
- despite attention to transformation, focus on cultures as autonomous, isolated entities
- (too) much emphasis/focus on uniqueness at the expense of the general: comparison to no avail. increase of ‘facts’/data, and too little synthesis (archival tendency)
Ruth Benedict
historical particularism, “a culture, like an individual, is a more or less consistent pattern of thought and action”. her comparative analysis of japanese vs. american, shame vs. guilt.
Why do we need theories?
-systematic thinking
-framework of concepts, perhaps not theory
-principles and procedures to analyse, interpret, and understand phenomena
physical anthropology
Concerned with origin, evolution and diversity of people. Inspired by evolutionary biology
Social anthropology
Study of systems of social relations via economics, law, politics, social and domestic life. Organizational aspects
Cultural anthropology
Sees cultural phenomena as holistic. How culture affects individuals (for instance rituals). Rounded view of knowledge, customs and institutions of a people
Lewis Henry Morgan and evolutionism
Believed that matriarchy was the basis of social life by looking at native americans’ social org. Claimed that social structure combined with material culture (access to which resources) affected culture amongst Native Americans.Claimed that people can be placed on an evolutionary ladder and, if (use of) material environment changes their conditions, they can rise on the ladder.
Evolutionary ladder
Articulated by Edward Tylor and Lewis Henry Morgan - suggests that humans can be ranked according to three stages. 1) Savagery 2) Barbarism 3) Civilization.
Edward B Tylor and evolutionism
Focused on comparative ethnography. Did also use the evolutionary ladder framework, yet compared socieites to see their differences. Linked society to religion, and did not rank religions differently, just evolving from different environments. Coined the term animism.
Overview of evolutionism
1) Grounded on a shared consensus that all people derive from a common ancestor
2) yet all cultures show developmental differences
3) Caucasian have been reaching a higher cognitive and moral level than other “races” - their culture is thus the apex of civilization
4) Thus legitimizing colonialism as a European mission to civilize other “races” (white man’s burden)