EX 317 Ch 1

Question 1

Analysis

Answer 1

The processing and understanding of patterns in a child’s educational, social, developmental, environmental, medical, and emotional history.

Question 2

Assessment Approach

Answer 2

The way information is collected for making an educational decision.

Question 3

Assessment

Answer 3

A process that involves collecting information about a student for the purpose of making decisions.

Question 4

Autism

Answer 4

A developmental disability significantly affecting verbal and nonverbal communication and social interaction, generally evident before age 3.

Question 5

Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson School District v. Rowley

Answer 5

The obligation to provide an appropriate education does not mean a school must provide the best education or one designed to maximize a student’s potential.

Question 6

Brown v. Board of Education Topeka, KS.

Answer 6

it was illegal under the 14th amendment to arbitrarily discriminate against any group of people.

Question 7

Collection

Answer 7

Process of tracing and gathering information from background information on a child (School records, observation, parents intakes, teacher reports)

Question 8

Consent for evaluation

Answer 8

A means of ensuring that parents have both full knowledge of school actions and involvement in the decision-making process.

Question 9

Daniel R.R. v. State BOE

Answer 9

opened the door to increased inclusion of children with disabilities in regular education classes

Question 10

Determination

Answer 10

the determination of the presence of a suspected disability using knowledge of the criteria that constitute each category.

Question 11

Developmental delay

Answer 11

Experiencing delay in one or more of the following areas: physical, cognitive, communication

Question 12

Diana v. BOE

Answer 12

California was mandated by the court to correct bias in assessment procedures used with Chinese american and Mexican american students.

Question 13

Due Process

Answer 13

the right to an impartial hearing if parents do not agree with the decisions made about their child during the assessment process.

Question 14

Education of All Handicapped Children Act (EHA)

Answer 14

federal law procedural safeguards for children with disabilities and their parents.

Question 15

Education of the Handicapped Act Amendments (1886)

Answer 15

Amended P.L. 94-142, requiring states to provide a free and appropriate public education to children with disabilities ages 3 through 5.

Question 16

Eligibility and diagnosis

Answer 16

determination by assessment whether a child is eligible for special education services and what classification the child will receive.

Question 17

Emotional Disturbance

Answer 17

a disability where the child of typical intellegence has difficulty, over time and to a marked degree, with various emotional and behavioral issues.

Question 18

Georgia State Conference of the Branches of NAACP v. State of Georgia

Answer 18

ruled that overrepresentation of African American children in classes for the mentally retarded by itself was not sufficient to prove discrimination.

Question 19

Gerstmeyer v. Howard county Public Schools

Answer 19

when a a school district delays an evaluation for 6 months, parents can sue for the costs associated with the delay and be reimbursed for all associated costs.

Question 20

Guadalupe v. Tempe Elementary

Answer 20

children could not be placed in educable mentally retarded classes unless they scored lower than two standard deviations below population mean on IQ test

Question 21

Hobson v. Hansen

Answer 21

the D.C. school system’s tracking system was invalid

Question 22

IDEA ‘97

Answer 22

strengthened parents’ roles and the LRE mandate

Question 23

IDEA 2004

Answer 23

most recent IDEA

Question 24

Informed consent

Answer 24

rights of the parents to know exactly what will happen to their children in the process of assessment

Question 25

Jose v Ambach

Answer 25

evaluation in or for Special education services must be timely

Question 26

Larry P. v. Riles

Answer 26

using IQ test for african americans was Discrimitory

Question 27

Luke S. and Han S. v. Nix et al

Answer 27

ruled that greater referral assessment should be done before a referral is made.

Question 28

Mental retardation

Answer 28

significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning existing concurrently with deficits in adaptive behavior.

Question 29

Mills. V. Board of Education of District of Columbia

Answer 29

rights of students to have access to a free public education, due process protection, and a mandated requirement to recieve special education services regardless of the school district’s financial capability.

Question 30

PARC v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Answer 30

ratified a consent agreement ensuring that schools may not exclude students who have been classified with mental retardation

Question 31

PASE v. Joseph P. Hannon

Answer 31

found that the use of intelligence tests were acceptable in psychoeducational assessment as long as schools followed other procedural safeguards under federal law.

Question 32

Section 504 of the Vocational Rehabilitation Act

Answer 32

created to prevent discrimination against all individuals with disabilities in programs that receive federal funds, as do all public schools.

Question 33

Vocational Education Act of 1984 (perkins act)

Answer 33

Law authorizing federal funds to support vocational education programs.

Question 34

Wyatt v. Stickney

Answer 34

ruled that mentally retarded children in state institutions had a constitutional right to treatment.

Question 35

Americans with Disabilities Act

Answer 35

Federal Anti-discrimination legislation for people with disabilties enacted in 1990.