Exam 1 Flashcards
(61 cards)
moral situation
has a choice, one or more objects of moral concern, and a moral agent
normative judgment
is one that states some value or evaluative rule as a standard of other judgments, or applies such a value or rule to specific cases
descriptive judgment
makes an assertion that is offered as a statement of the facts that pertain to reality
judgments of moral value (aretaic)
judgments that apply a moral status to certain character traits or the character of individuals
judgments of obligation (deontic)
a judgment that applies a moral status to a certain action or set of actions
act of commission
is a positive form of behaviors; a doing of something
act of omission
is a failure to do something
voluntary action
is one performed by an agent who (a) understand what he/she is doing and (b) willingly performs the action
involuntary action
is one where the agent doesn’t understand what he/she is doing and does not willingly perform the action
right action
is an action that we ought (in a moral sense) to perform
wrong action
is one that we ought not (in a moral sense) to perform
permissible action
an action that is consistent with our moral obligations
elective action
an action that is either required nor proscribed on moral grounds
obligatory action (right action)
an action that is required on moral grounds
supererogatory action
an action that is praiseworthy on moral grounds, but not morally obligatory
impermissible action
an action that is inconsistent with our moral obligations
duty
a person has a moral duty to perform an action if he or she has an obligation to perform that action
right
a person has a moral right to be treated in a certain way if all other moral agents have an obligation to treat him or her in that way
Reflective Equilibrium
Ethical Principles, Moral Intuitions, Factual Beliefs
Principle of Universalizability
if one judges that an action has a certain moral status then one is committed to the judgment that any other action in all relevant respects has the same moral status.
Corollary 1 on Universalizability
Moral intuitions must ultimately be expressible in the form of general moral principles
Corollary 2 of Universalizability
Moral Principles must specify in some fashion what facts are relevant to moral judgment in particular moral situations
Corollary 3 of Universalizability
when considering different moral situations that raise the same moral issue (1) the relevant facts of two situations are significantly different, as defined by a principle, and yet our moral intuitions are the same, or (2) if the relevant facts are the same but our moral intuitions differ, then we must conclude that either our principle or our intuitions are wrong (example of this is the trolly scenario)
The Naturalistic Fallacy
offering natural facts as the sufficient grounds for supporting an ethical person