Exam 1 Flashcards

(47 cards)

1
Q

Q3: Are studies that would answer my clinical question likely to be included?

A

Review the inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Are the types of interventions investigated relevant to my clinical question and clinical practice?

A

Assess if the included interventions are
- Relevant to the clinical question
- Relevant to the clinical practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Are the outcome measures relevant to my clinical question

A
  • Methods section: outcome measures eligible to be included
  • Outcome measures assessed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Is the study population (sample population) sufficiently similar to my patient to justify the expectation that my patient would respond similarly to the population?

A
  • Summary of the demographics of the participants
  • Close enough is fine
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A systematic review should provide

A

a detailed list of the terms and search strategies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Was a comprehensive number of appropriate databases used?

A
  • Attempt to find all of the available literature on a topic
  • usually 3-7
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Language bias results when

A

Important study results are excluded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Unpublished data can be obtained by?

A

Personally contacting the researcher who conducted the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How recent was the Search

A

Time passed between the search window and the time that you are reviewing it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What search are likely to have a reduced risk for bias?

A

RCTs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Broader searches can provide?

A

a more expansive perspective on current evidence for that topic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Quality of the studies in the systematic review

A

Risk of Bias tool
- To Evaluate & judge

2 or more independent reviewers used a standardized study appraisal tool, if needed, a third review is consulted to resolve the discrepancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Meta-analysis is useful because

A

it allows data from several studies to be combined to give a more precise estimate of the difference between two interventions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

To produce valid results, combined studies must be similar in 3 aspects

A
  • Study population (Patient characteristics)
  • Intervention
  • Outcome measures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Assessment of clinical heterogeneity involves the authors to conduct an analysis of which variables

A
  • Study Population
  • Intervention
  • Outcome measures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When a meta-analysis is conducted

A

should be paired with a test of statistical heterogeneity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Name of statistical heterogeneity

A

Between-study variance
Cochran’s Q
Index of variability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

If a meta-analysis was not conducted

A

should provide a narrative synthesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

If the outcome of interest is dichotomous

A

relative risk and odds ratio can be used

20
Q

Relative Risk

A
  • Greater than 1: increased risk
  • Less than 1: decreased risk
  • 1: identical risks
21
Q

Odds Ratio

A
  • 1: odds of exposure are similar
  • Greater than 1: Increased likehood of exposure (positive association)
  • Less than 1: Decreased likehood of exposure (negative association)
22
Q

Outcome of interest is continuous (range of motion, strength)

A

mean difference or effect size between treatment and control groups is most commonly reported

23
Q

If a meta-analysis is included

24
Q

Cohort studies

A
  • a group of participants
  • likely to develop
  • followed into the future (prospectively)
25
Retrospective for Cohort studies
Previous history/ record
26
Case control studies
- Conducted after an outcome of interest has occurred - Case group vs. controlled group
27
A sample that sufficiently represents the study event must
be identified at a common point in the progression of the patients' condition
28
If the number of factors increase
The sample size of a study must also increase
28
In a longitudinal cohort study
the sample participants must not already have the study outcome
28
Time points should have relevance to?
The conditions and course of care
29
ICC
continuous
30
Spearman's rho
ordinal
31
Kappa
Nominal
32
The objectivity is best obtained if
the measurers do not know the study purpose or the group status of the particpants
33
The greater the percentage of participants who have completed the study
the better
34
Linear correlation
- Direction of trend - Quality of straight line fit
35
Regression
Prediction The close the value to 1, the more robust the prediction
36
Linear Regression
- One variable is used to predict the level of another variable - Assuming that the two variables have a linear relationship - Outcome of interest must be continuous
37
Multiple regression
Predictions with multiple contributing variables Outcome of interest is continuous
38
Logistic regression
- outcome of interest is assessed with a categorical variable - one vs. another
39
Risk ratio typically used with
cohort design study
40
Odds ratio typically used with
case control studies
41
What are the two most common study appraisal tools in PT-related systematic reviews?
- Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale - Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Controlled Trials
42
What is the most challenging elements of conducting a systematic review?
Determining if the data from multiple studies can be combined in a meta-analysis
43
What is "vote-counting"
The authors count the number of studies favoring one intervention compared to the number of studies favoring an alternative intervention
44
Forest plot
used to illustrate individual studies and pooled results from the meta-analysis
45