Exam 1 Flashcards
(57 cards)
Alloport’s definition of personality
something real in individual leading to characteristic thoughts and behaviors
Rogers definition of personality
organized, consistent pattern of “I”/ “me” at base of experiences
Skinner definition of personality
term “personality” is unnecessary
Freud definition of personality
personality is unconscious, unknown
7 theoretical approaches
1: psychoanalytic (unconscious)
2: trait (continuum of behaviors)
3: biological (genetic predispositions, physio process)
4: Behavioral/social learning (conditioning & expectations)
5. cognitive (thinking)
6. humanistic (personal responsibility & self-acceptance)
7. zen/mindfulness (awareness, mindfulness)
philosophical assumptions
explore what does it mean to be a person & the theory around it
scientists
-develop a workable set of hypotheses
-focus on data
-goal: to understand human behavior
artists
-apply what is known about people/behavior
-to foster a better life
basic philosophical assumptions
- freedom vs determinism
- heredity vs environmental
- uniqueness vs universality
- proactive vs reactive
- optimistic vs pessimistic
some basic scientific statements
empirically-driven, test hypothesis, test-able
artistic applications
assessment- psychometric tests, projective tests
research- clinical approach, psychometric approach, experimental approach
-psychotherapy
4 criteria for evaluating philosophical statements
coherence- is it clear, logical
relevance- does it fit w/ and affect our view of reality
comprehensiveness- depth and scope
compellingness- are you convinced?
5 criteria scientific statements
verifiability- capable of being confirmed/refuted, open to falsification
compatibility- does theory’s info fit w/ & build on prior infor?
predictive power
simplicity- accounts for behavior
usefulness- can we test the theory? does the theory help us in daily lives?
evaluating artistic applications
goals:
scholarly: self-understanding (ex Freud)
ethical: change, grow, improve (ex. Roger’s work)
curative: most common association w therapy, symptom remissing (ex. Skinner, Ellis, Beck)
John Watson
-pointed out that it is almost impossible to observe mental processes directly
B.F Skinner
-took behaviorist position to its logical extreme
- because of Skinner’s influence, students of psychology rapidly discovered that they were engaged not in the study of the person, but in the study of behavior
macro theories of personality
seek to be global & which emphasize comprehension of the whole person
micro theories of personality
resulted from specific research focused on limited aspects of human behavior
freedom vs determinism
some theorists believe that individuals basically have control over their behaviors & motives behind them
others believe that human behavior is basically determined by internal or external forces over which individuals have no control
heredity vs environment
theorists differ over whether inherited & inborn characteristics or factors in the environment have the more important influence on human behavior
uniqueness vs universality
some theorists believe that each individual is unique & cannot be compared w others, others contend that people are basically very similar
proactivity vs reactivity
proactive theories view human beings as acting on their initiative rather than simply reacting. The sources of behavior are perceived as lying within the individual who does more than just react to stimuli from the outside world
optimism vs pessimism
do significant changes in personality & behavior occur throughout the course of a lifetime? if an individual is motivated, can genuine changes be effected in personality: can we help others to change by restructuring their environment? some personality theories are decided more optimistic & hopeful than others concerning these possibilities
4 criteria for evaluating philosophical assumptions
- coherence: are the philosophical assumptions of a personality theory clear, logical & consistent, or are they riddled with contradictions & inconsistencies
- revelance: to be meaningful, philosophical assumption must have some bearing on our view of reality
- comprehensiveness: is the philosophical assumption “deep” enough? Does it cover what it intends to cover?
4: compellingness: Does the assumption & is underlying philosophy convince you?