Exam 1 Flashcards
(43 cards)
• What is ethics?
o Ethics refers to standards of right and wrong that prescribe what humans ought to do, usually in terms of rights, obligations, benefits to society, fairness, or specific virtues.
• Sway
o the irresistible pull of irrational behavior
• Dogma
o a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true
• Justice
o Distributing scarce goods in which it maximizes welfare, respects freedom, and in a virtuous way
• Cultural Relativism
o Ethical decisions are based upon cultural and social (and professional) norms.
o There is no objective right or wrong. Right or Wrong is determined by the culture and the time.
o Claims by Cultural Relativists
Different societies have different moral codes – there is no universal truth in ethics.
The moral code of a society determines what is right within that society.
There is no standard that can be used to judge one society’s code as better than another’s.
The moral code of our own society has no special status.
We should be tolerant of other cultures moral codes.
• Problematic Implications of Cultural Relativism
- It undermines the criticism of the practices of other societies.
- Something is moral if it abides by your society’s moral code. – Is our society perfect?
- Can a society make moral progress – can it become better at social justice?
• Ethical Egoism
o Each person ought to pursue his or her own self-interest exclusively.
o Other people matter only insofar as they can benefit me
• Psychological Egoism
o We do pursue self-interest, that’s the way things are – animalistic?
• Altruism
o The belief or practice of selfless concern for the well-being of others
Train tracks rescues
• Ayn Rand’s argument for ethical egoism
o Morality demands the ultimate respect for the rights of individuals
o Altruism denies the value of an individual (the person that helps)
• Arguments for Ethical Egoism
o Ethical Egoism is compatible with commonplace morality
o ethical egoism may explain commonplace morality (tell truth, avoid harm, etc.).
o Unifying principle of self-interest / reciprocal relationships – the Golden Rule
• Deontology
o Some things are immoral no matter what the outcome.
• Act Utilitarianism
o Always pursue the action that results in the greatest good for the greatest number
o Transplant surgeon with 5 critical patients and one ne’er-do-well, orphaned neighbor
• Rule Utilitarianism
o Live by rules that, in general, are likely to lead to the greatest good for the greatest number
o Long-term cost of harvesting organs from unsuspecting innocents
• Utilitarianism – Objections (individual rights)
Society benefit vs Individuals
Individuals matter, but only to the extent that preferences are tallied along with everyone else’s
Utilitarianism may sanction actions that violate those middle of the road norms that we discussed earlier (respect, decency)
Examples:
Throwing Christians to the Lions
Is Torture ever justified?
City of Omelas – Ursula K. La Guin
• Kant
Humans are special. We’re rational beings worthy of dignity and respect
o Morality is not about maximizing happiness (or any other end), instead it is about respecting persons as an end in themselves
• Pure Practical Reason
o Pleasure/pain certainly drive us, but we also have the capacity for reason
o We have the capacity for autonomy – choosing freely
• Freedom
acting according to a law I give myself (free will/autonomy), not according to dictates of nature or social convention (heteronomy)
• Hypothetical Imperatives
o The action is good solely as a means to something else
In order to get good grades, you have to study
o A means to an end
• Categorical Imperatives
o The act is good in itself – not merely as a means to an end.
• An imperative is an act that is required.
• Two forms of the categorical imperative
o Universal law
o Humanity as an end and not just a means
• Criticisms of Kant’s Categorical Imperative
o There are many things that satisfy Kant’s description of a categorical imperative that do not appear to rise to the level of a moral obligation.
Talking on the phone in class
o The rules regarding the categorical imperative are so absolute.
You cannot lie ever even when you are better off and everyone else is better off if you tell a lie.
o It is hard to work through in some cases. There is no guarantee that it will lead to contradiction in every case. In other words, just because you cannot force a contradiction does not mean that the act is moral or immoral.
Some issues work very well. Stealing, lying, copyright infringement.
Universalizing test
o a way of checking to see if the action puts my interests and special circumstances ahead of everyone else’s
If we lie, then we are saying that everyone else should lie. If we will everyone to lie, then we will never know who is telling the truth, and therefore never be able to communicate