Exam 1 Cases Flashcards

1
Q

Ward v Rock Against Racism

A

New York City officials could control the volume of amplified music at rock concerts in Central Park without violating the First Amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lovell v. City of Griffin

A

Jehovah’s witness case
Pasisng out pamphlets(distributing and publishing lit. is a constiutional right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

City of Ladue v. Gilleo

A

City officials could not flatly prohibit homeowners from displaying political signs on their own property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R.A.V. V. St. Paul

A

Court overturned a St. Paul, Minnesota, ordinance intended to punish those who burn crosses, display swastikas, or express racial or religious hatred in other ways.
-RAV burned a cross in a afrina ameircan man’s yard.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

New York Times v. US (Pentagon Papers)

A

The Supreme Court voted 6-3 to set aside the prior restraint and allow the publication of articles based on the Pentagon Papers.
-The papers did not present a suffiencient national security risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Cohen v. California

A

Offensiveness alone is not a good enough reason to punish individuals using provocative langauge.
“Fuck the draft”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

US v. O’Brien

A

expressive content may be regulated if the government meets certain standards, intermediate scrutiny.
-Burning of a draft card

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Virginia v. Black

A

Cross-burning is protected by the First Amendment—but not when the act is an attempt to intimidate someone rather than an expression of symbolic speech.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing

A

Ruled that newsracks are a legitimate form of expression in a public forum protected by the First Amendment, and a city may not base decisions to grant or deny newsrack space on the content of the publication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Near v. Minnesota

A

Supreme Court made it clear that prior restraints are generally improper in America
-Minnesota state statute that allowed government officials to treat a “malicious, scandalous and defamatory newspaper” as a public nuisance and forbid its publication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Bland v. Roberts

A

Facebook like button
“That a user may use a single mouse click to produce that message that he likes the page instead of typing the same message with several individual key strokes is of no constitutional significance.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Snyder v. Phelps

A

Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that the WBC’s funeral picketing activities and website (www.godhatesfags.com) were protected under the First Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Janus v. AFSCE

A

By a 5-4 vote, the majority struck down mandatory union dues and overruled Abood.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Boy Scouts of Americ v. Dale

A

The 5-4 majority ruled that the Boy Scouts may exclude gays as troop leaders, declaring that a private organization has the right to set its own moral code and espouse a viewpoint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

US v. Alvarez

A

Overtruned the Stolen Valor Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

McCullen v. Coakley

A

The Court struck down a Massachusetts buffer zone in McCullen v. Coakley (573 U.S. 464). The 2007 law had made it a crime for anyone to stand on a public road or sidewalk within 35 feet of any abortion clinic