Exam 1- Epidiemology Flashcards

(41 cards)

1
Q

Strength of association

A

association between exposure and outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Temporality

A

MOST IMPORTANT; an exposure must precede the occurence of a disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Biological gradient

A

risk of disease being related to degree of exposure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Plausibilty

A

biological plausibility of hypothesis, biological mechanism to explain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Coherence

A

Should not conflict with what is known of natural history

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

analogy

A

one drug causes a defect, similar will to…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Specificity

A

LEAST IMPORTANT; exposure should lead to a single effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Experimental Evidence

A

Reduction in exposure is associated with reduction in risk and vise versa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Prevalence

A

Number of EXISTING CASES at a specified time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Incidence

A

number of NEW CASES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Relative Risk

A

measure of association in cohort studies because incidence can be measured in them, how common disease is among the exposed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

RR=1

A

null association, no difference in disease between the two groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

RR > 1

A

means exposure increases risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

RR<1

A

exposure decreases risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Odds Ratio

A

measure of association in CASE CONTROL and CROSS-SECTIONAL studies; indirect estimate of RR as incidence cannot be measured in these studies; tells how common the exposure is among the diseased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Can measure incidence

A

cohort studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

cannot measure incidence

A

Case control and cross-sectional

18
Q

OR=1

A

no difference in exposure history between cases and controls

19
Q

OR<1

A

exposure history is less common

20
Q

OR >1

A

exposure history is more common among cases

21
Q

Attributable risk

A

absolute risk difference or the percentage of cases due to a given exposure

22
Q

how much long cancer can actually be attributed to smoking

A

attributed risk

23
Q

Attributable proportion

A

proportion of people who developed disease due to exposure

24
Q

Bias

A

a systemic error in conduct of study based on selection of groups not being comparable, differences in information collected from study groups

25
Confounding
the observed relationship between the dependent and independent variables is due to a third varibale
26
gray hair associated to heart disease, really it is
age- confounding variable
27
counterfactual model
comparing the experience of a population exposed to a factor with the experience of the same population at the same time but without the exposure (can't, so use substitute population)
28
ways to control confounding
- randomization, restriction - matching; forces distribution of matching factors to be identical in various study groups - analysis: look at the OR, multivariable analysis
29
descriptive studies
Case reports, case series, and cross-sectional; | you cannot assert causation; not a true experimental study
30
Case reports and case series
types of descriptive studies, with no controls so you cannot assert causation; not a true experimental study
31
Cross sectional
a type of descriptive study; made at ONE POINT in time so temporality is NOT known and hence causation cannot be ascertained (think snapshot view)
32
Cohort studies
follow exposed and unexposed people around, expensive, based on independent predictor variable; include prospective and Retro
33
Prospective Cohort study
follow subjects without disease (see if they get it)
34
Retrospective cohort study
both exposure and disease have happened in the past
35
Case Control Studies
ID people with disease and suitable non disease individuals as controls (Retrospective design, must have controls with similar chance of exposure, Incidence CANNOT be measured)
36
Experimental studies/clinical trials
researcher assigns exposure; these people provide highest level of epidemiological evidence; Blinding and randomization; includes validity (ext and int) and reliability
37
Internal validity
study is done without methodological problems
38
external validity
study accurately reflecting events that would occur in real situation
39
Meta Analysis and Systemic Reviews
studies of studies; PROVIDE the HIGHEST level of confidence
40
Provide the highest level of evidence
systemic reviews
41
Co-relational/ecological
individual exposure level not available (study populations)-type of descriptive study