Exam 1 Halpern Slides Terms Flashcards

(177 cards)

1
Q

business law

A

enforceable set of rules of conduct that govern commercial relationships (actions of buyers and sellers in exchanges)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Functional Areas Affected by Business Law

A
  • Marketing
  • R & D
  • Accounting and Finance
  • HR
  • Production
  • Transportation
  • Management
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Private Law

A

Disputes between private individuals or groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Public Law

A

Disputes between a private entity (individual or group) and THEIR government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Civil Law

A

Rights and responsibilities between persons OR persons and their government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Criminal Law

A

Incidents where someone commits an act against the public as a whole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sources for BLaw

A

Constitutions
Statutes
Cases
Administrative Law
Treaties
Exec. Orders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Identification with the Vulnerable

A

A school of legal interpretation

Connected to the pursuit of fairness in our society

Think of looking out for the poor, elderly, disabled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Historical School

A

Past practice is assumed to have been the product of careful thought

Stare decisis and originalism are used here

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Stare Decisis

A

Standing by decision (rulings made in a higher court are binding precedents for a lower court)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Originalism

A

The idea that texts should be interpreted according to their “original meanings”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Legal Realism

A

A school of legal thought

Idea that the more than the law is to be considered when ruling a case

Typically more progressive, acknowledging the fact we are in an ever-changing society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cost-Benefit Analysis

A

Examine all the costs and benefits for alternative laws or decisions and place monetary values on those costs and benefits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ethics

A

Study of decisions, evaluating what is good or right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Hypothetical School of Interpretation

A

Deals with claims of things such as discrimination denying a promotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Business Ethics

A

Application of ethics to scenarios involving businesspeople

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Social Responsibility of Business

A

The expectations of the community for a firm doing business in the community

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ethical Dilemma

A

When a firm has a situation in which there is no clear/correct decision to make

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Business Ethics

A

Refers to the standards of business conduct

Does not result in a set of correct decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Morals

A

Performance expectations a culture has at any time for business behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Ethics (when compared to morals)

A

MORE complicated set of expectations because it is about what morals SHOULD be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Legality is _____

A

the minimum standard that must be met when moving forward with a business decision (just because something is legal, does not mean it is good)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Values

A

Starting point for business ethics

values underlie conversations about business ethics

We derive our ethics from the interplay of values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Values that influence Business Ethics

A

Freedom
Security
Justice
Efficiency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Freedom as a Value
Acting without restriction Possessing the capacity or resources to act as one wishes
23
Security as a Value
Possess a large enough supply for basic needs Safety from those who want to interfere with our property rights
24
Justice as a value
To receive the products of our labor Provide resources in proportion to need Treat all equally
25
Efficiency as a value
Maximize wealth in society Minimizing costs Highest net income from an output
26
WH Process of Ethical Decision making
W- who are the stake holders H- how should the decision be made
27
Who are the stakeholders in ethical decision making?
Customers investors management employees community Future generations
28
How should a decision be made in ethical decision-making?
Public disclosure Universalization Golden rule
29
Golden rule
treat others the way you want to be treated
30
Public Disclosure test
think about the reaction if the headlines were our decision
31
Universalization Test
What would happen if everyone copied our action?
32
Trial Courts
Hold original jurisdiction, the power to hear and decide cases when they FIRST enter the legal system
33
Appellate Courts
Can review previous judicial decisions Do NOT hold trials, they review transcripts of previous proceedings
34
Question of Law
When an issue is surrounding how the law is being applied or viewed Appellate courts ONLY handle this ONLY judges can decide a question of law
35
Question of Fact
Questions about a specific thing to the case (event, characteristic, party involved, etc.) Trial courts determine these Bench trial = judge decides it Jury trial = jury decides questions of fact
36
Types of jurisdiction
Original Appellate In personam Subject-Matter
37
Original jurisdiction
Power to hear and decide cases when they first enter the legal system
38
Appellate jurisdiction
power to review PREVIOUS judicial decisions to determine whether trial courts had an error in their decision
39
In personam jurisdiction
The power to render a decision affecting the rights of specific persons before the court Extends over a specific geographic region
40
Subject-matter jurisdiction
The power to hear certain kinds of cases
41
Corporations subject to in personam jurisdiction where?
- State of incorporation - Location of main offices - Areas where they conduct business
42
Long-Arm Statutes
Most states have these, basically means that they maintain in personam jurisdiction if someone tries to flee
43
Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction covers
Admiralty Bankruptcy Federal criminal prosecutions state sues a state claims against the US patent and copyright
44
Subject-matter jurisdiction: states
Hear all cases NOT under exclusive federal jurisdiction
45
Concurrent Federal and State Jurisdiction, what causes this?
Federal question cases (interpretation of Constitution, statute, or treaty) Diversity of citizenship cases
46
Diversity of Citizenship cases must
Plaintiff does NOT reside in the same state as the defendant Controversy concerns over $75k Use the location of a party's residence to determine if this exists. For businesses it uses incorporation or main business place
47
Jurisdiction
the power of a court to hear a case and render decisions that bind the parties before them
48
Venue
the MOST appropriate geographical location where a case should be heard typically where the parties reside, or where the case began
49
Plaintiff choices for venue
- Trial court in defendant's county - If property is involved, it is where the property is - Specific incident, use the place where the incident was
50
US Court System
Supreme Court = 9 justices Intermediate courts of appeal (11 numbered circuits in the U.S., Texas is 5) Federal Trial Courts (94)
51
State Court Systems
Replicate the US version, just state edition
52
Threshold for Litigation
Must be standing to sue (can trace an action to the defendant that harmed plaintiff) Case or Controversy (actions of one party give rise to the legal dispute) Ripeness (decision is able to affect the parties immediately)
53
Jury Selection
AKA "voir dire" Make sure jurors can be unbiased Peremptory challenge = challenge a juror without a reasaon
54
Examination of Witnesses
Plaintiff has the burden of proving the case, presents first All examinations (direct, cross, redirect, re-cross) Leading questions (attorneys can ask on a cross-exam), basically forcing an answer
55
Discovery
Occurs after the pleadings Exchange of relevant documents and evidence amongst the parties Can interrogate, request to produce documents, and request admission of facts
56
Appeals...
Prejudicial error of law MUST exist to successfully appeal Appeals are only on the record, there is no additional evidence they can consider Typically, only one appeal to an intermediate court of appeal is allowed
57
Available decisions to an Appellate Court
Affirmation (agree) Modification (adjust) Reversal (change to favor other party) Remand (return the case to re-do it)
58
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Resolution of legal disputes through methods other than litigation
59
Examples of ADR
Negotiation Mediation Arbitration Summary Jury Trials Mini-trials neutral case evaluations private trials
60
Why ADR?
Quicker and cheaper More control over the outcome, avoid the uncertainty Do not want precedent Privacy (businesses like this) Preserve a relationship
61
Negotiation (ADR)
Bargaining process in which the parties try to solve things informally (don't NEED lawyers). No need for a 3rd party
62
Mediation
Voluntarily select a neutral party (typically someone very knowledgeable in the area) and have them try to facilitate the discussion and offer potential solutions everything remains confidential
63
Arbitration
Resolved by a neutral 3rd party, non-judicial Parties agree to go to arbitration Has a hearing like a trial Arbitrator's decision is LEGALLY BINDING Arbitrator is more active than a judge, no record of hearing is kept
64
Arbitrator's Award
Provided within 30 days of the hearing The decision is called an award Do not need to offer any reasoning, not bound by precedent Legally binding
65
Advantages of Mediation (ADR)
Preserve relationships Find a new solution not thought of Those involved have a lot of control
66
Disadvantages of Mediation (ADR)
Hides power imbalances (the stronger party can't get the stronger result) Some use it as a way of delaying things, don't want a mediation solution
67
Advantages of Arbitration (ADR)
Quicker and cheaper than litigation Parties can choose the arbitrator More flexible decision-making than a judge
68
Disadvantages of Arbitration (ADR)
Often used, making it less efficient and more expensive Tough to appeal the award More severe punishments in litigation Companies and employers can hide their disputes, good for them, bad for the public
69
Binding Arbitration Clause
Provision in a contract mandating that any disputes relating to the contract have to be settled by arbitration Often includes the process of selecting the arbitrator
70
Med-Arb (ADR)
Mediation-Arbitration If mediation fails, go to arbitration
71
Summary Jury Trial
A quick trial with a non-binding verdict. Let the parties see how the case would go. They can choose to accept, reject, or compromise decision
72
Mini-trial
Neutral third party offers an opinion on what the verdict would be in a trial
73
Early Neutral Case Evaluation
Parties have a neutral third party, explain their positions, and the third party evaluates each side's argument to try and reach a settlement
74
Private trials
Referee selected and paid for by the parties, offering a legally binding judgment
75
Administrative Law
Consists of substantive and procedural rules created by administrative agencies
76
Administrative agencies
any governmental body of the city, county, state, or federal government
77
Administrative Law Judge
Presides over administrative hearing, can try to encouragement a settlement but can render a binding decision
78
Making an administrative agency
Statute specifies its name, functions, and specific powers. It grants the agency rulemaking, and investigation of issues under its powers and adjudication of cases arising from its powers and rules.
79
Rule Making (administrative agency)
Enabling statutes permit agencies to issue rules that control both INDIVIDUALS and BUSINESSES behaviors Same effect as laws
80
Investigation (Administrative agency)
Enabling statutes grant executive power to agencies to investigate potential violations of their rules or statutes
81
Adjudication (administrative agency)
Enabling statutes delegate judicial power to agencies to settle or adjudicate individual disputes that an agency has with businesses or individuals
82
Subpoena
An order to appear at a particular place and time, to provide testimony
83
Subpoena duces tecum
An order to appear AND bring specified documents
84
Who presides over an administrative agency hearing?
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
85
Consent Order
ALJ tries to convince parties to reach a settlement through this A statement in which a company agrees to stop the disputed behavior, but does NOT admit that it broke the law
86
Order (Adjudication)
ALJ can render a binding decision, aka an order
87
Elements of a Crime
Must be a guilty act in the wrong state of mind
88
Actus Reus
Wrongful behavior (guilty act)
89
Mens Rea
In the wrong state of mind (bad intent, knowledge, etc)
90
Felony
Serious crime, imprisonment for more than a year, or death penalty
91
Misdemeanor
A less serious than felony but still a sizable crime Punishable by a fine and/or imprisonment up to a year
92
Petty Offenses
Minor misdemeanor punishable by a small fine and/or short sentence
93
White Collar Crime
NONVIOLENT illegal act against society, typically in business
94
Examples of white collar crime
bribery extortion fraud embezzlement computer crimes
95
Bribery
Offering or receiving money/ an object of value for the purpose of influencing a person in a position of trust
96
Extortion (blackmail)
Making a THREAT for the purpose of obtaining money or property
97
Fraud
INTENTIONALLY misrepresents to gain an advantage over another
98
3 Elements for fraud
A materially false representation, MADE with the intent to deceive someone Victim reasonably relies on the false representation Damages occur to the victim
99
Embezzlement
Wrongful conversion of another's property by one who is lawfully in possession of that property Think about a fraternity cabinet dinner (taking people's dues to fund their own dinner, not an event for the fraternity)
100
Computer Crime
Any wrongful act that is direct against computers made with computers OR uses computers to continue criminal activity
101
Criminal Procedure
Set of rules that govern the adjudication process through which the government enforces substantive criminal law
102
In Criminal Procedure...
government is prosecutor objective is punishment (fine/imprisonment) Many constitutional safeguards for the criminal defendant
103
Civil procedure
Plaintiff can be an individual, business, or government entity Objective is to repair the damages to the plaintiff
104
Tort
A civil wrong or injury to another, giving the injured party the right to bring a lawsuit against the wrongdoer to recover compensation
105
Intentional Torts
Defendant takes an action INTENDING a specific result, or knowing a result is likely
106
Negligent Torts
Occurs when the defendant acts in a careless way that subjects other people to an unreasonable risk of harm
107
Strict Liability Torts
The defendant undertakes an "inherently dangerous action" in which no one can complete this action safely regardless of any precautions that could be taken
108
Intentional Torts
It is assumed that people intend the "normal consequences" of their actions throwing a rock at a group of people, it is assumed that you intended to hit someone
109
Types of intentional torts
Assault Battery Defamation
110
Assault
One person places another in fear/apprehension of immediate, offensive and/or harmful bodily contact must feel the fear and that feeling must be reasonable
111
Battery
Intentional unwanted bodily contact
112
Defenses available to the defendant in battery
Consent (was it given?) Self-defense (fight w equal force) Defense of others (fight w equal force) Defense of property (reasonable force to defend property)
113
Defamation
Intentional publication of a FALSE statement to harm someone's reputation Anyone who republishes/repeats the defamatory statement is liable for defamation. EVEN WHEN CITING SOURCE
114
Libel
Defamation that is published in a permanent form (magazine, radio, broadcast)
115
Slander
Oral defamation Must prove speical damages to recover said damages
116
Slander Per Se
Exception to requirement of special damages Statement that is so harmful that damages are presumed
117
Defenses to Defamation
Truth (bc it true, not false, MUST BE FACT) Privilege (defendant admits to the accusation, but argues they shouldn't be liable)
118
Absolute Privilege
One cannot be sued for defamation for any false statements made regardless of intent or knowledge of the falsity of the claim happens for those speaking in DC on floor during debates
119
Conditional Privilege
Party cannot be held liable, unless statement made w actual malice (made knowing it was false, or recklessly disregarding its truth)
120
Privacy Torts
False light: the publicity of something about a person makes an impression that is not valid publicizing a private fact that a reasonable person would find highly offensive Using another person's likeness for commercial gain without permission Intrusion on an individual's affairs or seclusion
121
Intentional Torts against property
Trespass to Realty Private Nuisance Trespass to personal property conversion
122
Trespass to realty
enter the land of another without permission cause an object to be placed on the land of another without permission stay on the land after being told to leave refusing to remove something that the landowner asked to have removed
123
Private Nuisance
Person uses their property in an unreasonable manner harming a neighbor's use of their property imagine just blaring speakers
124
Public Nuisance
Party acts in a way endangering the property/health/safety/welfare of the community (public official must bring these)
125
Trespass to personal property
Temporary control over another's personal property, or interfering with their right to use the property responsible for damages caused to the property as well as the damages caused to the owner related to the trespasser's wrongful possession of the property
126
Conversion
Person permanently removes personal property from the owner's possession and control true owner can not regain the property anymore
127
Disparagement
false statement of MATERIAL FACT resulting in a damage to a business's reputation or a product's reputation
128
Intentional Interference With Contract
Defendant knows the contract and its terms Defendant intentionally tries to cause a breach of contract and injuries result
129
Unfair Competition
Against economic interests, defendant unreasonably interferes with the plaintiff's opportunity to earn profit Working together to drive someone out of business
130
Elements of Fraudulent Misrepresentation
defendant misrepresents facts/conditions intent to have another rely on the misrepresentation plaintiff reasonably relies on the misrepresentation plaintiff suffered damages from reliance on the misrepresentation
131
Negligence
Failure to exercise reasonable care to protect another's person or property, leading to an unreasonable risk of harm to others
132
Elements of Negligence
Must establish that the defendant owes a duty to the plaintiff (use the "reasonable person standard" for care and skill offered) Breach of duty causation (actual v. proximate) damages must occur
133
Duty (of a business)
Businesses take care of customers on property, must warn about any risks
134
Actual Cause
Defendant's breach of duty resulted in the plaintiff's injury Damages would not have occurred without the defendant's actions
135
Proximate Cause
Extent to which a defendant can be held liable for the consequences of their actions Proximate cause is determined by foreseeability (plaintiff and plaintiff's damages were reasonably foreseeable at the time the defendant breached their duty)
136
Res Ipsa Loquitur
"the thing speaks for itself" allows the judge to infer that the defendant's negligence caused the harm. No direct evidence of lack of due care tho
137
Negligence Per Se
Negligence In Itself Defendant violates a statute enacted to try and prevent a certain type of harm Defendant's violation causes harm that the statute TRIES to prevent, it is negligence per se Plaintiff establishes proof of negligence
138
Defenses to negligence
contributory negligence comparative negligence assumption of the risk superseding cause
139
contributory negligence
Defendant can avoid ALL liability proving the plaintiff had negligence leading to the damages
140
To prove contributory negligence...
Must prove plaintiff's conduct fell below the standard fo care needed to prevent unreasonable risk of harm The plaintiff's failure was a contributing cause of the plaintiff's injury
141
Last-clear-chance doctrine
Allows the plaintiff to recover damages DESPITE proof of contributory negligence as long as the defendant had the FINAL CLEAR opportunity to avoid the action
142
Comparative negligence
Used to more fairly allocate responsibility for an accdient
143
Pure comparative negligence
court determines the % at fault the defendant is, they are then liable for that % of damages
144
Modified comparative negligence
defendant must be at LEAST 50% at fault for the plaintiff to recover
145
Assumption of the risk
defendant must prove the plaintiff VOLUNTARILY assumes the risk of the harm that they incurred
146
How to express assumption of the risk
plaintiff expressly agrees to assume the risk (typically done in a contract) think ab a waiver before skydiving
147
implied assumption of the risk
plaintiff implicitly assumed a known risk
148
Good Samaritan Statutes
does not offer negligence for people trying to voluntarily aid those in serious threat
149
Superseding Cause
defense when something that happens after an accident makes the injury worse
150
Strict Liability
Liability WITHOUT fault Must have serious risk, and can not be done safely at all. Not performed in the immediate community typically
151
Damages Available in Tort Cases
Compensatory Damages Nominal Damages Punitive Damages
152
Compensatory Damages
designed to compensate the victim for the harm caused
153
Nominal damages
smal amount of money given to recognize that the tort was committed, but the plaintiff did not experience or could not prove actual damages
154
Punitive damages
Imposed to punish the defendant for extremely outrageous conduct deter the defendant and others from committing future offenses that are similar
155
Intellectual property
property coming from creativity
156
Types of Intellectual property
trademarks trade dress copyrights patents trade secrets
157
trademark
distinctive mark, word, design, picture, or arrangement used by a seller in conjunction with a product consumer identifies the product with the producer To use inside a state (intrastate) it is protected under state common law
158
Interstate use of a trademark
register with the U.S. patent and trademark office renew it between 5th and 6th year, then renew every 10 years following that Remedies are money damages and injunction
159
Trade Dress
Overall appearance and image of a product same protection as a trademark The main focus is whether or not confusion in the two products would occur think ab jack daniels scenario from class w dog toy
160
Copyright
Protect the expression of a creative idea Examples: books, periodicals, musical compositions, plays, motion pictures, sound recordings, lectures, works of art, computer programs
161
Criteria for Copyright
Fixed (tangible medium of expression) original creative
162
Remedies for copyright infringement
Money damages (if the copyrighted work is registered) Injunction
163
"Fair Use" Doctrine
portion of copyrighted work that may be reproduced for "criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarships, and research)
164
"Fair Use" Factors
Purpose and character of use (good or bad reason to use) nature of the copyrighted work amount and substantiality of portion used in relation to the whole copyrighted work Effect of use on the potential market for the copyrighted work
165
Patents
Protect a product, process, invention, machine, or plant produced by asexual reproduction
166
Criteria for a patent
Must be new must be useful (or a design) Must be nonobvious
167
Patent protection
Last 20 years Gives the EXCLUSIVE right to produce, sell, and use the object of the patent
168
remedies for patent infringement
money damages injunction someone can challenge the patent, asking the USPTO to re-examine it
169
Tying arrangement (unlawful)
Holder issues a license to use the patented object, only if the licensee agrees to buy a NON-PATENTED product from the holder
170
Cross-licensing (unlawful)
Two patent holders license each other to use their patents, in the condition no one else gets the license without both consenting
171
America Invents Act of 2011
Changed the patent system to give a patent to the first to file a patent application (NO LONGER THE FIRST INVENTOR) Expanded the rules on what is patentable, so it is TOUGHER to get one Changed the re-examination process to be more like litigation Prohibits a plaintiff from filing suit against many unrelated defendants, increasing the number of patent infringement cases filed Made it easier/more affordable for a small business to apply for one
172
Trade Secret
process/product/operation/information giving a businessperson an advantage over competitors Protected by the common law from unlawful appropriation by competitors as long as it is kept secret and consists of elements not generally known in the trade
173
Trade secret versus patent protection
frequently used as an alternative to patents trade secrets protect the invention in perpetuity, but once someone discovers it lawfully protection is lost patents give 20 years, then everyone gets it. plus it can be challenged and lost early
174
Remedies for trade secret infringement
Money damages/injunction also allows the holder to sue for violation, MUST prove: trade secret exists acquired secret through unlawful means used secret without permission