Exam 2 Flashcards
(158 cards)
What is the intrinsic/economic utility of expressing a private preference in public?
Impact of expressing private preferences on public outcome: policy rewards of vote. Probably always positive, negligible in large groups, highest in small groups
What is the expressive/psychological utility of expressing private preferences in public?
Need for individuality, autonomy, dignity, integrity. Probably always positive, but weight depends on personality type
What is the expressive utility for a conformist personality type?
Happy to go along with the group, doesn’t need to contradict. A little positive utility for the expressive utility. The greater the degree of preference falsification, the larger loss of expressive utility.
What is the expressive utility for a non-conformist personality type?
It really hurts to hold belief inside. Get more positive utility for the expressive utility
What are the types of reputational/social utility?
Social punishments/rewards and/or material punishment/rewards
What is reputational/social utility?
Can be positive or negative, but we are more interested in negative values. Manipulable, especially by the state
When does Kuran say you don’t simplify your preference?
Intrinsic utility + expressive utility + reputational utility > 0. For our purposes, we can chop out intrinsic utility, since it is so negligibly low. So, you don’t falsify preferences when expressive utility > reputational utility
How is there a variance across regime types in preference falsification?
Reputational costs are higher in closed/authoritarian politics, so preference falsification is lower in open/democratic politics. Yet, no democracy can guarantee the exercise of expressive freedoms
Do all regimes care about public opinion?
Yes, even if it is based on preference falsification. If everyone you see seems to support the regime (even if just preference falsification), no one will be brave enough to say down with the regime. The one millionth person to say down with the regime is much less likely to be punished than the first person. So, no one wants to put themself on the line and be the first one if they don’t know the public opinion
What is the problem of preference falsification for individuals?
You want to express your opinions publicly (expressive utility) but you don’t know others’ true opinions (reputational costs)- you don’t know how the regime will respond, but how much is preference falsification. Your reputational costs depend partly on the distribution of public opinion
What are the tradeoffs for a person when deciding whether or not to preference falsifying?
Preference falsification ensures the loss of expressive utility, but not falsifying preferences risks reputational costs
What is the solution to preference falsification for individuals?
Each person decides whether to falsify preferences, some suffer reputational costs, which others observe, everyone updates their beliefs about public opinion and may change their behavior accordingly
What is pluralistic ignorance?
People are bad at evaluating true public opinion, due to underestimating preference falsification. They assume most people are expressing their true views. The regime also suffers from this, overestimating their amount of supprt
What is a bandwagon?
Happens when perception of true public opinion shifts, perhaps resulting in new equilibrium. Realize the costs aren’t as high, less people will preference falsify, and bandwagon. This is when the regime loses control
What is heuristic knowledge?
Decision making shortcuts, rule of thumb
What is hard knowledge?
Knowledge grounded in substantive facts and systematic reasoning
What is soft knowledge?
Knowledge based on others opinions. On the assumption that others have reasons for taking the positions they do, we will internalize whatever opinion seems dominant. Relies on the heuristics of social proof
What strengthens soft knowledge?
Rational ignorance, numbers, repetition (due to the availability heuristics), deliberate distortions of public speakers, and censorship
What is the “illusion of individual autonomy”?
The flimsiest suggestion as to the merits of a political opinion may serve as grounds for embracing it with confidence. Should the need arise for justifying a borrowed opinion we will do so easily. Our justification often comes from slogans, generalization, and assertions offered by the mass media
What is belief perseverance?
Tendency to interpret new information according to existing beliefs
How do people deal with inconsistencies with belief perseverance?
Bifurcating incoming information. Ideological side: abstract worldview. Pragmatic side: how to get by in daily life.
What is the difference of belief perseverance change under different types of knowledge?
Our beliefs about complex and abstract systems rarely change, because they cannot be falsified with hard knowledge (especially economics and politics). But beliefs based on social proof can radically change under certain circumstances (if social proof changes rapidly, your opinion can change rapidly as well).
How do preference falsification change INTRAgenerationally?
High reputational costs induce preference falsification. Widespread preference falsification leads to the rise of public consensus.
How does preference falsification change INTERgenerationally?
Public consensus exists, so costs of status quo and benefits of alternatives aren’t discussed, and facts are denied. In the absence of debate and facts, private positions move closer to public consensus. Preference falsification declines. Older generations with private knowledge of alternatives dies out, leaving the younger generation without such knowledge, true believers