Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Judicial Processing > Exam 2 > Flashcards

Exam 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Terry vs. Ohio (1968)

A

Stop and frisk. Police have the authority to frisk for weapons w/o probable cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does a stop do?

A

Prevent criminal activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

US vs. Sokolow (1989)

A

totality of circumstances determined reasonable suspicion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A frisk does not…

A

Automatically follow a stop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

No warrant for stop and frisk…

A

Can lead to arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Minnesota vs. Dickerson (1993)

A

Frisk is a pat down of clothing “plain feel”. Illegal stop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Penn vs. Mimms (1977)

A

Motorist can be stooped for reasonable suspicion, driver can be asked to step out car, frisk would need reasonable suspicion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

US vs. Montoya de Hernandez (1985)

A

Balloon swallower, rectal examination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Florida vs Royer (1983)

A

You don’t have to answer questions, but refusal can give a cop a right to frisk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hiibel vs. 6th Judicial Court Nevada (2004)

A

required to provide name to officer, can be arrested if you don’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dunaway vs. NY (1979)

A

Must have probable cause to interrogate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Michigan vs. Chestnut (1988)

A

Ran from the police and threw something out on the ground. Probable cause was there for the seizure to happen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Florida vs. Bostick (1991)

A

A person doesn’t have to hand their bag to an officer if there is no reasonable suspicion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Wilson vs. Arkansas (1995)

A

if there is a potential for danger to officer or people inside the house police do not have to knock and announce their entrance for warrants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Peyton vs NY (1980)

A

in the absence of emergency circumstances or consent, the police may not enter a ho e to make a warrantless arrest when there was time to get a warrant and nobody gave permission to the search

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Brigham City, Utah vs. Stuart (2006)

A

??????

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Warden vs. Hayden (1967)

A

Yes because of probable cause and exigent circumstances. Hot pursuit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Welsh vs. WI (1984)

A

warrantless nighttime entry to a person’s home to make an arrest for a nonjailable traffic arrest is unconstitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

US vs. Verdugo-Urquidez

A

the 4th amendments against unreasonable search and seizure applied to whether not an alien’s home could be searched

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

US vs. Martinez-Fuerte (1976)

A

Fixed checkpoint stops are legal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

US vs. Brignoni-Pounce (1975)

A

Driving while Mexican is not a reason to stop someone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

US vs. Robinson (1973)

A

Officers can search a person after a frisk for evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Chimel vs. California (1969)

A

Searches within a persons wingspan is legal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Vale vs. Louisiana (1970)

A

Officers cannot come back the next day to search, it must happen at the same time as arrest

25
NY vs. Belton (1981)
the police may conduct a search and includes containers, enclosed or open glove compartments, consoles, as well as luggage, boxes, bags, clothing, and similar items in the passenger compartment. Vin number is not protected
26
US vs. Ross (1982)
Officers can search trunk with probable cause
27
Maryland vs. Buie (1990)
Reasonable suspicion officers can do a protective sweep
28
Tennessee vs. Gardner (1985)
Cannot shoot a person for running for cops
29
Scott vs. Harris (2007)
Officers can bump cars off the road if they have potential danger to others
30
Graham vs. Connor (1989)
Objective
31
Russell vs. US
Looked at prior disposition to make the drug before, even though the agent supplied one ingredient
32
Olmsted vs. US (1928)
Wire tapping Not if they are done properly without trespassing into a constitutionally protected area
33
Katz vs. US (1967)
Privacy is expected when on a public phone
34
Zurcher vs. Standford (1978)
Searches of property not suspected of crimes is permissible , even if you don’t think they had anything to do with the crime
35
Scope of search and seizure
Driven by what you are looking for/ what specified in the search warrant
36
MI vs. Summers (1981)
Police may detain a person on the premises while a search is conducted
37
Stoner vs. California (1964)
a. The police cannot search your hotel room without a warrant just because the hotel clerk lets them in
38
NJ vs. T.L.O (1985)
2 girls smoking in the bathroom. Principal needs reasonable suspicion to search students bags
39
Stafford United School vs. Redding(2009)
Searched Redding's undergarments unreasonable
40
US vs. Matlock (1974)
a. When the prosecution seeks to justify a warrantless search, it is okay to obtain permission from a third part who contains common authority
41
GA vs. Randolph (2006)
a. Police may search a house when a co-tenant that is present specifically refused to allow a search
42
Illinois vs. Rodriquez (1990)
a. Police show up & a third party lets them in the house to search but they did not have commons authority to allow for this
43
Bell vs. Wolfish (1979)
Rights are stripped away in prison
44
Hudson vs. Palmer (1984)
????????
45
Griffin vs. WI
a. It is constitutional for probationers to search probationer’s home based on reasonable suspicion
46
Schmerber vs. CA (1966)
c. Considered an exigent circumstance & it is legal & they did not need a warrant for the blood sample because the BAC will go down
47
Kyllo vs. US (2001)
Using a heat index device/thermal imaging is unreasonable if you do not have a search warrant because of the whole detecting something from outside the home
48
US vs. Place
a. If the police use a dog, they must be legally in the place where the search takes police
49
FL vs. Harris (2013)
Dog gave officer probable cause to search the vehicle
50
FL vs. Jardines
Must be legally at a location in order to search.
51
Carroll vs US (1925)
68 bottle of gin and whiskey were found in a search. Officers can search cars with probable cause
52
Deleware vs. Prouse (1979)
Cannot make a random stop to check drivers license and registration
53
MI Depatment Police vs. Sitz (1990)
Checkpoints are legally if all vehicles are stopped
54
Penn vs. Muiz (1990)
Physical evidence is not protected by the 5th amendment
55
AZ vs. Grant (2009)
Serched car after suspended license arrest. Not legal
56
SD vs. Opperman (1976)
Routine inventory of car after it was compounded and found marijuana
57
Coolidge vs. New Hampshire (1971)
a. Warrantless searches of cars which are on private property & not in use at the time of the search are unconstitutional
58
California vs. Carney (1985)
Mobil home was on public property so the police could search it without a warrant

Judicial Processing (1 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions