Exam 2 Flashcards
(33 cards)
Common ground
mutual knowledge, beliefs, and suppositions shared by two or more people; communal-comprised of insider and outsider information; personally-based on shared experiences and actions
Theory of mind
naïve theory of human psychology; to understand that others have beliefs, desires, intentions, and perspectives that are different from one’s own
Cohesion
grammatical & lexical linking w/in a text or sentence that holds a text together and gives it meaning; connections among connective utterances or sentences using cohesive markers
Cohesive ties
logical links that make information clear; logical links to prior info
What are the qualitative changes in conversational skills as children develop that were described in the “Discourse development and impairments” lecture?
• Qualitative changes in conversational skills are:
o Stays on topic longer- this development is very gradual
9 yr olds barely take more turns on topic than 5 yr olds
Adolescents definitely take more turns on topic
9 yr olds do much less “recycling” of turns than 5 yr olds
o Makes greater number of relevant and factually related comments
o Shifts gracefully from one topic to another
o Adjusts content & style to listener
• These are gradual changes but fairly well-established by adolescence
What are the conversational problems typically experienced by intellectually disabled children? Children with Autism?
o MR & Autism:
Experience morpho-syntactic & semantic problems, but have additional difficulty in conversation because:
1. Have difficulty taking perspective of the listener
2. Relatively poor at simultaneously processing verbal and nonverbal information needed to understand topic, intentions, turn-taking, etc.
3. Have problems manipulating linguistic structure to accomplish milestones & to infer info;
What are the conversational problems typically experienced by children with SLI?
- Have problems manipulating linguistic structure to accomplish milestones & to infer info;
Do not tend to have overt conversational problems, but their morpho-syntactic and semantic problems cause them to have difficulty: - Introducing new topics/extending old topics
- Using any other cohesive ties other than pronouns
- Repairing breakdowns in ways other than phonetic breakdowns
- Entering multi-party conversations
No probs w/ structure of narratives
Probs comprehending/producing complete cohesive, and coherent narratives bc of morpho-syntactic & semantic deficits
Primary prob: linguistic structure to integrate narrative content
describe Grice’s maxims of communication.
- Quantity- be succinct
- Quality- be truthful & accurate
- Relation- be relevant
- Manner- be clear
What are the elements of a story grammar?
setting: place, time, characters; episodes: initiating event, problem, resolution
How does a personal narrative differ from a fictional narrative?
• Personal narrative: relates information about past experiences; the speak may also evaluate the events of the narrative to indicate what these events mean to her/him and what the events indicate about the speaker. Frequently have an Introducer or Abstract at the beginning to introduce the story into a conversation; also frequently have an evaluation of the event or incident and a coda- a closing that bridges the story to the current context or conversation
o Parts:
Introducer and/or Abstract- gets listener’s attn.; abstract provides an overview of event
Orientation- background/setting info
Complicating action- gives evaluative or emotional comments about the high point
Resolution- caps the event and resolves any complications
Coda- closes the story and bridges the end of the story to the present context
• Fictional narrative: have one or more than one episode;
Phrase
hierarchically structured, i.e., a phrase has a head and certain structures are implied to be contained w/in that phrase; head element obligatory
o Noun phrase- headed by noun
Determiners (this, that), articles, adjectives, prepositional phrases
o Verb phrase- headed by verb; obligatory: arguments and inflection; optional: prep phrase, adverbs, NPs
o Preposition– headed by prepositional phrase; obligates a noun phrase; codes for location, time, recipient, & possession
Clause
a syntactic construction containing a subject & a predicate and forming part of a [complex or compound] sentence or constituting a whole simple sentence
Verb
can require 1, 2, or 3 arguments
o transitive- transfer actions to object/person; requires agent/objects (2 args); 2-3
o Intransitive- do not transfer action to an object or person (I run; 1 argument)
o Copula- require 2 arguments
2 nominals (Shawn is a boy)
Person, object, or event + attribute (Shawn is handsome)
Arguments
the number of semantic elements required by that verb
Subordinating conjunctions
a type of dependent clause that is embedded in complex sentences; uses a subordinating conjunction to indicate one clause depends on the other; than, rather than, whether
Coordinating conjunctions
can be used to combine two independent clauses that have equal emphasis, thus forming a compound sentence; FANBOYS
Embedded propositions
o Multiple prepositions can be linked to each other and expressed in one sentence by embedding one basic proposition w/in another; one method is to embed a full proposition in a slot for a verb argument
o Complex sentences can also be formed by linking a full proposition to one of the stated arguments in another sentence; a linking word to clue this embedding is required: who
o Usually dependent clauses
Applebee’s stages of narrative development.
- Stage 1- Heap Stories: 2-3 yrs; consist of labels, description of events; contains no themes
- Stage 2- Sequence Stories: 3 yrs; child labels events that involve a key theme, character of setting; no plot, temporal or causal relationships not provided
- Stage 3- Primitive Narratives: 4-4 11/2 yrs; narrative contains core character, object, or event; contains initiating event, action, and consequence of that action; no real ending or resolution
- Stage 4- Chain narratives: 4.5-5 yrs; some cause & effect of temporal relationship; weak plot (lacks characters’ motivations & goals); attributes or characters of plot not provided; ending may not be logical
- Stage 5- True narrative: 5-7 yrs; contains: theme, central character (& motivations), plot; events are logical & temporal; ends w/ a resolution of the problem
How does context embedded language intervention differ from context reduced language intervention?
•Context-embedded—learner uses external cues and info such as facial gestures, real objects, and pictorial representations to enable understanding
oContext-embedded language—refers to communication that occurs in a context of shared understanding; language that is supported by contextual clues in the environment such as objects, props, manipulatives, pictures, graphs, charts, etc. to help make meaning from the spoken and written world; also a result of students interacting w/ e/o to get interpersonal clues to further construct meaning; A “here and now” context is necessary for input to be comprehensible
oBICS- Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills; describes social, conversational language used for oral communication; also described as social language; The language necessary for day to day living, including conversations with friends, informal interactions; comprehend social language by:
observing speakers’ non-verbal behavior (gestures, facial expressions and eye actions);
observing others’ reactions;
using voice cues such as phrasing, intonations, and stress;
observing pictures, concrete objects, and other contextual cues which are present; and
asking for statements to be repeated, and/or clarified.
•Context-reduced—learner must rely on linguistic cues and knowledge about language and text to understand meanings
oDecontextualized- few cues, if any, are present to support spoken/written words to help make language comprehensible; abstract and context is usually known only to author, i.e., textbooks, novel, lecture
oCALP- Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency; context-reduced lang of the academic classroom
non-verbal clues are absent;
there is less face-to-face interaction;
academic language is often abstract;
literacy demands are high (narrative and expository text and textbooks are written beyond the language proficiency of the students); and
cultural/linguistic knowledge is often needed to comprehend fully.
Cog undemanding/Context embedded
- Exchanges greetings
- Uses lang to request/command
- Carries on conversation
- Follows spoked direction w/ contextual supports
- Describes classroom objects/ persons
- Gives directions to peers
Cog undemanding/context reduced
- Relates personal experiences
- Talks about familiar topics w/o contextual support
- Reads notes, signs, directions
- Writes from direction
- Answers questions about stories/text w/ familiar context
Cog demanding/context embedded
- Follows directions for academic tasks
- Understands contextualized academic content
- Talk about less familiar topics with contextual support
Cog demanding/context-reduced
- Understands lectures on academic content
- Uses language to predict, reason, analyze, synthesize, evaluate
- Tells/writes explanations, persuasion
- Engages in deductive thought experiments
What are some techniques used to manipulate language use by a client in a context embedded treatment activity?
•Contextualized— comprehension significantly aided by knowledge of social/extralinguistic cues; aided by availability of immediate repair of miscomprehensions or by availability of clarification requests; there must be a gradual transfer from adult regulation of activities through talk –> child conscious use of self-talk to accomplish tasks–> child internal, automatic use of self-talk to accomplish tasks; approaches attempt to integrate content, form and use
oCorrection model/request—recasting the child’s utterances in a more complete form and asking the child to imitate
oIncomplete model/request—only the target is modeled for imitation
oError repetition/request—repeat the child’s error w/ rising intonation subtly signaling the need to correct
oSelf-correction request—a request for correction in which the SLP does not repeat the error
oContingent query—the SLP simply asks a question hoping to get a correction