Exam 2 Flashcards
(59 cards)
Determining Sample v. Population
Sample
A subset of the population (smaller in size)
Needs to be representative
Tested due to convenience
Determining Sample v. Population
Population
A group of data or people to which we want our research to refer
Is like the sample, only larger
Difficult to get access to these observations
Sample selection (sampling)
Determine population for research study Determine access to sample Determine representative sample size (G*Power program does this) Decide upon sampling method Get your participants!
The Interplay
Sample Size (1 to Infinity) Power (Low, Moderate, High) Alpha Level (0.01, 0.05) Effect Size (Small, Medium, Large)
Random sampling methods
Simple Random Sampling Systematic Sampling every Nth person Stratified Random Sampling (proportionate or non-proportionate) you split the group Cluster Random Sampling the groups were split for you
Nonrandom Sampling Methods
Convenience Sampling
drawing from people that are easiest to access
Quota Sampling- gathering representative data from a group
Purposive Sampling-sampling based on opinion of expert
Snowball Sampling-existing subjects recruit future subjects
Types of research
Non-Experimental Research
Experimental Research
Quasi experimental
Mixed methods research
non experimental research
descriptive relational predictive survey case study naturalistic observation archival
experimental research
differential, cause and effect
quasi ecperimental
same as expectational but with less control over participants and variables
mixed methods research
both experimental and non experimental components
research designs
Each research strategy has it’s own design options
Things to consider: Group versus Individual Within-subject versus Between-subject Variables included in study Analysis of variables
Research Procedures (Methodology)
How the variables will be manipulated How the variables will be regulated How the variables will be measured Necessary sample size Measures to be used Specific study procedures
Quantitative v. Qualitative Research
quantitative
Precise and Measurable
Most commonly seen in publications
Data is in numerical form and is statistically analyzed
Quantitative v. Qualitative Research
qualitative
Subjective and interpretive
Multimethod triangulation is used
Data is in categorical form or is made of observations
Maintaining Validity & Reliability
In Specific Instruments
(in chapter 3)
Called Instrumental Reliability & Validity
Determines whether each individual test or questionnaire does what it is supposed to do each time it’s used
Maintaining Validity & Reliability
In Overall Research
(in chapter 6)
Called Research Reliability & Validity
Determines whether the project as a whole is doing what you intended and can be replicated
Four Types of Research Validity
Internal Validity
Construct Validity
External Validity
Statistical Conclusion Validity
external validity
Extent to which we can generalize results of a research study Types- Population Ecological Temporal Treatment variation Outcome
Threat-
Not id target population
Not choosing broad enough sample
Statistical Conclusion Validity
Conclusions about the conversation of IV and DV -validity is based on research analysis Threats- Improper analysis Insufficient power Inaccurate effect size conclusions
Internal Research Validity
accurately identifying causation Threats: Ambiguous Temporal Precedence Events Outside the Laboratory (History) Maturation Effects of Repeat Testing Regression Effects Selection Mortality
Construct Research Validity
Measures adequately reflect operationalized construct
Threats:
Inadequate Explanation of Construct
Loose Connection Between Theory & Method
Ambiguous Effects of Independent Variables
Motivations & Reactivity of Participants
Experimenter Effects
Statistical Conclusion Research Validity
conclusions about the conversation of the IV and DV
This validity is based on researcher analysis
Threats:
Improper Analysis
Insufficient power
Inaccurate Effect Size Conclusions
research reliability
Determined through Replication Studies
To further prove findings, these may be done by yourself or fellow colleagues
To challenge your findings, these may be done by other researchers