Exam 3 Flashcards
(127 cards)
Criminal Law
Defines the limitations of the relationship between an individual and society.
An act so unacceptable that society is offended by it
Intent to harm or knowledge that the law is being violated.
Example- filling controlled substance without a prescription
Who brings upon law suits in criminal laws?
Lawsuits are brought by society through a district attorney or US attorney.
Can be charged with a crime if there is a statute prohibiting the conduct.
Possible sanctions- fine and/or prison sentence
Purpose- to deter an undesirable activity, punish and/or rehabilitate the wrong-doer
Civil Law
Pertains to the relationship among individuals in society
Government is NOT a party in a civil suit
2 major subdivisions of civil law
Contract law- duties that individuals have because they entered into an agreement
Tort law- duties created by law, NOT the parties themselves
Lawsuit is brought by one private party who sues the other party alleging an injury.
Purpose- to compensate the injured party for damages caused by the wrongdoer and deter undesirable activity
Administrative Law
Pertains to the relationship between government and a regulated profession, trade, or industry
Board of pharmacy may discipline licensees and registrants for violations of both federal and state laws governing the legal distribution of drugs.
Possible sanctions- warnings, fines, license suspension/revocation, probation
Purpose- to deter an undesirable activity, punish and/or rehabilitate the wrong-doer.
A wrongful act may subject someone to:
Criminal action
Civil action
Administrative action
Any combo of the 3
Tort
A civil wrong or wrongful act, whether intentional or accidental, from which injury occurs to another. Torts include all negligence cases as well as intentional wrongs which result in harm
Malpractice
Negligence performed by a professional
Tort law
Purposes of malpractice law
Deterrence
Compensate them to make them “whole”
4 elements of a malpractice suit
- ) Duty owed
- ) Breach of duty
- ) Causation
- ) Damages
In a malpractice suit, the plaintiff must prove
All 4 have been breached
Duty owed, breach of duty, causation, damages
In a malpractice action, the defendant must prove
Just one was not breached.
Comparative negligence- pt noticed wrong med and took anyway
Statute of limitations- about 1 year
Duty
To act as a reasonably prudent pharmacist would in a particular situation or to meet a general standard of care (plaintiff’s lawyer would introduce “expert witnesses”)
Breach (of duty)
failure to meet the standard of care (or act as a reasonably prudent pharmacist) or fulfill duties owed to patients
Cause
Both actual cause and proximate (legal) cause
Generally to be proximate cause it must be foreseeable and without certain types of intervening causes or factors
Proximate cause
If a defendant is to be liable for the harm, each of the links must be foreseeable to the defendant
Patient continuously receives early refills of amitriptyline. Patient is stockpiling and not taking daily as prescribed. Patient decides to take ~60 tablets to commit suicide and succeeds. Is the dispensing pharmacist liable?
No, this would not be foreseeable by a prudent pharmacist
Damages
Normally harm or damage cannot be undone but courts will try to make the aggrieved party “whole” or in other words put them in a comparable situation to if they had not been harmed.
Pay for loss of work/earning potential, pain and suffering, medical expenses
Very rarely do courts consider awarding punitive damages
Factors to consider- repeated behavior, likely to cause serious harm, careless indifference, personal gain, and cover-up
Vicarious liability
Pharmacists are generally liable for mistakes made by supervised technicians. Employers are generally liable for mistakes made by employees, including pharmacists
Malpractice insurance
Often not covered if you willfully violate a statute
Fairly inexpensive to get independent individual coverage
If only covered by employer, conflicts of interest can be a problem; also not covered if an issue arises outside of the workplace
Pharmacist Mary managed Compoundit Pharmacy and employed an intern, Jim, who impressed her with his intelligence and maturity. Mary never needed to show Jim how to do anything more than once. One day Mary showed Jim how to compound a prescription for a topical product for a facial skin disorder. A few weeks later the patient requested a refill, and Mary told Jim to prepare it while she
tended to other business. After Jim compounded the drug, he asked Mary if she would check it. Mary looked at the label and told Jim it was fine. A couple of days later the patient called saying that his skin was burning up. Mary told him to go to the emergency room immediately. The hospital determined that the compound contained 46% active ingredient as opposed to the required 0.46% and that the error caused the patient to suffer 3rd degree burns and permanent facial scarring. The patient sued Jim, Mary and Compoundit.
Explain why compoundit might be liable
Vicarious liability
Pharmacist Sue worked as a relief pharmacist at Philmore Pharmacy and
dispensed two prescriptions for a patient, Ralph. One prescription was a refill for digoxin and the other was a new prescription for erythromycin. Sue was very busy and inadvertently switched the labels on the vials. Ralph is legally blind and normally his daughter serves as his caregiver and picks up his prescriptions. That day, however, she was out of town and would be for the whole week, and Ralph’s son assumed the role of caregiver. The son picked up the prescriptions and administered them to Ralph as directed on the labels:
Digoxin four times daily
Erythromycin once daily
After a few days, Ralph suffered digitalis toxicity and his bacterial infection worsened. He was hospitalized and later sued Sue and Philmore Pharmacy.
Would punitive damages be warranted?
Explain how the defense of comparative negligence could be used in this case.
Would it be a good defense in this situation?
Punitive damages- no, cant prove intention
Comparative negligence would not be a good defense in this case. You have to accept people as they are and this patient was at a higher risk of harm.
How does Ohio define “compounding”?
The preparation, mixing, assembling, packaging, and labeling of one or more drugs, including the combining, mixing, diluting, pooling, reconstitution, repackaging, or otherwise altering of a drug or bulk drug substance
What is not included in compounding?
Adding flavoring to a conventionally manufactured drug product
Preparing conventionally manufactured drug products according to directions (Abx). Pharmacist must perform final check.