Exam 3 Flashcards

(44 cards)

1
Q

Can use however much reasonable appears necessary

A

non-deadly force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Only to prevent or end a dangerous felony involving risk to human life

A

Deadly force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Police encouraged or had defendant commit crime though they would not have done it themselves

A

Entrapment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Defendants predisposition to commit the crime.
The question goes to the?

A

Subjective Standard
Jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Focus is on law enforcement officers activity.
Question goes to?

A

Objective Standard
Judge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

All evidence illegally obtained directly or indirectly must be excluded.

A

Exclusionary rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Weeks v. US, Silver Platter Problem, and Mapp v. Ohio are all examples of what

A

Exclusionary rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Arguments for the exclusionary rule are what

A

Judicial integrity and deterrent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Arguments against the exclusionary rule are what

A

States rights and “large cost”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What four places does the exclusionary rule not apply

A

Before trial proceedings, After trial, Civil cases, Admin agency hearings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Would have discovered the evidence regardless of the illegal conduct

A

Inevitable Discovery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Got evidence from an independent, untainted source not connected to the illegal activity

A

Independent Source

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How many exceptions/limits to the exclusionary rule are there

A

9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ill gotten evidence cannot be used to determine guilt or innocence but can be used to impeach the defendants credibility

A

Impeachment exception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If state provides defendant with a hearing of an unreasonable search and seizure claim they cannot raise exclusionary questions again according to what

A

Post-Conviction Federal Habeas Corpus Proceeding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

If person acting independently of police direction, violates a persons fourth or fifth amendments rights, the court will not exclude the private party’s evidence

A

Private Party Searches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Exclusionary rule does not apply where police act on an objectively reasonable belief that their conduct is not violating a defendants rights

A

Good faith exception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Us v. Leon is a case about

A

Good faith Exception

19
Q

Search does not violate the constitution but only violates the internal working rules of an agency

A

Agency Rule/ State law exception

20
Q

Fourth amendment provides that no warrant, search, or arrest shall be issued unless there is a what

A

Probable Cause

21
Q

What are the two prongs in the Aguilar/Spinelli test

A

Credibility/Reliability prong and Basis of knowledge prong

22
Q

Totality of the circumstances test is what test

23
Q

all searches and seizures should be reasonable

A

Reasonableness clause

24
Q

Explains how to get a valid warrant

A

Requirements Clause

25
Taking a person into custody against his or her will
Arrest
26
Any government intrusion upon a persons reasonable and justifiable expectation of privacy
Search
27
An exercise of control by the government over a person or thing
Seizure
28
What are the elements of a formal arrest
officer intends to arrest, comes from real or presumed authority, actual or constructive seizure of the person, and communication by the officer that the person is under arrest
29
What can turn a detention into an arrest
Length of seizure, intensity of the intrusion, movement of the suspect, and location of the seizure
30
Police have the authority to detain a person briefly for questioning even without probably cause to believe that the person committed a crime
Stop and Frisk
31
What are the three valid factors of a stop and frisk
Observe unusual conduct, leading to a reasonable suspicion that criminal activity may be a foot, and the officers ability to point to specific and articulable facts to justify that suspicion
32
Less than probable cause, but more than mere/vague suspicion
Reasonable suspicion
33
An investigatory stop must be temporary and no longer than necessary to satisfy or dispel suspicions
Scope and Duration
34
May pat down a persons outer clothing for weapons, provided the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous
Frisk
35
Written order, based on probably cause, issued by a magistrate telling officers to arrest a particular person
Arrest warrant
36
Written order telling the person to appear in court at a stated day and time
Summons
37
In MN, the person must be brought before the magistrate within how many hours?
36 hours
38
Routine searches by government agents at an international border or its equivalent
Border searches
39
Can stop vehicles and question occupants if the officer has reasonable suspicion that said vehicle contains an illegal immigrant
Roving Patrols
40
Can stop vehicles and question occupants with a reasonable suspicion
Permanent checkpoints
41
Government inspectors must have a warrant to search private residences and commercial buildings
Administrative Searches
42
Before beginning any search, police must have probably cause to believe that auto contains fruits, instrumentalities, or evidence of a crime or contraband
Probably cause requirement
43
What are the four key questions raised by Miranda
Were the warnings given? Is the defendant in custody? Were the defendants statements made in response to interrogation? Can the confession be used for impeachment purposes
44
Getting an inmate to do their questioning for them
Jailhouse informers