Exam 3 Flashcards

(96 cards)

1
Q

Importance of Studying Peer Relationships

A

Interaction Time
- more peer interaction in adolescence

Long-Term Outcomes
- interactions in youth can cause harm later (ex: bad experience causes later anxiety)

Cognitive Changes
- feel that they are being watched/lack of awareness, imaginary audience/personal fable

Judith Rich Harris
- parents vs. peers: peers are more influential in adolescence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Methods of Studying Friendship

A
  • Friendship Nomination
  • Cliques
  • Observe Interactions
  • Quantity vs. Quality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Friendship Nomination

A

Limits on Number
- can only nominate top x number of friends

Reciprocated or Not
- does the person who is nominated reciprocate the nomination or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cliques

A
  • Nomination clusters/groups
  • Group is connected/friends
  • Not everyone is equally close
  • Often features several dyads
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Observe Interactions

A
  • Bring dyad into lad
  • Give task: discuss conflict, talk, etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Quantity vs. Quality

A

Number of friends vs. quality of friendships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Forms of Friendship Quality

A

Companionship
- do things/spend time together

Conflict
- less prevalent in high quality relationships

Help/Aid
- helping physically/in person (example: helping a friend move)

Security
- helping emotionally/offering support (example: helping friend through a breakup)

Closeness
- emotional bond, wanting/feeling closeness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Chumships (Harry Stack Sullivan)

A
  • Real friendships are critical for development in childhood
  • Intimacy such as connection, venting, etc. are necessary
  • Intimacy grows with age
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Factors that Influence Formation of Adolescent Friendships

A

Homophily
- similar interests, attitudes, etc.

Proximity
- typically must live close
- closer proximity = higher quality friendship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Levels of Friendship

A

Best
- highest level of intimacy and emotional closeness

Close
- hang out + intimacy
- less than best friend but still high

Acquaintance
- lowest level of intimacy/closeness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Gender Differences in Adolescent Friendships

A

Difference in Time Together
- boys: activity based
- girls: dyads spend time together and converse

Mixed-Sex Groups
- appears in late adolescence
- typically no girl/boy dyads

Other-Sex Friendships
- not very common

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Gender Differences in Friendship in Traditional Cultures

A

Traditional Cultures
- boys: encouraged to have friends and socialize
- girls: given rules and restrictions surrounding friendships and socialization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Effect of Friendships on Adolescents’ Lives and Development

A

Selection vs. Socialization
- people tend to makes friends with similar people, homophily increases with time
- prior to friendship: very similar
- after friendship: get even closer and more similar

Contagion Effects
- Cliques engage in risk behavior together

Emotional Satisfaction
- higher quality friendships lead to higher emotional satisfaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Forms of Friendship Support

A

Informational
- high in security (emotional support)

Instrumental
- being there (physical support)

Companionship
- doing something for 1st time, need for support

Esteem
- encouragement, you can/should do something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Friendship Dissolution

A

No longer friends @ same level (can be not mutual) due to proximity, gradual change, etc.

Break of trust
- causes big impact, violation of friendship rules

Communicatiom
- lack of talking

Intimacy
- not discussing deep, personal things can cause dissolution

Time Together
- learn that they are different people
- could also be due to a huge violation during time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Antipathetic Relationships

A

Mutual Antipathies
- two people who dislike each other

Enemies
- dislike —> hatred/malice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Prevalence of Antipathetic Relationships

A
  • Typically people only have one antipathetic relationship
  • Every person has experienced it at least once
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

People Who Adolescents Have Antipathetic Relationships With

A
  • Typically an ex-friend
  • Someone with an incompatible personality/relationship
  • People they are jealous of
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

“Youth Culture”

A
  • Looks at the adolescent period as its own separate culture
  • Adolescents as a group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

“Styles” of Youth Culture

A

Change through history
- Image
- Demeanor
- Argot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Image

A
  • Physical Appearance Aspects
  • Clothing
  • ex: changes from 40s-70s-90s
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Demeanor

A
  • Form of gesturing, walking, and interacting
  • Dancing
  • How they spend time with friends
  • Changes in decades
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Argot

A
  • “Slang” or Language
  • How they talk to each other
  • Pop culture nuances within language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Why May Youth Culture Exist?

A
  • Allows them to display independence from culture of adults
  • Identity development part: figuring out who they are
  • Mixed messages they receive because of their age
  • Creating own norms separates from kids, moves into adulthood
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Peer Nomination
- Who gets the most “votes” - Who's the MOST popular - List kids who are most popular vs. least popular - Can be in group with people you don’t know - Students get a code number, participants write numbers down to nominate the student
26
How is Peer Nomination Used in Researching Peer Culture
Create Score - “Most Liked” - “Least Liked”: final score of how well-liked they are - Mean: “Fights”, “Teases”, “Bullies” create mean score for aggression Possibly Create Groups - 20 or higher: “popular” - -20 or lower: “unpopular”
27
Crowds
- Can be created by self-reported data - Large groups of people who identify in similar way despite not knowing each other - Not 5 people unlike cliques, more like 30-200 - Number of crowds get larger as age increases Groups such as: - Jocks - Brains - Deviants - Etc.
28
Crowd Makeups of Early Adolescence
Very few distinguishable crowds as they are just starting to develop their identity - Cool Kids - Normals - Dorks
29
Crowd Makeups of Late Adolescence
- Many, many different types of crowds - More likely to be in moratorium phase of finding who they are - New crowds like goths, deviants, peppies, druggies, etc.
30
History of Research on Popularity
Popularity = Liked - View in 1980’s Psychologists vs. Sociologists - Psychologists: believe popularity is tied to how well-liked you are - Sociologists: let adolescents define construct thru conversations about popularity and like-ability, more ethnography studies, found popular kids aren't well liked, visibility aspect Sociometric vs. Perceived - Sociometric: how well-liked are you, higher means you are well-liked - Perceived: peer-defined status; increased means you aren’t well-liked, but popular
31
Popularity
- Visibility: people know who they are and know things about them even w/o friendship - Dominance: more power than others - Social status: seen to have higher status than others - Commodity: invisible and limited, not everyone can have it or it wouldn’t exist in same way - True Status Construct - Perceived
32
Social Preference
- Well-liked, not DISliked: many people like you and very few dislike you - Controversial Status - Dispositional Trait: everyone can theoretically have it, doesn’t need to be competed over - Sociometric
33
Sociometric Status Categories
Participants split up based on nominations of liked and disliked Popular - Large # of liked and little to no disliked nominations Rejected - Opposite of popular, large # of disliked nominations and few to no liked nominations Neglected - Received few nominations Controversial - Received large # of liked and disliked nomination Average - Everyone else
34
Characteristics of Sociometric Status Categories
Popular - Get along well with others - Good social skills - Many friends Rejected - Aggressive: impulsive, disruptive, aggressive - Non Aggressive: socially awkward, odd behavior/language - Stick out in a negative way Neglected - Wallflowers: shy, inhibited, introverts
35
Stability of Individuals in Sociometric Status Categories
Rejected - Very stable status, tend to stay in category through development even if they aren’t that person anymore Neglected - Unstable, can come out of shell and get noticed which leads to change in category
36
Social Preference Continum
- Most Liked - Least Liked - Score could be “liked” or “disliked” somewhere between high and low
37
Social Impact
- Most Liked + Least Liked - Visibility, people know who they are but may either like or dislike them
38
Popularity
- Most Popular - Least Popular - Rare, but can create three categories: popular, average, and unpopular
39
Characteristics of Popular vs. Unpopular Individuals
Popular - physically attractive, wealthy/wealth makers, athletes - Stylish clothes + cool things Unpopular - Similar to nonaggressive rejected students - Visible due to being weird/odd
40
Stability of Popularity vs. Stability of Social Preference
- Popularity is more stable than social preference - Girls: popularity is more stable than for boys - Boys: social preference is more stable than for girls
41
Development Change in Relationship Between Popularity and Social Preference
Are the same people who are popular well-liked? - Large overlap in elementary: liked=popular - Less overlap in middle school: distinction between popularity/social preference begins, some people are popular and liked and some are disliked - Even less in high school: rare for popular youth to be well-liked
42
Gender Difference in Relationship Between Popularity and Social Preference
Boys - Popular & Well-Liked - Become uncorrelated Girls - Popular & Disliked - Become negatively correlated - Popular Girls —> Controversial Status: many like them ands many dislike them
43
Status-Aggression Link
Bi-Directional Effect - Increased popularity leads to increased aggression - Increased aggression leads to increased popularity - Especially for Social Aggression Why? - Aggression can be used to maintain status - Stops those who threaten status from gaining it - Can obtain status by demeaning others
44
Other Links Found to Popular Individuals
Risk-Taking - Substance Use: use “normal” substances more often like weed and alcohol, not illicit drugs like coke or molly - Sexual Behavior: more sexual partners, have sex earlier than peers which lowers chance of using contraceptive Academics - Effect of also being well-liked - Lower GPA’s and higher truancy rates - Buffered if high in social preference
45
Difference in Peer Status in Other Types of Schools
“Military” Academy - Status = Class/Rank: as you get older, you get more privilege and power over those below you - In-Class/Rank Unity: unity of status that exists - Cross-Class Teams: have various competitions - Similar to Harry Potter Small Town School - Sports & Looks: emphasized even more than in urban schools - Parents Reputation: people know each other better so parents job/place in community could positively/negatively impact reputation of child - Cross-Status Interaction: more likely to occur, friendships/dating between those who are popular and just average Church Schools - Not that different: most similar to large public - Dress: uniform standards, can include things such as in class solidarity (certain grade gets a specific jacket) or popular kids slightly tweaking uniforms (rolled up skirts + accessories)
46
Difference in Peer Status in Other Regions of the World
Canada/European Countries - Similar to U.S. - Popular kids are aggressive, come from wealth, and are typically disliked China/Japan - Academics —> Popularity: excelling academically=popular, peer group looks down on those who do poorly in school - Other similarities to US, but academic takes cake Africa/South America - Language lacks similar term - Well-known or well-liked
47
Long-Term Effects of Adolescent Popularity
After High School - Risk Behaviors: drinking and drug use aren’t isolated to high school, “popular” adolescents continue to use substances more than other individuals - Workplace Harassment: popular individuals are more likely to engage in aggression and harassment at work when they get older
48
Issues with Researching and Findings of Popularity in Emerging Adulthood
Hard to Measure - Where do you do nominations? A dorm? Smaller schools? - Creates difficult - Simply must ask college kids who popular kids are Does it Exist? - Some say no, popularity is instead a high school thing and adolescent subcultures don’t exist - Celebrity Status: athletes are popular - Fraternities/Sororities: some say popularity only exists in there, or that people who are in there are the popular ones
49
Peer Status Parenting Implication
Should I be worried if my adolescent is popular? - No clear cut answer, maybe so be on the lookout - Maybe, but less so if they are also well-liked - Difficult to know if your child is well-liked which makes it hard to know if you should worry
50
Aggression
Intentionally harming someone in some way - depends on context
51
Overt Aggression
- Easy to identify aggressor/victim - Physical: hitting, kicking, pushing, any physical harm - Verbal: name-calling to face, face-to-face insults
52
Relational Aggression
Indirect Aggression - shielding aggressor identity but victim is known - not to face Social Aggression - harming someone’s social life (relationship, status, etc.) Emergence of Relational Aggression - boys: aggressive - girls: cause harm to relationships/reputation Media Influences - Heathers, Mean Girls
53
How is Aggression Measured
- Peer Nomination - Teacher-Reports - Self-Reports
54
Peer Nomination
Overt Aggression (physical) - Initiates/gets into physical fights - Hit, shove, or push peers - Dominate or bully people Relational Aggression - Excluding others purposefully - Spreading gossip/rumors with malicious intent - Ignore others to get their way
55
Teacher-Reports
- Report bullying/fights - Mirrors peer-reports - Not accurate when it comes to relational aggression, peer-reports are better
56
Self-Reports
- Less likely to be honest - Relational Aggression: Romantic Relationships (threaten a breakup) - Victimization: are you a victim/target
57
Gender Differences of Aggressive Behavior
Boys - boys use overt aggression more than girls - also use relational aggression Girls - girls don’t always use more relational aggression than guys, often its equal levels - less overt aggression and more relational aggression
58
What Causes Gender Differences of Aggressive Behavior
Reinforcements from society such as: - “boys will be boys” - girls are “nice”
59
Relationship Between Overt Aggression and Social Preference
- As age increases, aggression causes you to be disliked - Not much gender difference
60
Relationship Between Relational Aggression and Social Preference
- Weak relationship between popularity and relational aggression - Not much gender difference
61
Relationship Between Overt Aggression and Friendships
Less/Lower Quality Friendships - more conflict, less support Targets = Non-Friends - people don’t want to befriend a “mean” person which reduces number of friends
62
Relationship Between Relational Aggression and Friendships
Popular - increased quality friendships - social power often goes in hand with relational aggression - homophily Disliked - lower quality friendships - less effective use of relational aggression - skill issue
63
Difference Between Aggression and Bullying
Aggression - random Bullying - targeted/selective - within aggression
64
Bully
- Always aggressor, never target - Rejected + aggressive
65
Bully-Victim
- Aggressor and target
66
Victim
- Always target, never aggressor - Rejected + nonaggressive - Less friends
67
Cyberbullying
Repetitive targeting on internet, more relational aggression than overt
68
Profiles of Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying
- Same people in roles as traditional bullying - Effects are the same but the bully-victims are a different group
69
Efficacy of Anti-Bullying Programs
- Not a huge success, some rate good but not perfect - Effectiveness of program depends on the school and its environment - If a school + program have matching perspectives, the program is more effective
70
Aggression and Bullying Policy Implication
Cyberbullying Laws - Schools often have a say when it comes to physical bullying, but cyberbullying is out of schools hands and is often rather handled by the state - NV: legal issue - CA: school issue
71
Forms of Problem Behavior
- Externalizing - Internalizing - Risky Behavior - Antisocial Behavior
72
Externalizing
- Outward problem behaviors - Actively doing something - Undercontrolled: relaxed parenting, few rules/restrictions
73
Internalizing
- Emotional/chronic or momentary - Mental health related - Overcontrolled: too much parental pressure and involvement
74
Risky Behavior
- Engaging in behavior, higher risk for negative problem - Ex: Substance Use: if you drink, higher risk for drinking and driving
75
Antisocial Behavior
- Against societal norms in a violent way - Ex: Violence: vandalizing, harming very violently
76
Brain Development and Adolescent Risk Behavior
Immature Prefrontal Lobes: underdeveloped decision making - Decision Making vs. Emotional Centers - 25 is when both are fully developed - Risk behavior decreases in 20s
77
Reason for Adolescent Engagement in Risk Driving Behavior
Experience - Lack ability + knowledge to properly respond to situations Cognitive Factors - Personal fable: nothing bad happens to me Personality Factors - High sensation/thrill seeking - Low empathy Link to Mortality Rate - Auto fatalities have a strong link to danger - More risk means more danger
78
Development Pattern of Substance Use
Alcohol Use During HS - Increased use by non-college bound - Less use by college bound Alcohol Use After HS - Less use by non-college bound - Increased use by college bound Non-College: link between school failure + alcohol use
79
Different Adolescent Profiles of Substance Use
Experimental Use - Curiosity, what is ____ like? Social Use - Not when alone but with others Medicinal Use - Self-medicate - Using substances to cope w/ problems Addictive Use - Withdrawal (physical/mental) w/o substances
80
Overall Factors Related to Adolescent Substance Use
Age - Using before 14 causes heightened risk for addictive use Low Academic Achievement - Bidirectional link to substance use Lack of Parental Closeness - Lack of closeness (not friendship) increases risk Unstructured Socializing - Lack of organization and plans increases risk
81
Contextual Factors Related to Adolescent Substance Use
- Environmental systems impact behavior - Urban: often engage with illegal substance like meth - Rural: engage with normal substances like weed and tobacco - Suburban: in middle, engages with both
82
Peer Factors Related to Adolescent Substance Use
Friends vs. Peers - Peer pressure comes from friends more than peers Popularity - Increased risk for substance use - Not dependent
83
Policies vs. Programs
- Policies: enacted to decrease behavior - Programs: tools/knowledge to prevent substance use
84
Public Health Substance Use Policies
- Care about health of all impacted - Want decreased use - e.g. restrict sales hours
85
Harm Reduction Substance Use Policies
- Don’t care about quantity of use, just wan’t decreased harm - Laws on driving and B.A.C. leads to decreased harm
86
Efficacy of School-Based Substance Use Prevention Programs
Marketed Programs - Marketing w/o data - ex: D.A.R.E Evidence-Based Programs - Uses data and works to inform - Not scary and intimidating - Teaches refusal skills
87
Moffit’s Forms of Deliquency
- Life-Course Persistent - Adolescent Limited
88
Life-Course Persistent Antisocial Behavior
- Behavior is bad and gets worse through life - Can be due to neurological problems and high risk environments
89
Adolescent Limited Antisocial Behavior
- No high risk environment - Externalizing problems
90
Dishion Deviant Talk Study
Method - Measures talk of rule breaking and the depth/time of convo - Example: long convo about stealing, how it was done, etc. Results - Higher in boys than girls - Higher in persistently antisocial individuals compared to normative
91
Effects of Early Intervention Programs
Early Iatrogenic Effects are opposite of what you want Peer Contagion: someone did this, learn how to do it + outdo them Other reasons: ex. A lot of arrests
92
Characteristics of Multisystematic Approach to Delinquency Prevention
Prevented by family, school, community, etc.
93
Resiliency
Ability to avoid risk
94
Protective Factors Toward Risk/Problematic Behaviors
Intelligence - Higher intelligence buffers potential for risk Adult Relationship - Adult mentor helps to avoid risk School Climate - “Parenting style” of school - Support/rules lead to decreased risk Religious Effects - Increased practice/faith can help decrease risk - Offers support
95
Deviance Policy Implication #1
Graduate Driver Licensing - Drivers Ed: certain restrictions can be bypassed if completed - Driving Curfews: can drive til 9 when 17, increases when 18 - Zero Tolerance: warning/citations, substance/alcohol use causes instance loss of license
96
Deviance Policy Implication #2
National Minimum Drinking Age Act - Public Health Policy as it decreases access - Ties some Federal Funds to change - Less Traffic Fatalities for those under 20 - Didn’t change quantity of drinking