Exam 3 Flashcards

(61 cards)

1
Q

Kinship

A

kin selection models of social behavior; evolution of the family unit; parent/offspring conflict and sibling rivalry; how and why animals recognize kin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Kin selection

A

favors altruistic behavior; inclusive fitness refer to an individual’s total fitness based on the number of offspring it has (direct) and contribution made to the reproductive success of its genetic relatives (indirect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Alarm calls

A

Alarm calls emitted when predator is spotted Females more likely than males to emit calls Females live with female relatives; adult males emigrate from family group to find mates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Coefficient of Relatedness

A

Relatedness: probability that 2 individuals share an allele (variation of a gene) due to recent common ancestry Value of r ranges from 0 (unrelated) to 1 (clone/identical twin) One-half of alleles shared (r = 0.5): offspring-parent, siblings One-quarter of alleles shared (r = 0.25): offspring grandparent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hamilton’s Rule

A

Altruism is favored when r x b > c r= relatedness b=benefit in repro terms to related individual c = cost in repro terms to the altruist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Bank Swallows

A

Kinship; mother must remember location of nest and learn to recognize offspring’s voices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Grey-Crowned Babblers

A

Helpers increase reproductive success of their genetic kin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Emlen’s Evolutionary Theory of Family

A

tests specific predictions about formation, stability, and social dynamics of biological families; -inclusive fitness -ecological constraints: dispersal options for mature -offspring; reproductive skew: how reproduction is portioned among individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Prediction 1

A

Family groupings will be unstable, disintegrating when reproductive opportunities materialize elsewhere Superb fairy wren: breeding pairs are helped by nonbreeding male offspring (food, protection); female offspring emigrate from natal territory and do not help parents Experimental approach: Create new, unoccupied territories and see whether mature offspring leave natal area for them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Prediction 2

A

Families that control high-quality resources will be more stable than those with lower-quality resources. Some resource-rich areas will support dynasties in which one genetic lineage continuously occupies the same area over many successive generations. Offspring in high-resource areas are likely to be reluctant to leave Acorn woodpeckers: Critical resource is number of storage holes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Prediction 4

A

Assistance in rearing offspring (cooperative breeding) will be expressed to the greatest extent between those family members that are the closest genetic relatives. According to inclusive fitness theory, individuals will help closest genetic kin over distantly related kin White-fronted bee-eaters: Helpers most likely to help genetic kin and dispense all of their aid to that individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Parent-offspring conflict

A

How much aid should a parent give offspring? How much energy available? How many future offspring? Parent needs to balance investment of resources to maximize number of offspring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Sibling Rivalry

A

Conflict arises when resources become limited Example: Egrets Eggs are laid at different times, hatch at different times Chicks can differ in age by multiple days (size difference) Larger chicks can compete better for food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Kin Recognition

A

Use of ‘vocal signatures’ to recognize chicks (Emperor & King penguins) Use of rendezvous site in combination with vocal cues to find chicks (Macaroni, Adelie)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Template Matching in Spadefoot Toads

A

2 different juvenile ‘morphs’ or forms: herbivore carnivore Can these tadpoles recognize kin? 1)  Do they prefer to associate with kin or non-kin? 2)  Do they prefer to eat kin or non-kin?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cuckoos

A

Cowbirds and cuckoos lay eggs in other birds’ nests, host parents feed the intruders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Cooperation

A

Outcome of 2 or more individuals interacting such that they receive a net benefit from their interactions even though there are costs Cooperating means behaving in a way that makes the expected benefits possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Cooperation in Elephants

A

First task: Elephants trained to pull a rope attached to a table to get a bowl of food (solo task) Second task: Elephants needed to work together to pull 2 ropes to get a food reward 1) Elephants released at the same time (working together could be coincidental) 2) Elephant release staggered (working together requires waiting, supports coordination) Third task: Elephants released at the same time but one rope is made inaccessible (working together not possible, no coordination)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Cooperation in Rodrigues Fruit Bats

A

Unrelated female ‘helper’ assisted female with difficult birth Demonstrated birthing posture (feet down) Groomed mother during birthing Licked newborn Assisted with positioning pup for nursing Assistance may be related to bonds built through roosting proximity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Cooperation in Primates

A

Health benefit: removal of parasites Social benefit: Tension reduction (hormone levels are affected such that aggression is reducted) Resource that can be exchanged for food, assistance with an aggressor/predator May represent an exchange-based system of cooperation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

4 Paths to cooperation

A

kin selection reciprocity byproduct mutualism group selection (controversial)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Reciprocity

A

•  Reciprocal altruism: exchanging acts of cooperative and altruistic behavior •  Why would natural selection favor this type of behavior? •  The cost of one individual helping another is offset by the recipient reciprocating by helping the helper in the future. •  Works better in social groups where individuals encounter each other more frequently and are able to recognize each other Examples: 1) Predator inspection in guppies 2) Food-sharing in vampire bats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Tit-for-Tat Strategy

A

Reciprocity-based strategy of behavior 1)  Individual cooperates in first encounter with a partner 2)  Then copies partner’s response (cooperate vs. ‘cheating’/ not cooperate) 3)  ‘Forgives’ cheating if partner is currently cooperating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Predator Inspection: Guppies

A

Guppies appear to cooperate in this risky behavior Cooperating = inspecting together ‘Cheating’/not cooperating = lagging behind or not inspecting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Food Sharing: Vampire Bats
Groups are mostly female, low coefficient of relatedness (not very genetically related) Frequent blood meals critical for survival Females will regurgitate blood meal to feed group members that have not fed recently Hungry bat will be more likely to get a shared meal of she has fed the satiated bat sometime in the past
26
Byproduct Mutualism
•  Cooperation is a ‘byproduct’ of a situation in which an individual would suffer a cost by not cooperating •  Differs from reciprocity: 1)  No temptation to ‘cheat’ or not cooperate 2)  Past behavior is not relevant (no scorekeeping) because cooperating is in the best interest of all parties Examples: 1)  Female yuhina jays & harsh environments 2)  House sparrows & large food source
27
Coalitions
Two or more individuals that cooperate to act against another individual or group Commonly involves intervening in an aggressive interaction with one individual Long-lasting coalitions are called alliances
28
Interspecific Mutualism
Cooperation between 2 different species •  Imperial blue butterfly and Iridomyrmex ants have a mutualistic relationship •  Butterfly larvae and pupae cannot survive without ants •  Ants gain significant nutrition from nectar produced by larvae and pupae
29
Foraging Behavior
searching for and consuming food includes agriculture, hunting
30
Agriculture
Agriculture can be considered a form of symbiosis (close, long-term interaction between 2 species) •  Agriculture-practicing animals: 1)  Humans 2)  Bark beetles 3)  Termites 4)  Ants
31
Ant Foraging: Fungus-Growing
Hypothesis: evolution of complex ant-fungus relationship includes protection of fungus from destruction •  Supporting evidence: 1) At least 20 species of fungus-growing ants have Streptomyces bacteria, which produces antibiotics 2) Bacteria passed from parent to offspring 3) Only female reproductive ants ‘cultivate’ fungus gardens and carry bacteria 4) Bacteria’s antibiotics kill only specific parasites of the fungus
32
Leafcutter Ants
Fungal garden chambers: plant material incorporated into fungal mats Detritus chambers: storage of waste materials
33
Optimal Foraging Theory
refers to a type of mathematically-based models used to predict different aspects of foraging behavior
34
Optimal Foraging: What to eat? (Optimal Prey Choice Model)
Supported by an early laboratory experiment by Krebs (1978) •  Great tit foraging studied using a conveyor belt presenting 2 different-sized pieces of mealworms for birds to choose (large = most profitable, small = least profitable) •  Encounter rate, energy content, and handling time required were measured and controlled •  Model accurately predicted when birds would take more profitable prey vs. both prey types \*Encounter rate of most profitable (and NOT least profitable) that determines whether least profitable prey chosen
35
Optimal Foraging: How long to stay in a given food patch? (Marginal value Theorem)
Patch = clump of food that can be depleted (eaten) by a forager •  Once feeding in a patch starts, rate of feeding slows because food is disappearing •  Other less depleted patches available but will require a travel cost (energy, time, predation risk) Key question addressed by this model: How long should an animal forage in a patch it is depleting before moving on to the next patch?
36
Optimal Foraging: Effects of nutritional requirements of foraging? (Linear Programming Model)
Many animals have specific nutritional needs such as zinc and sodium; foraging for these nutrients can be costly Example: Moose require sodium (found in aquatic but not terrestrial plants) Model accounted for: 1) Minimum daily food requirement 2) Speed of digestion 3) Energy values of aquatic & terrestrial plants 4) Sodium constraint \*Model accurately predicted that a moose needs to spend 18% of its summer foraging time on aquatic plants to meet yearly sodium needs
37
Optimal Foraging: Effects of variance in food supply on food choice? (risk-sensitive optimal foraging model)
Risk = variability in prey/food availability •  Hunger state of an animal influences preferences for risktaking Satiated animal: Risk-averse = animal prefers less variance Starving animal: Risk-prone = animal prefers variance Hungry but not starving/satiated: Risk-insensitive = animal is indifferent
38
Caching and Hoarding
Caching/hoarding = saving food for later consumption; sooner as in the case of an animal carcass or later (e.g. months) Hoarding 1)  Scatter – large number of caches of food (squirrels, birds) 2)  Larder – usually one large cache of food kept in nest (hamsters)
39
Hippocampus in Birds
Recall: hippocampus (yellow circle) is important for spatial learning in mammals In birds, hippocampus (blue bracket) is associated with food retrieval
40
Hippocampus Size & Caching Activity Relate in Birds
•  Relationship between food-storing behavior and hippocampal volume studied in 7 bird species with different food-storing behaviors •  Species that rarely store food: alpine chough (A) and jackdaw (B) •  Species that show moderate levels of food storage: rook and crow (C), red-billed blue magpie (D) and magpie (E) •  Species that shows high levels of food storage: European jay (F) MORE
41
European Jay
Largest relative hippocampal volume compared to other birds •  Food-storage/retrieval is very important to this species •  Stores 6,000 to 11,000 seeds and remembers locations for 9 months
42
Caching within a Single Species
Hypothesis: Birds from food-poor areas should be better at caching and retrieval and have a larger hippocampus compared to birds from food-rich areas Experiment: Black-capped chickadees captured from 2 separate locations and allowed to cache & retrieve seeds 1) Alaska – food-poor 2) Colorado – food-rich Results: Compared to Colorado birds, Alaskan birds 1)  Cached more seeds 2)  Found more of them efficiently 3)  Had larger hippocampi with more neurons
43
Foraging and Forebrain
•  Many learning-related processes involve the forebrain •  Perhaps larger forebrain size is predictive of better learning ability? •  Relative forebrain size measured as ratio of forebrain:brain stem
44
Foraging Innovation
•  Lefebrve and colleagues came up with a potential indicator of learning ability: Foraging innovation = “either the ingestion of a new food or type of the use of a new foraging technique” •  Data were gathered for 322 foraging innovations in 318 bird species from North America and the British Isles •  Frequency of innovations was plotted against relative forebrain size
45
Brian Size, Innovation & Survival
•  Is there a fitness advantage to having larger brains? •  Invasion potential = survival in a new environment •  Larger brain size à greater invasion potential •  Higher innovation frequency à greater invasion potential
46
Foraging & Planning for the Future
Can animals other than humans plan for the future? Two requirements needed to support existence of this ability: 1)  Behavior must be novel, not innate 2)  Behavior cannot be tied to current motivational state of animal but to an anticipated state in the future
47
Western Scrub Jay
4 hr trial: Bird chooses worm (worm is still fresh after 4 hrs) 124 hr trial: Bird chooses peanuts (worm is rotten after 124 hrs) Birds knew what (worm/peanut), where (side of tray), and when (how long ago food cached)!
48
Examples of Antipredator Behavior
1) Deep-sea worms: release of bioluminescent “bombs” 2) Ground squirrels: tail waving, dirt throwing
49
Luminescent Bombs of Deep-Sea Worms
•  Deep sea worms (genus Swima) release glowing green fluidfiled sacs or “bombs” to scare off predators •  “Bombs” are actually detachable gills that glow for several seconds after release •  These worms live about 2 miles down from the ocean surface
50
Snakes VS. Ground Squirrel
•  California ground squirrels and gopher snakes have been prey-predator for about 1 million years •  Antipredator behaviors include: 1)  Group mobbing, including biting & harrassment, until snake leaves 2)  Throwing dirt, pebbles, etc. 3)  Specific snake alarm calls California ground squirrels will mount similar antipredator behaviors against rattlesnakes A: Snakes are recognized as predators B: Confrontations are common C: Squirrels have defensive responses including throwing items
51
Antipredator Behavior
Two general types: 1) Avoid detection by predator 2) Predator encounter
52
Predator Avoidance Strategies
1) Blending into the environment 2) Being quiet 3) Choosing safe habitats
53
Blending into Environment
•  Commonly known as becoming camouflaged or cryptic •  Reduces likelihood of detection by predators •  This strategy of matching backgrounds is not necessarily based on behavior •  Natural selection can act to favor variants of certain traits that facilitate “blending in” Example: Coat color in oldfield mouse (also known as beach mouse) \*Mice living on the beach are lighter than mice living more inland
54
Active Camouflage
Cuttlefish and related cephalopods (octopus, squid) use 3 forms of active camouflage: 1)  Uniform: single color adopted from background 2)  Mottled: mixture of small dark and light splotches resembling background 3)  Disruptive: mixture of large dark and light resembling background
55
Being Quiet
•  Reducing sound production in response to particular predator sounds Examples: 1) Gulf toadfish: avoiding bottlenose dolphins 2) Wax moths: avoiding bats
56
Gulf Toadfish
•  Make up about 13% of bottlenose dolphin diet •  Dolphins orient towards “boat whistle” sounds made by males during the breeding season Question: Do toadfish listen for sounds of dolphin foraging and then decrease their “boat whistling”? •  Dolphin vocalizations include: 1)  High-frequency whistles used for social communication 2)  Clicks and low-frequency “pops”, used for foraging •  For toadfish, low-frequency sounds are easy to hear Experiment: •  Male toadfish captured during breeding season •  Whistling males exposed to one of the following sounds: 1)  Pops associated with dolphin foraging 2)  High-frequency whistles involved in social communication 3)  “Snapping” sounds of snapping shrimp = control sound •  Whistling activity of male toadfish measured for 5 min before, during, and after test or control sounds
57
Greater Wax Moths
•  Similar to Gulf toadfish, greater wax moths also become quiet when a predator is detected •  Wax moth predator = bat •  Bats emit echolocation calls during foraging Female moths face 2 problems: 1)  Male mating calls sound very similar to bat calls 2)  Female “wing-fanning” response attracts bats as well as males
58
Choosing Safe Habitats
Avoid predators by selecting predator-free habitats Examples: 1) Nesting site choice in parrots 2) Conservation concerns in relocating animals to new environments and new predators
59
Nesting Site Choice in Parrots
Brightsmith and colleagues compared Australian and Amazonian parrot species 1)  DNA sequences 2)  Nesting behavior: Tree cavity (TC) or other cavity (OC) nesters \*Ancestral state of nesting site choice = tree cavity \*Other cavity nesting preference evolved independently Question: What forces of natural selection drove nesting site choices from tree cavity to other cavity?
60
Co-Evolution of Predator & Prey
•  Co-evolution = changes in traits of species 1 results in changes in traits of species 2; these change feed back in turn on traits of species 1 etc. etc. •  Can result in an “arms race” such that as prey evolve behaviors to defend against predators, predators evolve behaviors that increase prey detection
61
Rabbit Antipredator Behavior
•  Rabbits are an introduced species in Australia •  Co-evolved with ferrets, cats, and foxes in Europe Exposure to scents of predators with shared evolutionary history à decreased use of scented areas Exposure to scent of native Australian predator (spotted quoll) à no decrease