Exam 3 Flashcards

(34 cards)

1
Q

two characteristics of goods

A
  1. rivalness

2. excludability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

rivalness

A

property of a good whereby one persons use diminished other peoples use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

excludability

A

property of a good whereby a person can be prevented from using it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is excludable and a rival

A

private goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is excludable and non-rival

A

club goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is rival and non-excludable

A

common resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is non-rival and non-excludable

A

public goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

externalities

A

the uncompensated impact of ones persons actions on the well-being of a bystander

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

positive externality

A

impact on bystander is beneficial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

negative externality

A

impact on bystander is adverse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

information asymmetry

A

A difference in two or more parties’ access to relevant knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

hidden actions

A

One person knows more than another about an action he or she is taking.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

hidden characteristic

A

One person knows more than another about the attributes of a good he is selling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

moral hazard

A

Tendency of a person who is imperfectly monitored to engage in dishonest or otherwise undesirable behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

agent

A

A person who is performing a task on someone else’s behalf (e.g., a worker)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

principal

A

The person for whom this action is being performed (e.g., an employer)

17
Q

the principal-agent problem

A

When the principal cannot perfectly monitor the agent’s behavior, there is a risk (“hazard”) that the agent may do something undesirable (“immoral”).

18
Q

how principals may respond to the principal-agent problem

A
  • better monitoring
  • higher wages
  • delayed payment
19
Q

command and control policies

A

regulate behavior directly

20
Q

market-based policies

A

incentives so that private decision-makers will choose to solve the problem on their own.

21
Q

corrective taxes

A

induce private decision-makers to take account the social cost that arse from negative externality

22
Q

private solutions to externalities

A
  • moral codes and social sanctions
  • charities
  • the self-interest of the relevant parties
23
Q

adverse selection

A

arises when the seller knows more than the buyer about the good being sold.

24
Q

signaling

A

actions taken by an informed party to reveal private information to an uninformed party

25
screening
actions taken by the uninformed party to induce informed party to reveal private information
26
two mechanisms to overcome asymmetric information problems
- signaling | - screening
27
political economy
applies the methods of economics to study how government works
28
the Condorcet voting paradox
the failure of majority rule to produce transitive preferences to society
29
transitivity
if A is preferred to B, and if B is preferred to C, then A should be preferred to C
30
lessons from the Condorcet paradox
- democratic preferences are not always transitive\ - the order on which things are voted can affect the result - majority voting does not always reveal what society really wants-results are typically median voter
31
arrows impossibility theorem
a mathematical result showing that, under certain assumed conditions, there is no scheme for aggregating individual preferences into a valid set of social preferences.
32
the median voter theorem
a mathematical result showing that majority rule will always pick the outcome most preferred by the median voter
33
implications of the median voter theorem
- in a two-party or two-candidate race, each party will move its position toward that median voter - minority views are not given much weight
34
behavioral economics
Subfield of economics that integrates the insights of psychology