Exam 4-Policy Flashcards
(119 cards)
Which court cases compose the exclusionary rule?
Miranda, Gideon, & Mapp
Miranda v. Arizona
people cannot be coerced into confession (Miranda rights)
Gideon v. Wainwright
right to an attorney
Mapp v. Ohio
search and seizure
Obergefell v. Hodges
legalized gay marriage
Citizens United v. FEC
giving money to a candidate is a form of free speech and therefore cannot be restricted by the government
NFIB v. Sebelius
the court case that kept Obamacare in place
DC v. Heller
legal to own a gun but cannot carry it around
Roe v. Wade
legalized abortion
Dobbs v. Jackson Health Center
overturned Roe v. Wade
Engle v. Vitale
prohibits the requirement for teacher-led prayer in school
Kitzmiller v. Dover School District
attempt to sue the school district for not having a class centered around the idea that God created the universe
Gibbons v. Ogden Interstate Commerce
government has the power to regulate interstate commerce
Lawrence v. Texas
as long as there are two consensual adults, any type of sex is legal
Crawford v. Washington
“heresay” is not recognized as valid evidence in court
Grutter v. Bollinger
practice of affirmative action- court ruled that race could be used in decisions to create more diversity in certain environments
US v. Nixon
president does have executive immunity and privilege, but that does not extend to the commitment of a crime
McDonnell v. Green
don’t need direct evidence to prove that a crime was committed
Reynolds v. Sims
“one man, one vote”- any kind of district that is used for elections, to possible extent, should be the same size in terms of population
Lemon v. Kurtzman
parochial (Christian) schools can get funding from the government, but they must pass the Lemon Test
NY Times v. US
it is legal to publish illegally obtained information
NY Times v. Sullivan
libel in the press- must be false, person who made the claim must know that it is false, and it must be printed/said with malice
Edwards v. SC
right to peaceable assembly
Concurring opinion
a written opinion by judges in court supporting a decision with reasoning for why