Exam, Diagnosis and Treatment Planning for Edentulous Patients Flashcards

(56 cards)

1
Q

3 DENTURE OCCLUSION

ARRANGEMENTS

A
  1. BALANCED
  2. NON-BALANCED
  3. LINGUALIZED (can be used with 1,2)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Balanced occlusion (Balanced articulation)

A

“the bilateral, simultaneous, anterior and posterior occlusal contact of
teeth in centric and eccentric positions” GPT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

anatomic, balanced occlusion indications (2)

A

young, healthy alveolar ridges

good neuromuscular control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

hanaus quint (5)

A
incisal guidance- anterior influence 
condylar guidance- posterior influence 
cusp hight (0, 20, 30 degrees)
plane of occlusion
compensating curve
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Condylar guidance is determined

by

A

the patient’s anatomy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

monoplane occlusion: indications (5)

A
excessive inter-ridge distance
skeletal class 2, class3, crossbones 
successful previous F/F were monoplane 
limited oral dexterity 
severely resorbed ridges
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Complete edentulism has differing

degrees of —

A

severity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

patient psychological classification (4)

A

philosophical
extracting/critical
hysterical
indifferent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

philosophical (4)

A

rational, calm, sensible, confident
“you make them, ill wear them”
the majority of patients
prognosis is good

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

extracting/critical patient (5)

A
methodical, precise
somewhat difficult to please 
may try to dictate treatment 
may demand a written guarantee 
should make a special effort to be neat and organized when treating
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

hysterical patient (5)

A

generally in poor health
oral conditions neglected
may blame dentist for poor oral condition
dont make promises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

indifferent patients (4)

A

unconcerned with appearance and chewing
often persuaded by relatives to seek treatment
diet often poor
prognosis poor unless education successful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Make — of the mouth
as the patient presents! Measure
existing —.

A

impressions

VDO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

dental history (2)

A

chief concerns or why the patient is in the chair

history of previous treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

medical history (2)

A

overall health and current medications

interactions causing xerostomia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Radiographic Exam (3)

A

Panoramic preferred
Evaluate pathosis : root tips, foreign bodies, impacted teeth
Evaluate mucosal thickness, foramen location

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

“the relationship of oral examination to dental diagnosis” (3)

A

MM House
a 12 page article describing a classification system of the biologic conditions found in edentulous mouths
13 intra oral items classified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

MM House, 1958 (2)

A
classified biological conditions of inter arch space, muscle tone, arch size, arch form, ridge relations, ridge contours, border tissue attachments, muscles and frenum attachments, palatal throat form, saliva, tongue form, sensitivity of palate, and condition of mucosa 
class 1, 2, 3
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

oral exam: ideal to unfavorable (3)

A
class 1: ideal
class2 
class 3: unfavorable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

oral exam: ridge size

Ideal

A

large enough for denture stability, small enough to leave room for denture bases and teeth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

oral exam: ridge size

unfavorable

A

too large for positioning of teeth, too small for any stability or support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Small ridge size

House Class —

A

III

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Large ridge size

House Class —

24
Q

oral exam: inter arch space

ideal

A

space accommodates teeth and bases with esthetic result

25
oral exam: inter arch space | unfavorable
too little space or too much space (torque lever is applied to denture bases)
26
oral exam: ridge form | ideal
square to gently rounded
27
oral exam: ridge form | unfavorable
tall, thin, undercut
28
Tuberosities (5)
``` Space ? Dental mirror thickness –a guide Dental mirror handle –2 denture bases Ideal = 5-6 mm (Choy E., General Dentistry, May-June, 1977) Minimum = 4 mm ```
29
Tuberosity/ridge exam | Look and Feel! (2)
Use your gloved first finger to feel the buccal and lingual ridge contours Mark (draw on) the diagnostic casts for communication with the patient and surgeon
30
bony undercuts: unilateral
may be ok
31
bony undercuts: bilateral
may need surgical correction
32
sharp area of ridge: --- needed
surgery
33
Palatal Torus (4)
Bony enlargement at midline of hard palate 20 - 25% of population More prevalent in women Maximum size in 3rd or 4th decade
34
Palatal torus | surgical removal when: (4)
Large and fills palatal vault Is undercut Encroaches on vibrating line Pnt is concerned that it is cancer
35
mandibular tori (3)
dense cortical bone covered by a. very thin later of mucous membrane extremely susceptible to irritation from denture base best treatment is surgical removal
36
Palatal vault form | Ideal is
medium depth with well-formed rugae
37
Palatal vault form | Flat =
poor resistance to horizontal movement of denture
38
Palatal vault form | High, narrow, deep =
rapid break of peripheral seal and poor retention
39
Soft Palate Class I = Class II Class III =
ideal (5 –12 mm available) -------- (3 - 5 mm tissue available) unfavorable(< 3 mm available)
40
Border attachments: | Ideal =
muscle/ frenum attachments are 10 mm or | more from crest of ridge
41
Border attachments: | Unfavorable =
attachments near crest of ridge and | may interfere with peripheral seal
42
The tongue and complete dentures | major impact areas: (3)
Border seal Tooth placement Speech
43
Normal tongue position (3)
Fills floor of mouth Lateral borders lie on post. alveolar ridge Apex approximates ant. alveolar ridge
44
Retruded tongue (4)
25% of edentulous pnts Border seal is absent Stabilizing influence of tongue is absent Retention/ function of mandib. CD difficult
45
tongue size | enlarged tongue- (2)
exerts constant dislodging force on mandibular denture | adaptation to denture may require months of dedicated effort
46
saliva (4)
plays important role in denture retention quantity and quality important xerostomia from meds and systemic diseases xerostomia patients- prognosis for CD success is guarded to poor
47
denture history (5)
``` years edentulous? previous dentures/current dentures successful? expectations? attainable? multiple sets of dentures made in a short time- not a good sign ```
48
Evaluate existing dentures and make | impressions of them as reference (6)
``` Phonetics, esthetics, stability, retention, lip support, OVD ```
49
prognosis (3)
advise patient of findings and discuss the prognosis: good, fair, poor educate patient about his/her role in mastering the use of dentures chewing efficiency: 20-25% natural teeth
50
Complete edentulism has differing | degrees of ---.
severity
51
``` Classification system for complete edentulism Class I --- Class II -- Class III -- Class IV – ```
straightforward denture-supporting anatomy degraded anatomy degraded; surgical revision needed; additional factors present most debilitated edentulous condition
52
Classification system for complete edentulism | Diagnostic criteria are organized by their
objective nature and not in their rank of significance.
53
Bone height –
mandibular only
54
Residual ridge morphology –
maxillary only
55
Muscle attachments –
mandibular only
56
classification system for complete edentulism
``` in those instances when a patients diagnostic criteria are mixed between two or more classes, any single criterion of a more complex class places the patient into the more complex class ACP 1 ACP 2 ACP 3 ACP 4 ```