EXAM NOTES - Mortgages Flashcards
who is the mortgagor?
the borrower
who is the mortgagee?
the lender
define a mortgage
1) Santley v Wilde - “conveyance of land as security for the payment of a debt”
2) “charge by deed by way of legal mortgage” ss 85 and 87 LPA
how is a legal mortgage created?
- s1(2)(c) LPA 1925 mortgage can be a legal interest in land
- s52 LPA 1925 a legal interest in land must be created by deed
- s85 and s87 LPA 1925 - to create a mortgage, execute a deed to say your land is being charged by way of legal mortgage
how is an equitable mortgage created?
- unenforceable at law
- could be enforced at equity if complies with s2 LP(MP)A 1989: formalities for a land contract
- United Bank of Kuwait v Sahib - confirmed need for compliance with s2 LP(MP)A 1989
how does someone with an equitable interest only create a mortgage?
- can only create an equitable mortgage
- equitable mortgage must comply with s53(1)(c) LPA 1925 signed writing
- because disposition of subsisting interest in land
what is the legal date of redemption?
- earliest date on which the lender allows repayment of the whole loan
What is the equity of redemption?
rights the borrower has in the property and how they are protected
What is covered by the equity of redemption?
(1) Prevention of redemption
(2) Postponement of redemption
(3) Options
(4) Collateral advantages for mortgagee
(5) Unconscionable terms
(6) Statutory regulations
(7) Undue influence
How do courts view the prevention of redemption
- do not allow it
- cannot prevent a borrower taking back their property Toomes v Conset
How do courts view the postponement of redemption?
- courts generally suspicious
- Fairclough v Swan Brewery - contract prevented redemption until there was only 6 weeks left on the leasehold; rendered redemption an illusion
When have courts allowed the postponement of redemption? Why?
Knightsbridge Estates v Byrne: repayment over 40 years upheld
o Preferential interest rate due to long repayment
o Freehold
o Legal advice
o No unconscionable behaviour
o Commercial transaction
Generally, how do courts view option contracts in mortgages?
- will strike out options as a clog on equity of redemption unless in a separate transaction
- Kreglinger v New Patagonia - once a mortgage always a mortgage
- the estate contract must satisfy requirements for a contract in s2 LP(MP)A 1989
- in writing, contain all terms, signed by both parties
In what cases did courts reject included estate contracts?
- Samuel v Jarrah Timber - option to purchase included in the mortgage deed. Struck out
- Jones v Morgan - option to purchase signed three years after mortgage but held to be part of the same transaction so struck out
When have courts accepted estate contracts? Why?
Reeve v Lisle
- option was in separate and independent transaction
- agreed ten days after mortgage
- courts look to a range of factors
- relationship between mortgagor and mortgagee
- equality of bargaining position
- commercial or domestic mortgage
- freehold or leasehold
what is the courts’ attitude to collateral advantages for mortgagees contained in the mortgage?
- may be acceptable if not unconscionable Kreglinger v New Patagonia
- look to bargaining power, commercial or domestic, etc
how long will collateral advantages continue?
- if part of the mortgage, cannot last beyond the mortgage’s duration Noakes v Rice
- if a wholly independent transaction, may continue after the mortgage Kreglinger v New Patagonia
How does the equity of redemption protect the mortgagor/borrower?
1) unconscionable terms
2) statutory regulation
3) undue influence
how does the concept of unconscionable terms protect the mortgagor?
- Holles v Wyse - unconscionable bargain or penal rate of interest can be struck out
- Cityland Properties v Dabrah - unconscionably high interest rate rewritten from 38% to 8%. Court can consider current interest rates and unequal bargaining power crucial.
How do courts decide if a term is unconscionable?
Multiservice Bookbinding v Marden
1) test is whether the terms are unconscionable, not whether unreasonable
2) equality of bargaining power?
3) borrower forced by necessity to take the terms?
4) borrower take advice, “eyes open”, know what they were doing?
5) any evidence of sharp practice, unfair or oppressive behaviour?
what statutory regulations protect mortgagors?
1) Consumer Credit Acts 2006 and 1974 - commercial and second mortgages
2) Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999
how does the CCA 2006 and 1974 protect mortgagors?
- Consumer Credit Acts - for second mortgages and buy-to-let mainly
- even if the case is not governed by it, case law can be referred to by analogy
1) Davies v Directloans – mortgagee can charge more if the borrower has a poor credit rating
2) Falco Finance v Gough – penalty interest rate imposed after one late payment - an ‘extortionate credit bargain’
3) Paragon Finance v Nash - lenders can vary rates based on their own financial problems
How does the UTCCR 1999 affect mortgagors?
- Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations
- was the deal contrary to good faith?
- did it cause a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights?
- eg the penalty interest rate in Falco Finance v Gough
What is the general principle about undue influence?
1) Kingsnorth Trust v Bell - if the mortgagor or one of the mortgagors was unduly influenced into signing the deed the mortgage is unenforceable against them
2) if the bank fails to prevent undue influence it could be held to have constructive notice of undue influence and will take the property subject to M’s interest, which may be overriding
3) overriding interest: actual occupation + interest in land Sch 3 para 2 LRA 2002