Exam Prep Flashcards
(44 cards)
Name the five elements of transformative constitutionalism as identified by Klare. (5)
- Justiciable bill of rights
- Politicized rule of law
- Progressive legal culture
- Critical system of adjudication
- Post-liberal constitution.
Which branch of the law-making processes of democratic societies does Klare focus on in his article? (1)
Adjudication: judiciary process of interpretation
State Klare’s explanation for why the above process qualifies as a ‘law-making process’. (3)
- Law has no inherent meaning. Legal texts are written documents and are not self-explanatory;
- the text is always interpreted by the reader and through this given meaning . when judges read sources of law they can never be totally constrained by the legal sources as they always have to be interpreted.
- Through this interpretation the judges give meaning to the texts which create precedents and effectively make law in this way as other courts will be bound by this specific interpretation.
Explain in your own words what you understand of Klare’s contention that adjudication is characterized by a dialectic between freedom and constraint? (4)
This ‘dialectic’ refers to the tension between the two opposing concepts of freedom and constraint.
On the one hand we have a constitutional text, which encompasses a language that seeks to promote justice, overcome injustice and move towards a democratic and caring society.
However, we have a commitment to legal constraint, which seems to be the foundation of the democratic enterprise evoked in the mantra of the rule of law.
This means that judges and lawyers are not completely at large to say and do as they please by the lights of whatever personal vision they hold. Furthermore, adjudication is not and cannot be infinitely plastic and open-ended.
State the extended definition of transformative constitutionalism. (7)
(1) long term project of
(2) constitutional enactment, interpretation and enforcement committed
(3) not in isolation but in a historical context of conducive political development
(4) to transforming political and social institutions
and (5) power relations
through (6) a (7) democratic and participatory and egalitarian direction
State the truncated definition of transformative constitutionalism. (5)
It is an (1) enterprise of inducing a large-scale social change through (2) non-violent political processes (3) grounded in law. This transformative constitutionalism is (4) more vast than reform yet something different from (5) revolution.
Klare states six reasons to justify his contention that the South African Constitution is postliberal. Name these reasons. (6)
- Social rights and substantive conception of equality
- Affirmative state duties
- Horizontality
- Participatory governance
- Multiculturalism
- Historical self-consciousness
what is social rights and substantive conception of equality (klare)
constitution takes into account that political freedom and socio-economic rights/justice are inextricably linked. The constitution does not merely proclaim that everyone has political freedom but commits to creating a society in which people actually have the resources to exercise those rights. Our constitution recognises that there is a difference between substantive equality and formal equality. – Substantive, over formal justice.
what are affirmative state duties (klare)
traditional liberal constitutions refrain states from interfering with people’s rights. Our constitution puts an obligation of positive duties the on state i.e. progressive real rights.
what is horizontality (klare)
between two private individuals. If the Common law cannot help you then constitution can be used through direct horizontal application or can use the horizontal indirect to application. ie to develop common law and then the common law will help you. Most liberal constitutions only deal with vertical application of constitution between state and private individuals. Note: Indirect horizontality doesn’t work directly with the constitution but changes the common law to allow people access to private rights. (Indirect, horizontal application – willes - s8(2) .)
what is participatory governance (klare)
post liberal government is decentralised i.e. national and provincial. Public participation in drafting of bills. Our constitution envisages a government that will actively promote and deepen a culture of democracy
what is multiculturalism (klare)
our constitution celebrates multiculturalism and diversity and promotes unity in diversity. It promotes gender equality and rights for vulnerable and victimised groups in society.
what is historical self consciousness (klare)
our constitution is an instrument committed to social transformation and reconstruction. It seeks to change the inequalities of the past; to transform society from one which is characterised by deep inequalities; to one where all are equal and this equality is achieved substantively with reference to our past.
Legal materials mean whatever we want them to mean. (1) True or false
False
Legal constraint is not itself a product of the context in which a judge finds herself. (1) t or f
False
Previous interpretations of legal materials do not partially constitute these materials and does not imbue them with value-laden meanings. (1)
false
Legal culture is constituted by professional sensibilities, habits of mind, and intellectual reflexes. (1)
True
Legal culture shouldn’t limit the ambitions and achievements of democratic transformation. (1)
True
South African legal interpretation is more ‘policy-orientated and consequentialist’ whereas legal interpretation in the United States is more technicist and literal. (1)
False
According to Klare South African legal culture is transformative because the Constitution is progressive. (2)
False
The right to life in the interim Constitution self-evidently prohibited the imposition of the death penalty.
False
Why does Klare think that there is an obligation of political self-reflection and candor upon the judiciary when it adjudicates? (8)
- personal or political values and sensibilities cannot be excluded from the interpretative processes or adjudication. the exclusion called by the justiciable rule of law ideal is quite simply impossible.
- Judges make value-laden choices in their routine interpretations. They are responsible for the social and distributive consequences that result from these choices and therefore should be judged accordingly.
- Legal practitioners should acknowledge their political and moral responsibility in adjudication and share the secret with their publics in the interest of transparency.
- Thus political self reflection and legal candor raises 3 points:
- legal candor would empower publics to examine , discuss and criticise the hidden political and moral assumption that are currently steering adjudication
- The political process could send signals to the other branches of government emphasizing that the judiciary are not the only branch obliged to enforce the constitution
- A more politically self conscious legal process would be more faithful to the constitutions democratic ethos and in particular would give meaning to the explicit command of s41 (1) c all organs of state must provide transparent accountable and coherent government. Indeed the con seems to impose an obligation of political self-reflection and candor on the judiciary
Name four features of critical adjudication (2 softenings, 2 understandings)
Understandings:
- Legal texts do not self generate meaning
- An understanding that the experience of constraint of legal materials is an experience or interpretation of them, and is not innate to them materials themselves. Softenings:
- Law and politics are inextricably linked
- Distinction between the professional obligation to stay true to the text and strategic effort to bring about a certain result in the name of justice
Why should the ‘indelible impression of a disconnect’ between the Constitution’s transformative aspirations and the traditionalism of South African legal culture concern us both academically and normatively? (5)
For one thing, the conventions of South African culture make it particularly uncomfortable for South African lawyers to acknowledge their political discretion and power in adjudication. But expressions of faith in the constraining power of legal texts and ritual invocation of the law/politics boundary obscure and mystify the choices judges and advocates routinely make in their interpretive work. This reduces the transparency of the legal process, thereby undermining its contribution to deepening democratic culture.
Moreover, jurisprudential conservatism may induce a kind of intellectual caution that discourages appropriate constitutional innovation and leads to less generous or innovative interpretations and applications of the Constitution than are permitted by the text and drafting history. Even progressive judges comfortable with an activist role may take for granted limitations on their interpretive scope that owe more to tradition than to the responsibilities and obligations of their role under this Constitution.