Exam Questions Flashcards
(73 cards)
Bruno and Diane were divorced four years ago. The court ordered Bruno to pay Diane $1,800 per month until their 4-year-old son turns 18.
Two years later. Bruno moved in with Édith, his new common-law partner.
Three months ago, Bruno died in an accident. In his will, he left everything to Édith and their 6-month-old baby, neglecting to provide funds to respect the court order in favour ofDiane. Edith had taken out a $50.000 life insurance policy on Bruno from ABC Insurance, naming herself as beneficiary, to provide some income replacement in the event of Brunos death.
What recourse does Diane have in this situation?
a) She can sue Édith personally.
b) She can sue Bruno’s estate.
c) She can sue ABC Insurance.
d) She has no recourse.
b) She can sue Bruno’s estate.
Explanation:
When a court orders someone to pay spousal or child support, that obligation does not automatically disappear upon their death.
Since Bruno did not make provisions to continue the payments, Diane can file a claim against his estate to enforce the court order.
The estate includes any assets Bruno owned at the time of his death (e.g., property, savings, investments, etc.).
Francesca and John are in their late 50s and retiring soon. They did very well in the stock market over the years and have enough saved up to start living their retirement dreams. Although they plan to keep their family home, they have recently purchased a condo in Mexico to spend the winter months in.
Otherwise, they will split their time between their home and the cottage that john’s father left him upon his death ten years ago. They have three children that are young adults and would like to transfer these valuable assets to them upon their deaths.
In their current situation, what should their main concern be?
a) In the event John passes away, the cottage would need to be sold in order to pay the estate taxes.
-b) Once both Francesca and John have passed away, the tax liability would force the executor to liquidate whatever assets necessary to settle the estate.
c) In the event that either Francesca or John passes away before the other, the tax liability would force the executor to liquidate one of the properties.
d) in the event that Francesca passes away, the condo would have to be sold in order to pay the estate taxes.
b) Once both Francesca and John have passed away, the tax liability would force the executor to liquidate whatever assets necessary to settle the estate.
Explanation:
In Canada, when a person dies, their assets are deemed to be sold at fair market value unless they transfer to a spouse (spousal rollover) or a qualified trust.
Since Francesca and John own multiple valuable assets (a family home, a cottage, and a condo in Mexico), there will be capital gains taxes due upon the second spouse’s death (because the first spouse can defer taxes through the spousal rollover).
Their estate could face a large tax bill, which may require selling some assets to cover the cost.
Mike, a 41-year-old non-smoker, has been living with 32-year-old Nancy for three years. Nancy has just given birth to a little boy. Their insurance agent suggests that Mike purchase individual life insurance.
Mike tells him that he is covered by group life insurance convertible for the full coverage amount if the plan were to be terminated or if he left his job in 10 or even 20 years.
By not taking his agent’s suggestion, what disadvantage could Mike face in 10 or 20 years?
•a) Mike would not face any disadvantage.
• b) Mike would lose his life insurance coverage.
c) His premiums could be substantially higher.
d) His coverage amount would be reduced.
c) His premiums could be substantially higher.
Explanation:
Mike is currently 41 years old and in good health.
His group life insurance is convertible, meaning he can switch it to an individual policy without medical underwriting if he leaves his job or the plan is terminated.
However, if he waits 10 or 20 years to get individual coverage, he will be older (51 or 61 years old) and possibly less healthy.
Life insurance premiums increase with age, so waiting will likely result in substantially higher costs compared to locking in a rate now.
Jerry and Margaret, both aged 70, are reassessing the need to keep their whole life insurance policies.
Jerry’s policy has a CSV of $50,000 and an ACB of $20,000, while Margaret’s policy has a CSV of $40,000, and an ACB of $14.000. Jerry is currently in a 40% marginal tax bracket and Margaret is in a 30% marginal tax bracket.
What would jerry and Margaret have left after tax if they proceed with surrendering their policies?
a) $7,800.
b) $12,000.
c) $19,800.
d) $70,200.
d)70,200
Step 1: Calculate the Taxable Gain for Each Policy: TaxableGain=CashSurrenderValue(CSV)−AdjustedCostBasis(ACB)
Step 2: Calculate the Tax Payable: taxable gain X Marginal tax rate
Step 3: Calculate the After-Tax Amount =CSV−TaxPayable
Chris and Irene are a young married couple. They got married just last year and recently had their first child together. Irene is on maternity leave but expects to go back to work as a paralegal when the baby turns one. Chris is a director at a logistics company but is planning to step down into a lower management position with all the changes to their life. They meet with their life insurance agent Shawn to complete a needs analysis for life insurance. During the process they learn that their cost of living is quite high and they spend most of the income that they make. Besides their mortgage, which is covered by mortgage protection insurance, they have no other debts.
What would be the most concerning risk that needs to be addressed for Chris and Irene?
a) Loss of either of their incomes
b) Debt repayment on mortgage
c) Estate creation to establish a legacy
d) Pay for final expenses
a) Loss of either of their incomes
Explanation:
Chris and Irene are a young family with a high cost of living and no major savings since they spend most of their income.
Chris is also planning to step down to a lower-paying position, reducing their household income.
While their mortgage is covered by mortgage protection insurance, it only covers the mortgage balance, not daily living expenses.
If either Chris or Irene were to pass away, the surviving spouse would struggle financially, especially with a child to care for.
Dominic and Magalie have been married for five years and have three children, aged four, seven and nine. Dominic and Magalie are divorcing and Magalie has been ordered to pay child support, until the youngest reaches age 20. The court has specified her monthly obligation to be $2,000.
What type of insurance provides the most cost-effective solution and how much insurance is needed?
a) Whole life insurance with coverage of $600.000.
b) Term-to-100 with coverage of $600,000
c) 25-year term life insurance with coverage of $480,000.
d) 20-year term life insurance with coverage of $480,000.
d) 20-year term life insurance with coverage of $480,000.
Why:
Magalie’s child support obligation is $2,000 per month until the youngest child reaches age 20.
20-year term life insurance matches the time frame, ensuring coverage during the support period.
The coverage amount of $480,000 ensures that if Magalie passes away, there will be enough to cover 20 years of child support at $2,000/month.
Jocelyn and Jeannine recently divorced. The divorce judgment orders Jocelyn to pay $600 per month in child support to Jeannine to support their two children for a period of 20 years after the divorce. The judgment also orders Jocelyn to guarantee payment of said support in the event of his death by means of life insurance. Jocelyn earns $250,000 per year and has several rental buildings. His marginal tax rate is 48%.
Which type of insurance policy should Jocelyn buy?
a) Whole life insurance of $250,000.
b) Term insurance to age 65 of $120,000.
c) T-20 insurance of $144,000.
d) T-20 insurance of $120,000.
c) T-20 insurance of $144,000.
Why:
Child support is $600/month for 20 years, totaling $144,000 in support payments.
T-20 (20-year term) insurance provides the most cost-effective coverage, matching the child support period (20 years).
The coverage amount of $144,000 ensures the child support can be paid if Jocelyn passes away.
David agreed to drive his young children via a major highway to an amusement park Despite his reservations, he rode with them on roller coasters, ate junk food, and ran an obstacle course to win a prize.
From a risk perspective, what strategy did David employ?
a) Risk avoidance.
b) Risk reduction.
c) Risk retention.
d) Risk transfer.
c) Risk retention.
Why:
Risk retention means accepting the risk and not taking action to avoid or reduce it.
David accepted the risks (driving on a highway, riding roller coasters, eating junk food) without taking steps to mitigate them, which shows he retained the risks.
Jérémie, Pascal and Stéphane are equal shareholders in Désauto Inc. Each shareholder has a life insurance policy naming the co-shareholders as beneficiaries so they can buy the shares of the deceased shareholder. Upon Stéphane’s death, his wife Dominique inherited his shares. When Jérémie and Pascal wanted to buy her shares, Dominique asked for a much higher price that not only exceeded the amount the shareholders had discussed but that was also much higher than the amount stipulated in the policy. This forced Jérémie and Pascal to be co-shareholders with Dominique, who has no experience managing such a company.
What measure should the shareholders have taken to prevent such a situation?
a) Have a written buy-sell agreement in place.
b) Have legal representatives draft a formal will for each shareholder.
c) Fund the purchase of the shares with business-owned insurance.
d) Fund the purchase of the shares with the “criss-cross insurance” method.
Jérémie, Pascal and Stéphane are equal shareholders in Désauto Inc. Each shareholder has a life insurance policy naming the co-shareholders as beneficiaries so they can buy the shares of the deceased shareholder. Upon Stéphane’s death, his wife Dominique inherited his shares. When Jérémie and Pascal wanted to buy her shares, Dominique asked for a much higher price that not only exceeded the amount the shareholders had discussed but that was also much higher than the amount stipulated in the policy. This forced Jérémie and Pascal to be co-shareholders with Dominique, who has no experience managing such a company.
What measure should the shareholders have taken to prevent such a situation?
a) Have a written buy-sell agreement in place
b) Have legal representatives draft a formal will for each shareholder.
c) Fund the purchase of the shares with business-owned insurance.
d) Fund the purchase of the shares with the “criss-cross insurance” method
Richard was recently divorced. He has made a new will and is bequeathing all his assets to his children, including an antique car collection he inherited from his father. The ACB of the collection is $100,000, but its current market value is $400,000. Richard’s marginal tax rate is 40%. He is considering buying life insurance to relieve his estate of the tax burden created by the value of the collection.
What amount of life insurance should Richard buy?
a) $400.000.
b) $300,000.
c) $100,000.
d) $60,000.
b) $300,000.
Why:
The estate tax liability arises from the capital gain on the antique car collection.
The capital gain is calculated as:
Market value ($400,000) - ACB ($100,000) = $300,000 gain.
The tax liability on the gain is:
$300,000 x 40% tax rate = $120,000.
Richard should buy $300,000 in life insurance to cover the potential tax liability.
Glen and Ted have recently entered into a purchase and sale agreement. Glen is buying Ted’s public accounting practice for $250,000: the small commercial building for $50,000, and the book of business for $200,000. The business is to be paid for with a lump-sum deposit of $50,000 and the annual billings across three years. The building itself will be paid for in annual instalments across five years, and Ted will charge an extra 10% of the value of the building to hold what is essentially a private mortgage.
Ted is concerned about mortality risk. He is 65, and had a life-threatening heart attack when he was
40. He wants to ensure his wife is paid out what he is owed in this deal if he were to die within the next five years.
Which option would best suit this purchase and sale agreement?
a) A $250,000 joint first-to-die policy on Ted and Glen’s lives.
b) A $250,000 whole life policy on Ted’s life.
c) A $200,000 term-5 policy on Ted and Glen’s lives.
d) A $205,000 term-5 policy on Ted’s life.
d) A $205,000 term-5 policy on Ted’s life.
Why:
Ted needs life insurance to ensure his wife is paid if he dies within the next five years.
The $250,000 sale agreement is broken down into two parts:
$50,000 for the building (with installment payments over 5 years)
$200,000 for the book of business (with payments over 3 years).
Ted’s concern is ensuring his wife is paid the amount owed for both parts in case of his death.
Term-5 insurance for $205,000 will cover the remaining payments for the building ($50,000) and the book of business ($200,000), aligning with the structure of the deal.
Julie is a single mom with a 10-year-old daughter named Aby.
Julie has regular employment at a bank that gives her financial security, as she doesn’t receive any support payments for either her or Aby.
Almost all her income goes towards their current expenses (rent, food, clothing and car). Julie believes a university education is important and invests a portion of her savings in an education fund for Aby. Julie wants to get life insurance coverage that will allow Aby to finish her university studies if Julie dies.
What type of life insurance policy would allow Julie to meet this need?
a) A 15-year term insurance policy on Aby’s life.
• b) A 15-year term insurance policy on Julie’s life.
• c) A 15-year joint first-to-die tem insurance policy.
• d) A 15-year joint last-to-die term insurance policy.
b) A 15-year term insurance policy on Julie’s life.
Why:
Julie needs life insurance to ensure that Aby can finish her university studies if Julie dies.
A 15-year term policy on Julie’s life would provide the necessary coverage for Aby’s education until she finishes university (assuming this takes about 15 years).
The policy would cover Aby’s education expenses in case Julie passes away within that term.
Fifteen years ago, Tony purchased a $200,000 UL policy. The policy provides for a death benefit equal to the initial coverage plus account value. When Tony died last month, his marginal tax rate was 48% and the policy’s account value was $10,200.
How much of the death benefit will the estate keep after filing Tony’s final income tax return?
a) $104,000
b) $109,304.
c) $200.000.
d) $210,200.
D) $210,200
Why:
Tony’s UL policy has a death benefit equal to the initial coverage plus the account value.
Initial coverage: $200,000
Account value at death: $10,200
Total death benefit:
200,000+10,200=210,200
In Canada, life insurance death benefits are tax-free, meaning Tony’s estate does not owe income tax on the $210,200.
Since the full $210,200 is received tax-free, the estate will keep the entire amount.
Damien and Jennifer are shareholders of Aurora Inc., each of them holding 50%. They have prepared a buy-sell agreement between them which is funded by criss-cross life insurance. The shareholders’ marginal tax rate is 45%.
What percentage of the premiums will Damien and Jennifer be able to deduct from their income tax?
• a) 0 %.
• b) 45 %.
• c) 50 %.
d) 100 %.
a) 0%.
Why:
Criss-cross life insurance is a type of insurance where each shareholder buys a policy on the other shareholder’s life to fund a buy-sell agreement.
Premiums paid for criss-cross life insurance are not tax-deductible as they are considered a personal expense, not a business expense.
Therefore, Damien and Jennifer cannot deduct any portion of the premiums from their income tax.
Deductible Life Insurance Premiums = 0% (if personally owned in a criss-cross buy-sell agreement).
If the corporation owned the policy (instead of individual shareholders), the situation might be different, but here, because Damien and Jennifer own the policies personally, they cannot deduct premiums.
Auston is a 25-year-old carpenter. He started his career a couple of years ago, and is looking at different ways to put money away for the future. He has a TFSA and an RRSP which he is putting quite a bit into. As an alternative, his father suggests he meet with the family’s life insurance agent to start a life insurance policy while he is young and healthy. Auston speaks with the agent and really likes the idea of policy dividends and guaranteed cash values.
Which type of policy is best suited to Auston’s needs and preferences?
a) A term-100 policy.
b) A universal life policy.
c) A participating life insurance policy.
d) A non-participating life insurance policy.
c) A participating life insurance policy.
Why:
Auston wants policy dividends and guaranteed cash values, which are features of participating whole life insurance.
Participating policies allow policyholders to receive dividends, which can be used for premium reductions, cash withdrawals, or accumulating more cash value.
These policies also offer guaranteed cash values, making them a good option for long-term savings and financial security.
Fernand purchased a $100,000 whole life insurance policy on his son Jacob when he was born. The policy includes several riders and supplementary benefits. When Jacob turned 25, Fernand assigned ownership of the policy to him. Since then, Jacob was able to increase the amount of coverage on his policy three times despite having high blood pressure and diabetes. He added $25,000 when he got married and $25,000 on the birth of each of his two children.
Which rider or supplementary benefit allowed jacob to increase his insurance?
a) Family coverage rider.
b) Child coverage rider.
c) Guaranteed insurability benefit rider.
d) Critical illness benefit.
c) Guaranteed insurability benefit rider.
Why:
This rider allows the policyholder to increase coverage at specific life events (like marriage or childbirth) without requiring medical evidence.
Jacob was able to increase his coverage despite having high blood pressure and diabetes, which suggests he had a rider that waived the need for medical underwriting.
Suzanne is 81 years old and the proud great-grandmother to Marcel. She always bought life insurance policies on her children, at birth, and would like to gift one to Marcel. She wants the peace of mind in knowing that the policy will grow over time, with little supervision.
In addition to a participating whole life policy, what type of coverage would be the best suggestion to Suzanne?
a) A guaranteed insurability benefit (GIB) rider. so that he could continue to grow the coverage over time.
b) A paid-up additions (PUA) rider, so that the coverage continues to grow over time.
c) A payor waiver benefit upon the policyholder’s death.
d) A term rider that could be converted to permanent life insurance when Marcel is older.
b) A paid-up additions (PUA) rider, so that the coverage continues to grow over time.
Why:
A PUA rider allows the policy’s cash value and death benefit to grow over time without requiring additional premiums.
Since Suzanne wants the policy to grow with little supervision, this is the best option.
Simon and Maryse are married and have two children aged two and four. They have agreed that Maryse would stay home with the children until the youngest turns 18. Simon would like to purchase and pay premiums on a $200,000 term life insurance policy on Maryse so that he can hire a caregiver for his children in the event Maryse dies prematurely. Simon tells his insurance agent that he would not like to see the policy lapse due to non-payment if he were to become disabled before his children turned 18.
Which rider or supplementary benefit should the agent provide on the policy to reassure Simon?
a) Waiver of premium for total disability of the insured.
b) Waiver of premium for total disability of the payor.
c) Paid-up additions rider.
d) Child coverage rider.
b) Waiver of premium for total disability of the payor.
Why:
Simon is the payor of the policy (he’s paying the premiums).
If Simon becomes disabled, he wants to ensure the policy stays active.
A waiver of premium for total disability of the payor ensures the insurance company covers the premiums if Simon becomes disabled.
Donald finds out from his doctor that he only has about 10 months to live. He owns a $100,000 life insurance policy with a terminal illness benefit of $50,000. Donald has named Yvana as the policy’s irrevocable beneficiary.
Donald wants to know whether he has to obtain Yvana’s consent concerning the amount he will be paid as the terminal illness benefit. He would also like to know how much yvana will receive after his death.
What should his insurance agent tell him?
(a) He does not have to obtain Yand’s consent. He will collect $50.000 before taxes and Yvano will receive $50,000 tax free
b) He does not have to obtain Yvana’S consent. Both he and Yvana will receive $50,000 before
c) He must obtain Yvana’s consent. He will collect $50,000 tax free and Yvana will receive $50.000 before taxes.
d) He must obtain Yvana’s consent. Each of them will collect $50,000 tax free.
(c) He must obtain Yvana’s consent. He will collect $50,000 tax-free, and Yvana will receive $50,000 before taxes.
Why:
Yvana is an irrevocable beneficiary, meaning Donald needs her consent to make changes that affect the death benefit.
The terminal illness benefit allows Donald to access $50,000 tax-free while still alive.
After Donald’s death, Yvana will receive the remaining $50,000, which is typically tax-free as a life insurance payout.
André bought whole life insurance of $250,000 on the life of his son Jean when he was born 35 years ago. Jean is now the policyholder since his father died last year. The policy currently has a cash surrender value of $ 100,000 and an ACB of $18,000. Recently, Jean assigned the policy to his bank in return for a business loan of $50,000.
What policy gain will be triggered by assigning the policy to the bank as collateral?
• a) No policy gain.
• b) $18,000.
• c) $32,000.
• d) $50,000.
(c) $32,000
Why:
A policy gain occurs when a policy is assigned as collateral for a loan, and the cash surrender value (CSV) exceeds the adjusted cost basis (ACB).
Policy gain formula:
PolicyGain=min(LoanAmount)−ACB
=min(50,000,100,000)−18,000
=50,000−18,000=32,000
This $32,000 is taxable as income in the year of assignment.
Since the policy gain is based on the lesser of the loan amount or the CSV, we take $50,000$ (loan amount) instead of $100,000.
Devon is a single, fourth-year medical student at Prince University. He would like to have a $10,000,000 policy, just like his mother, who is a world-renowned oncologist. He is thinking far ahead to his estate planning needs and would like to lock in the price of his premiums while he is still young.
What must his agent advise Devon to expect from an underwriting standpoint?
a) It is not a justifiable amount of coverage at this time in his life. The agent should then show him the value a guaranteed insurability benefit rider can provide
b) As long as his mother is the payor of the policy, there should not be a problem with the financial underwriting.
c) He can probably get around the underwriter justifying the amount of coverage by taking out a $2.000,000 policy each year for the next five years
d) He should take out a term policy in that amount; the premium will be much lower and it will cause less concern with underwriting as far as his ability to pay the premium is concerned
Correct answer: (a)
Explanation:
Insurance companies require financial justification for high coverage amounts. Since Devon is still a student with no established income, a $10,000,000 policy is not justifiable at this time. Instead, the agent should suggest a guaranteed insurability benefit (GIB) rider, which allows him to increase coverage later without proving insurability.
Dr. Marc Leblanc has joined Doctors without Borders and is planning to leave within two weeks for a posting in a refugee camp in the Middle East. He has four children, all younger than 12, a spouse, and an elderly father who depends on Marc’s support. Marc is applying for a $5 million policy on his life and his health is excellent.
Marc is requesting that a Temporary Insurance Agreement (TIA) be issued for $500,000.
What should the agent do?
a) He should issue the TIA for $100,000 to limit the insurers risk
b) He should suggest Marc reduce the requested sum of coverage to improve the likelihood of the policy being issued
c) He should issue the TIA since Marc has a very high need for immediate insurance coverage.
d) He should not issue the TIA since Marc may be uninsurable due to his travel plan.
Correct answer: (d)
Explanation:
A Temporary Insurance Agreement (TIA) provides coverage before full underwriting is completed, but it is only issued if the applicant is likely insurable under normal conditions.
Marc’s imminent travel to a high-risk area (a refugee camp in the Middle East) could make him uninsurable due to war, terrorism, or poor living conditions. The agent should not issue the TIA, as the insurer may deny coverage based on travel risks.
Richard and Carol are divorcing. While they were married, Carol did not work. In the last five years of the marriage, Richard earned no less than $150.000 annually. Carol is unlikely to ever work due to her medical conditions. Richard has been ordered to pay Carol $5.000 per month for 20 years. At the time of the settlement, investment returns average 5% and the inflation rate is 3.1%.
How much life insurance should Richard acquire to meet his obligation, using the capital drawdown method?
Find real rate of return: (1+ ret.avg / 1 + inf. Rate) - 1
Present value of annuity: P X ( 1- 1/(1+r)^n/ r
a) $1 million
b) $1.2 million
c) $3.16 million
d) $63.2 million,
Correct answer: a) $1 million
Explanation:
The capital drawdown method calculates the present value of future payments, considering investment returns (5%) and inflation (3.1%).
Richard must pay $5,000 per month ($60,000 per year) for 20 years.
The real rate of return (adjusted for inflation) is (1.05 / 1.031) - 1 ≈ 1.84%.
Using the present value of annuity formula, the required life insurance amount is approximately $1.2 million to fund these payments.
Erin and Jaymie, both aged 35, are married and currently don’t have any children. Erin works as a veterinarian making $100,000 a year, and Jaymie is a seasonal truck driver, making $25,000 a year.
They recently purchased their first home, which has a mortgage balance of $300,000. They have a line of credit with a current balance of $15,000. Two years ago, Erin unfortunately lost her mother to cancer, and would like to leave $25,000 to the local cancer society office. As the higher income earner, Erin feels it’s necessary to provide Jaymie with some income replacement coverage so that he can maintain their standard of living. They both would like funeral expenses covered.
Based on the above information, which of Erin’s needs would term insurance be best suited for?
a) Covering the mortgage, paying off current debts, leaving money to local charity.
b) Covering the mortgage, income replacement for Jaymie, paying off current debts.
c) Covering the mortgage, funeral expenses, leaving money to local charity.
d) Covering the mortgage, income replacement for Jaymie, funeral expenses.
(b) Covering the mortgage, income replacement for Jaymie, paying off current debts.
Explanation: Term insurance is a suitable option for Erin’s needs because it provides a temporary solution with a defined coverage period. The following needs would be well-suited for term insurance:
Covering the mortgage: Term insurance can be used to pay off the mortgage balance if Erin passes away.
Income replacement for Jaymie: Term insurance can provide Jaymie with financial support to replace Erin’s income for a specified period.
Paying off current debts: The line of credit and any other debts can also be covered under the term insurance policy.
While the charitable donation and funeral expenses can be considered, term insurance is most commonly used for income replacement and debt coverage needs.