Exclusion Clauses Flashcards

1
Q

Exclusion clause definition

A

Clause that attempts to nullify liability where one party claims not to be responsible for what happens within the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Regulation for exclusion clauses under common law

A
  • Has the clause been incorporated in the contract?
  • Does the clause cover the alleged breach?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ways of incorporating clause in the contract:

A

By signature
By reasonable notice
By previous course of dealings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

By signature meaning

A

If a document is signed at the time of making the contract, its content becomes terms of that contract, regardless of whether they have been read and understood.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

By reasonable notice meaning

A

A party seeking to rely on an unfair term must demonstrate that they gave reasonable notice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

By previous course of dealings meaning

A

If the parties have dealt with each other before then the term may be incorporated through these dealings even where the term was not brough to the attention of the other party on this occasion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Case for incorporation through signature

A

L’Estrange v Graucob

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Case for incorporation through reasonable notice

A

Olley v Marlborough Court Hotel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Case for incorporation through previous dealings

A

Hollier v Rambler Motors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Contra proferentem rule

A

Used to answer if the clause covers the alleged breach. Where there is any ambiguity in the wording of the clause, the courts will interpret the clause against the party seeking to use it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Case for the contra proferentem rule

A

Andrew Bros Ltd v Singer Cars

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Statutory control, and when it is used

A

Statutory controls are brought up to check if the exclusion clause does not conflict with implied terms.
Enforces Unfair Contract Terms 1977 and Consumer Rights Act 2015

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 cover?

A

Liability for negligence (s.2)
Liability for non-performance (s.3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Unfair Contract Terms s.2

A

Liability for death or personal injury resulting from negligence cannot be excluded. Any clause which attempts to do this will be rendered ineffective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Unfair Contract Terms s.3

A

Restrictions on the ability to:
- Exclude/restrict liability for breach of contract.
- Provide a different performance to that reasonably expected/no performance at all.

Invokes s.11

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Unfair Contract Terms s.11

A

Reasonableness test:
Term must be fair and reasonable (based on everything that is and should be known).

Party relying on it must have the resources to cover themselves from the exclusion clause.

Party relying on the clause must prove it was fair and reasonable.

17
Q

Consumer Rights Act s.31

A

In relation to selling goods, it is not allowed to bring an exclusion clause contradicting the following:
s.9-11
s.14 & 15

18
Q

Consumer Rights Act s.57

A

In relation to providing services, it is not allowed to bring an exclusion clause contradicting s.49-52

19
Q

Consumer Rights Act s.65

A

It is prohibited to have an exclusion from liability of death or personal injury.