Exemption Clauses Flashcards

(16 cards)

1
Q

Incorporation by Signature

A

If a party signs the contract, they are bound by all its terms, including exemption clauses, even if they didn’t read it
Case: L’Estrange v Graucob (1934)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Incorporation by Notice require

A

Exemption clauses must be clearly communicated before or at the time of contract formation.
Case: Parker v South Eastern Railway (1877)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Course of Dealing

A

If the same exemption clause has been used consistently in past dealings, it may be implied in the current contract.
Case: Spurling v Bradshaw (1956)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Onerous / Unusual Terms

A

If a term is particularly harsh or unusual, the other party must be made aware of it in a clear way.
Case: Interfoto v Stiletto (1989)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Contra Proferentem Rule

A

Ambiguous or unclear clauses will be interpreted against the party who drafted them.
Case: Andrews Bros v Singer (1934)

Flashcard 6:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Misrepresentation

A

If a false representation is made about the clause, it may render the clause void.
Case: Curtis v Chemical Cleaning (1951)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Doctrine of Fundamental Breach

A

Exemption clauses do not protect against serious breaches unless the clause clearly covers that situation.
Case: Photo Production v Securicor (1980)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is UCTA 1977 (Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977)?

A

UCTA regulates the enforceability of exemption clauses, specifically in business-to-business contracts.
Exemption clauses cannot exclude liability for death or personal injury caused by negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Section 2 UCTA 1977

A

Exemption clauses cannot exclude liability for death or personal injury caused by negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Section 3 UCTA 1977

A

If one party uses standard terms, exclusion of liability for negligence can only be valid if it is reasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Section 8 UCTA 1977

A

Exemption clauses cannot exclude liability for implied terms (e.g., under the Sale of Goods Act) unless reasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA)

A

Definition: CRA bans unfair terms and protects consumers’ rights.
Terms must be transparent and fair (s62). Unfair terms are not binding.
Cannot exclude liability for death/personal injury due to negligence (s65).
Cannot exclude statutory consumer rights (goods must be of satisfactory quality, fit for purpose).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is an Exemption Clause?

A

A term in a contract that attempts to limit (limitation clause) or exclude (exclusion clause) one party’s liability for certain types of breaches or losses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is an Unfair Term?

A

A term in a contract that causes a significant imbalance in the rights and obligations of the parties, to the detriment of the consumer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the Contra Proferentem Rule?

A

The rule that ambiguous clauses are interpreted against the party that created them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the Test of Reasonableness?

A

A test under UCTA that checks if an exemption clause is fair and reasonable in light of the circumstances at the time of contract formation.
Key Factors: Bargaining power, knowledge of the clause, alternatives.