Exemption Clauses Flashcards

(20 cards)

1
Q

Which statute regulates exemption clauses?

A

UCTA 1977

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Contra proferentem rule

A

when a contract term is ambiguous, the meaning should be interpreted against the interests of the party who wrote it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When will the courts apply the contra proferentem rule with less rigour?

A

where the clause in question merely limits (rather than excludes) liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The court is less likely to read a clause contra-proferentem in a contract between

A

commercial parties of equal bargaining power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What must be used in the contract if a party is seeking to exclude liability resulting from its own negligence?

A

Clear words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the Canada Steamship test useful for?

A

The Canada Steamship test helps to determine whether an exemption clause should be interpreted as excluding liability for negligence, particularly when the clause is more ambiguous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When are Canada Steamship test and contra-proferentem rule less helpful?

A

in commercial cases where parties have equal bargaining power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

B2B legislation for exemption clauses

A

UCTA 1977

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

B2C legislation for exemption clauses

A

CRA 2015

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When considering whether a party can rely on an exemption clause, you need to consider which 3 points?

A

Incorporation
Construction - does the clause cover the breach and loss?
Statutory controls - CRA or UCTA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Any contractual term limiting liability for loss (other than death or PI) resulting from negligence is

A

valid if reasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Any attempt to exclude or restrict liability for death or personal injury resulting from negligence will be

A

void

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

If the wording is clear, you should analyse

A

the ordinary and natural meaning of the words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Requirement of reasonableness is judged at what time?

A

the time the contract was made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

To pass the UCTA reasonableness test, the term that purports to exclude liability must be

A

fair and reasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Factors that suggest a clause is reasonable

A

equal bargaining power; an inducement; whether the customer knew or ought to have known of the existence of the term

17
Q

what is reasonable is an issue of

18
Q

Under CRA 2015, a term is unfair if, contrary to the requirement of good faith, it causes a

A

significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations under the contract to the detriment of the consumer (s 62(4))

19
Q

when is unfairness judged?

A

at the time the contract is entered into

20
Q

If a party wants to exclude their liability in negligence, the most certain way to achieve this is by

A

using the word negligence or a close synonym for negligence