Expert Witnesses Flashcards

(15 cards)

1
Q

What distinguishes an expert witness from a lay witness in California criminal cases?

A

An expert witness can provide opinions to the jury that are related to a subject sufficiently beyond common experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the qualifications that allow a witness to testify as an expert?

A

Particularized skill, knowledge, education, experience, and/or training.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Give two common examples of expert witnesses in California criminal cases.

A
  • Experts on possession for sale of narcotics
  • Experts on criminal street gangs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a significant difference between California and Federal Rules of Evidence regarding learned treatises?

A

California does not have an explicit Learned Treatise hearsay exception.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Under what conditions can an expert be cross-examined about the content of a scientific publication?

A

An expert can be cross-examined if:
1. They referred to, considered, or relied upon the publication in forming their opinion;
2. The publication has been admitted in evidence; or
3. The publication has been established as a reliable authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

True or False: An expert can present hearsay materials to the jury as exhibits.

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is permissible when an expert’s opinion contradicts a study’s findings?

A

It is permissible to ask the expert about their familiarity with the study and its bearing on their opinion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What type of questions can experts be asked in gang cases?

A

Hypothetical questions based on the facts of the case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was a major issue in the California Supreme Court case People v. Sanchez?

A

The expert had never had contact with the defendant, and the officers who had contact did not testify. This violated the rules against hearsay and the confrontation clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What must a prosecutor establish to prove a defendant’s gang membership according to Sanchez?

A

The expert must have personal knowledge of the defendant or first-hand admissions from the defendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What should an expert not refer to in their answers regarding gang membership?

A

Hearsay admissions by the defendant unless proven through competent evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fill in the blank: Expert witnesses are not a vehicle for an end run around the _______.

A

hearsay rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How can Sanchez be used against defense experts?

A

It questions the admissibility of defense gang experts’ testimony if they lack personal knowledge of the defendant’s gang.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What should be prepared in advance when asking a hypothetical question in court?

A

Write it down well in advance in a non-argumentative fashion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How should a gang hypothetical be drafted?

A

The hypothetical question must closely track the facts presented in the case. It should be written in advance and should not be argumentative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly