Explain Seligman’s concept of ‘positive explanatory style’. Taking the domains of professional sport and student examination performance, briefly outline your views on the strengths and limitations of the concept. Flashcards

(11 cards)

1
Q

1st paragraph

A
  • “Success requires persistence, the ability to not give up in the face of failure… Optimistic explanatory style is the key to persistence” - Seligman (1990)
  • Definition of optimism and pessimism
  • Interesting as may be key to success
  • Curing negatives doesn’t produce positives
  • Development of positive psychology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2nd paragraph

A
  • Seligman (1967) theory of learned helplessness, dogs inescapable shock, escapable shock no shock
  • Can be extrapolated to humans Seligman (1972)
  • Hiroto (1971) - humans noise learned helplessness
  • Helpless person more likely to be pessimistic
  • Differences between optimist and pessimist - permanence, pervasiveness and personalisation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3rd paragraph

A
  • Permanence - bad events temporary, pessimists take longer to recover
  • Pessimists see positive events as short-lived, optimists believe good things happen for permanent reasons
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

4th paragraph

A
  • Pervasiveness - optimists tend to compartmentalise their helplessness, only feeling helpless about one area of life
  • Pessimists extrapolate their failures to all areas of life
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

5th paragraph

A
  • Personalisation - optimists dont blame bad events on internal factors, internalise positive events
  • Pessimists blame themselves for negative events and externalise positive events
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

6th paragraph

A
  • Ellis (1957) ABC model CBT to change thoughts
  • Adversity
  • Belief
  • Consequence
  • Seligman (1991) added D and E
  • D disputation
  • E energisation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

7th paragraph

A
  • Professional sport
  • Gordon (2006) football pitch strong correlation between ASQ optimism and performance
  • Optimistic soccer players demonstrated better performance during a loss than pessimists
  • Rettew & Reivich (1995) positive explanatory style experienced more wins in basketball and baseball
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

8th paragraph

A
  • Academic performance
  • PES yields positive outcomes
  • Peterson & Barrett (1987) students explained poor performance with internal causes received lower grades during their first year than students who used external causes
  • NES less likely to have specific academic goals and made use of less academic advising
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

9th paragraph

A
  • Norem & Cantor (1989) defined defensive pessimism as a coping strategy
  • Defensive pessimism prepares for anxiety-provoking events or performances
  • Overly anxious about negative result despite good track record
  • Defensive pessimism causes harder working
  • DPs performed just as well as academic optimists
  • Only in short term
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

10th paragraph

A
  • Optimistic illusions of performance aren’t linked with good mental health and rather narcissism (Robins & John, 1997)
  • Weinstein, Lyons, Sandman and Cuite (1998) people optimistic about and underestimated radon in homes less likely to engage in risk prevention
  • Extrapolated to domains of academic performance and sport - complacency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

11th paragraph

A
  • Clear OES is important, not exclusively
  • OES can increase performance, not without limitations
  • Optimism alone cannot be held responsible for success
  • Best outcomes combination of expertise, effort and explanatory style
  • Mere optimism cannot make up for a lack of skill/knowledge, can enhance these
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly